.
That can't be right.
Can it?
.
It's the lack of passing TD's.
It's been a little odd, unlucky, in that we have had a few receivers tackled inside the 2yd line... I think like 3+ times... only to turn around and run it in.
Most recently, against Seattle Everett probably had a receiving TD but the Rams didn't challenge it last game.
If Goff had the TD's, the yards and completion % is strong enough. He's also getting docked some for the INT's (oh by the way some unlucky ones there off hands, too).
Exactly. Goff rating for Seattle was 83.3It's the lack of passing TD's.
It's been a little odd, unlucky, in that we have had a few receivers tackled inside the 2yd line... I think like 3+ times... only to turn around and run it in.
Most recently, against Seattle Everett probably had a receiving TD but the Rams didn't challenge it last game.
If Goff had the TD's, the yards and completion % is strong enough. He's also getting docked some for the INT's (oh by the way some unlucky ones there off hands, too).
Agree on the adversity comment for most people NOT all. Goff's rating will increase but not to the point needed to right this offense to the 2017/2018 effectiveness.Agree his rating will rise. They are very close to being themselves on offense. Also they have two TEs playing well and Everett finally putting it all together in the passing game.
This is good for him too. Little adversity to sharpen him up. Humble pie for the whole roster tbh, they'll work past it.
Being reminded that they're not better than everyone else is a great way to get their heads back in the game for the playoff push. Ties into We Not Me, team-first mentality, etc. IF they come out of this they will be a very strong and resilient team that is ready to make a run IMO.Agree on the adversity comment for most people NOT all. Goff's rating will increase but not to the point needed to right this offense to the 2017/2018 effectiveness.