1. To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Microsoft CEO will buy L.A. Clippers for $2 billion

Discussion in 'GENERAL SPORTS TALK' started by Prime Time, May 29, 2014.

  1. Prime Time RODerator

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    Messages:
    5,138
    Likes Received:
    4,505
    Clippers sale raises stakes for NFL teams
    Posted by Mike Florio on May 29, 2014

    [​IMG]Getty Images

    NFL owners have more reasons to smile tonight. Hundreds of million more reasons. If not billions.

    Per multiple reports, former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer will buy the L.A. Clippers from Donald Sterling for $2 billion.

    That’s Steve Ballmer. As in this Steve Ballmer. Paying $2 billion.

    That’s not a bad return for Sterling, who bought the team in 1981 for $12.5 million.

    It’s also nearly four times more than the previous record haul of $550 million for the Milwaukee Bucks, which were sold for $550 million. It’s also second only in all sports to the L.A. Dodgers, which were purchased most recently from Frank McCourt for $2.1 billion.

    So what does that mean for NFL franchises? The estate of Ralph Wilson is about to find out.

    Two years ago, Jimmy Haslam bought the Browns reportedly for $1.05 billion. Before that, Shad Khan purchased the Jaguars for $760 million.

    If an NBA franchise can be worth $2 billion, what could an NFL team go for?

    Surely, the Los Angeles location factored into the price. And that could prompt someone who owns or who wants to buy an NFL team to suddenly get serious about moving to L.A. If baseball and basketball teams playing there are worth more than $2 billion, what would an NFL team in L.A. be worth?

    Three billion? Four billion? More?

    Buffalo fans hopes that the estate of Ralph Wilson doesn’t find out.
     
    #1
  2. Boffo97 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    I'm not sure I'd want to own an NBA team if you can be forced out merely for having an unpopular opinion.

    Don't get me wrong, Sterling's racist attitude was repugnant to me as a person, but a precedent has been set for opinions which some disagree with, but that people could legitimately hold.
     
    #2
  3. ED_29 Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2014
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    47
    First the Dodgers now the Clippers..... A friggin basketball team

    That LA market is just waiting for a football team. Not sure it will be the the Rams, Raiders, Bills, Chargers, or Jags... But whoever moves there will instantly become a cornerstone franchise for the league and a national team.

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/29/us/nba-clippers-sterling/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
     
    #3
    Last edited: May 29, 2014
  4. PhxRam The Estimated Prophet

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,773
    Likes Received:
    2,318
    It is getting absurd.. Initially someone said 1.2 billion for the Clippers and I said they were crazy..
     
    #4
  5. Boffo97 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    I honestly wonder how many L.A. fans would get behind the Raiders coming back... it would feel like someday they'll return to Oakland again and it'd be hard to invest emotionally in them because of that.
     
    #5
  6. ED_29 Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2014
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    47
    Agreed....that's just a crazy number
     
    #6
  7. PhxRam The Estimated Prophet

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,773
    Likes Received:
    2,318
    That must mean the lakers are at least 3 billion then.
     
    #7
  8. bwdenverram Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    462
    You would think regardless of recent improvements by the Clippers the Lakers history alone is worth 10X that. But just nuts man.
     
    #8
  9. Stranger How big is infinity?

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    1,128
    Ballmer made a good investment. The cash price is almost irrelevant. He'll get a financial ROI out of this deal and more.
     
    #9
    Dieter the Brock likes this.
  10. Ramhusker Well-Known Member Pit Boss

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    773
    Boy, they sure showed that Donald Sterling fella! That oughta teach him!:rolleyes:
     
    #10
    MerlinJones, RamFan503 and RhodyRams like this.
  11. RhodyRams Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    1,420
    yup, nothing like forcing a guy to make $1.9 billion to teach him a lesson
     
    #11
  12. Boffo97 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    Apparently $2 billion isn't enough for some people....

    http://nba.si.com/2014/06/09/donald-sterling-sue-nba-1-billion/?eref=sihp

    Donald Sterling reverses course, will sue NBA for $1 billion after all
    Adam Silver, Donald Sterling, Los Angeles Clippers, Rob Mahoney, Shelly Sterling, Steve Ballmer
    By Rob Mahoney
    [​IMG]
    Donald Sterling will sue the NBA for $1 billion in damages. (ROBYN BECK/AFP)

    Disgraced Clippers owner Donald Sterling has shifted his plans yet again and now intends to follow through with his lawsuit against the NBA, according to Sterling’s attorney.

    “The deal is off,” Sterling’s attorney, Max Blecher, told ESPN.com.

    Just last week Blecher conveyed that Sterling would forego legal action and consent to the sale of the Clippers to former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer. That plan has apparently changed, and Sterling will sue the league for $1 billion in damages as initially intended.


    “From the onset, I did not want to sell the Los Angeles Clippers,” Sterling said in a letter circulated among those involved in the sale and released by ESPN.com. “I believe that [NBA commissioner] Adam Silver acted in haste by illegally ordering the forced sale of the Clippers, banning me for life from the NBA and imposing the fine. Adam Silver’s conduct in doing so without conducting any real investigation was wrong.

    “The action taken by Adam Silver and the NBA constitutes a violation of my rights and fly in the face of the freedoms that are afforded to all Americans.”

    The charges of the suit include an invasion of Sterling’s constitutional rights, violation of anti-trust laws and breach of fiduciary duty associated with the NBA’s lifetime ban and termination charges. In April, Silver banned Sterling from the NBA for life and issued a $2.5 million fine — the most allowed by league rules — in response to racist comments from Sterling that were made public.

    Silver also commented on this lawsuit, specifically, in his press conference before Game 2 of the NBA Finals. He repeated multiple times that the suit stands as a roadblock that must be overcome for the sale of the Clippers to Ballmer can be officially completed. Silver said that Shelly Sterling, Donald’s wife, informed him she has a “high degree of confidence” that Donald Sterling’s lawsuit against the league will be resolved.

    Although Sterling will file the suit against the NBA, the league is legally protected from any damages. Shelly Sterling signed a “binding contract” in May to sell the Clippers to Ballmer for $2 billion. As part of the formal sale agreement, Shelly agreed to “indemnify the NBA against lawsuits from others, including from Donald Sterling,” according to an official release. That means that Sterling himself – via the Sterling Family Trust — would be liable for any damages issued to the league.

    “So in essence, Donald is suing himself and he knows that,” Silver said. “While I understand he is frustrated, I think it’s over. I think it’s just a matter of time now.”

    Sterling initially seemed willing to cooperate with the aforementioned arrangement, as Blecher said that a larger deal was in place in which the NBA also agreed not to counter-sue Sterling. Silver, however, made clear at his Sunday press conference that that there was never any possibility of lifting either Sterling’s lifetime ban or his $2.5 million fine. Per ESPN.com, Blecher declined to comment as to whether that refusal played a part in Sterling changing his mind. Blecher also suggested to Ramona Shelburne of ESPN.com that a challenge against Shelly Sterling’s authority could be made in probate court as soon as Tuesday.

    All of these developments come on the heels of news that Sterling had recently been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Sterling was reportedly declared to be “mentally incapacitated” by doctors in May – a determination that removed him from power of the Sterling Family Trust and, by extension, the Clippers. That left Shelly Sterling as the sole trustee of the family trust. With that status, Shelly Sterling was fully empowered to sell the Clippers to Ballmer with the NBA’s blessing.

    Blecher has vehemently denied the reports of his client’s poor mental state, telling Shelburne that Donald is “far from mentally incompetent” and calling the test results “grossly exaggerated.”

    Due to a clause in the Sterling family trust, Donald or Shelly can be removed from power if medical experts declared the mentally unfit. The doctors’ diagnosis of Donald Sterling’s Alzheimer’s disease triggered the process, allowing for Shelly to then sell the team without Donald’s consent.

    “Commissioner Silver has consistently said the preferred outcome to the Clippers proceeding would be a voluntary sale of the team,” said NBA spokesman Mike Bass. “Shelly Sterling advised the NBA last night that an agreement had been reached with Steve Ballmer, and the NBA Advisory/Finance Committee met via conference call this morning to discuss these developments. We await the submission of necessary documentation from Mrs. Sterling. In the meantime, the June 3 special meeting of the NBA Board of Governors remains as scheduled.”

    SI.com’s Michael McCann reported last Thursday that the NBA could fast track the sale of the Clippers if it has a “favorable impression” about a prospective owner. Ballmer fit the criteria, having made a record offer and being previously vetted by the NBA in his attempt to buy the Kings.

    Donald Sterling, 80, has owned the Clippers for 33 years, making him the NBA’s longest-tenured owner. But the NBA recently initiated a charge to terminate his ownership, outlining a list of actions that have have “damaged and continue to damage the NBA and its teams” while also listing off a series of negative impacts on the league. The NBA is taking issue with Sterling for the following reasons:

    • Disparaging African-Americans and minorities.
    • Directing a female acquaintance not to associate publicly with African-Americans or to bring African-Americans to Clippers games.
    • Criticizing African-Americans for not supporting their communities.
    The first two items relate to comments made by Sterling to his girlfriend, V. Stiviano, in a private tape that was released by TMZ. The third item relates to comments made during an interview with CNN this month. The NBA is listing the following impacts of Sterling’s comments and behavior:

    • Significantly undermining the NBA’s efforts to promote diversity and inclusion.
    • Damaging the NBA’s relationship with its fans.
    • Harming NBA owners, players and Clippers team personnel.
    • Impairing the NBA’s relationship with marketing and merchandising partners, as well as with government and community leaders.
     
    #12
    Prime Time likes this.
  13. WelfareRam New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    21
    I hope Sterling get's every penny from the N.B.A. and their illegal representation of the Law of the land. In California it is illegal to tape someone's conversation without their consent. 4th ammendment and 1st ammendment violations by the league in this situation.Sterling may be a bias old S.O.B., but in the privacy of his own home he can have whatever opinion he wants.
     
    #13
  14. Boffo97 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    2,005
    The NBA would argue that the Bill of Rights limits only the government and not them. And that they didn't go out and gather this evidence, but it was thrust into the public limelight. If anyone is sued for illegally taping Sterling, it'd be the mistress.

    To me, the key of the argument is now whether or not Sterling has Alzheimer's. If he did, he has no case, but it actually makes what he did a lot less awful.

    If he doesn't, then the contract indemnifying the NBA is null and void, and it's going to be a mess.

    But I agree that one's private thoughts, now matter how reprehensible, aren't something that one should be punished to this degree for.
     
    #14