Glennon For A Third Rounder?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

What, if anything, should the Rams trade for Glennon?

  • No trade, he's not worth it for the Rams

    Votes: 59 78.7%
  • If the Bucs would take the Rams' 3rd, sure

    Votes: 14 18.7%
  • Trade the second, get Glennon and a lower pick or two

    Votes: 2 2.7%

  • Total voters
    75

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,929
http://www.bucsnation.com/2016/3/11...caneers-want-a-high-third-round-pick-for-mike

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are open to trading Mike Glennon, for the right price. What that right price isn't clear, though. An earlier report said the Bucs wouldn't even take a first-round pick, but that seems ludicrous. Bleacher Report's Matt Miller talked to several personnel executives who say the Bucs would take a high third-round pick, instead.

After Colin Kaepernick, the quarterback most teams are interested in on the trade block is Mike Glennon. I'm told by multiple general managers and pro personnel directors that the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have floated that they want a first-round draft pick for him, but would accept a third from a team with a high pick in the round.


This makes a lot more sense than the report that the Bucs wouldn't take a first-round pick for Glennon, a quarterback who has exactly one year left on his contract and will only start games this season if Jameis Winston has to miss any due to suspension or injury -- which seems unlikely at this point, though stranger things have happened.

So far, teams haven't been quite desperate enough to arrange a trade for Glennon. They've traded for Mark Sanchez, and there are rumors that Colin Kaepernick is on the trade block as well. But teams interested in a quarterback can still draft a quarterback, and as long as that's a realistic option you're unlikely to see big trade deals. When a team misses out on a quarterback, that's when things will really get interesting.



The Rams don't have a high third, of course - either the Bucs would take slightly less, the Rams could kick something in, or the Rams could trade a second to another team, get a high third and some lower picks, and then trade the third to TB for Glennon. Should they do so?
 

JackDRams

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,524
Name
Jack
I'd rather roll with Keenum. Or Mannion for that matter and surround them with weapons.
 

RaminExile

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
3,065
Is his upside really so much higher than Keenums for the loss of a third?

Id like us to take a flyer on Jaylon Smith with that third if no one else has taken the gamble on that torn up knee. Even if not ther are a lot of talented guys still going to be around in that round we could use. I like Glennon but I don't think he's that much better than Case to be worth that. A 5th? Maybe. If they take Foles also...
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
11,297
F that... I agree @JackDRams no way in hell I trade anything but a 5th or down for him. What more do you get for him than what Keenum or Mannion is?
 

Boston Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
3,565
I wrote about this in a thread about a week or 2 ago. I would definitely do this deal.

I would offer a 4th this year and a a conditional next year based on games played and other benchmarks.

He was a 3rd rounder to begin with i think and when he has played has played well. He also has 2 years left on his rookie deal so you get him for 2 years in his rookie contract. So for this reason I think Tampa's asking price is right where it should be.

Unless the Rams really like Mannion they should do this deal and I hope for 1 they do
 

Roman Snow

H.I.M.
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
2,615
Name
John
I'll send Foles to them for their first round pick.

Is my proposal more rediculous than theirs? I swear, all these teams overvaluing guys. I like Keenum better and he knows our system.
 

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,929
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
I like Keenum, I just suspect Glennon's high end is higher than his. Mannion would be the big question - perhaps Snisher thinks he is ready to take a leap forward.

Keenum, Glennon and Mannion would be an interesting QB competition at least.

I would rather the Rams not do the sort of trade I think would be necessary to get Goff or Wentz this year.
 

8to12

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Camp Reporter
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
1,287
3/12: The Buccaneers will not trade Mike Glennon. - , JoeBucsFan.com

...From Walter Football as of Sat 3/12
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,832
Nah. I like Glennon but this isn't the right environment and it wouldn't solve our problems. Denver is a team that should consider trading for Glennon.
 

OC_Ram

Restricted Free Agent
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
1,085
We appear to be committed to "build through the draft", let's stay the course.
 

Ramrasta

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
3,116
Name
Tyler
I think Case could run our offense better. If we want a stork at QB, we might as well draft Lynch but I'd rather not. No way we should be fooled into trading for someone else's leftovers when we have few picks this year as it is.
 

Orchid

Starter
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
742
Name
Obert
I like Keenum, I just suspect Glennon's high end is higher than his. Mannion would be the big question - perhaps Snisher thinks he is ready to take a leap forward.

Keenum, Glennon and Mannion would be an interesting QB competition at least.

I would rather the Rams not do the sort of trade I think would be necessary to get Goff or Wentz this year.

Any moves I would make this year would be to get another 1 or 2 so that I can get to Watson ( first choice) or the kid out of Miami. I think they are a level above Wentz and Goff and maybe equal to Winton/Mariota

I also believe Glennon's tape is better than Keenun's. More wins better productions. I would trade for him, trade or cut Foles ( to Tampa Bay LOL) and draft another QB this year ( and every year to we hit this right.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,026
I like Glennon and think he is better than Keenum. The Bucs are saying they want him to drive up the price.they know his normal worth but also figure if someone is asking at this point, then they will pay more.

Once again, it depends on what Snishers plan is. Don't draft a QB? Then I'd bring in Glennon to up the competition. If they are going to move up for a rookie QB, then don't.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,510
Name
Dennis
My observation about this regime...High profile free agents like Jake Long and Jared Cook did not pan out so they won't spend a ton of money on in their eyes other teams failures Kevin Demoff even eluded to this in his recent presentation.

IMO because the trade of Foles did not work out again they won't pursue a trade this regime has always felt the proper way to build a team is through the draft and that's why IMO, that is where the future Field General of the Los Angeles Rams will emerge, for better or worse.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,026
My observation about this regime...High profile free agents like Jake Long and Jared Cook did not pan out so they won't spend a ton of money on in their eyes other teams failures Kevin Demoff even eluded to this in his recent presentation.

IMO because the trade of Foles did not work out again they won't pursue a trade this regime has always felt the proper way to build a team is through the draft and that's why IMO, that is where the future Field General of the Los Angeles Rams will emerge, for better or worse.

Good point Den.
 

fancents86

Starter
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
997
Glennon is the guy I wanted the Rams to grab for a couple years now (besides Tebow :D). A third seems high, but last year we grabbed Mannion in the third and he hasn't done anything yet, he doesn't even get the reps in practice. If we throw a third at Glennon, we get someone who I personally think will be better than anyone we get in the third in this class of qb's. With the Rams dedicated to Keenum, I don't see them going after any qb's higher than the third, so what are we really losing?