Fukushima radiation skyrockets after possible fuel breach

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,154
Name
Burger man
Man... this is bad.

https://www.engadget.com/2017/02/03/fukushima-radiation-skyrockets-after-possible-fuel-breach/

Radiation levels inside the damaged Fukushima nuclear reactor are over 100 times fatal levels, the highest they've been since the triple meltdown in March, 2011, according to operator Tepco. The company recently sent a camera-equipped robot into the reactor, which relayed images showing a meter-wide hole in the pressure vessel (above), with possible melted uranium fuel on a grating below. "It may have ... melted and made a hole in the [containment] vessel, but it is only a hypothesis at this stage," a company spokesperson told the AFP.

Since the accident, the highest recorded level in the plant was around 73 sieverts per hour, but a new reading, estimated from a camera that was sent in on Monday, shows an "unimaginable" 530 sieverts per hour, according to an expert. A dose of one sievert can cause radiation sickness, while 10 sieverts would kill you in a few weeks.

Tepco and its partners had been unable to locate the exposed low-enriched uranium fuel (LEU), a prerequisite to decommissioning the plant. So far, the levels of radiation made it impossible to get cameras and robots in close in close enough to gauge the damage -- of the five sent in, none returned.

Until Monday, it was believed that the radioactive fuel was contained within the reactor's pressure vessel. However, if it broke through into the larger containment vessel, the situation could be much worse than previously thought. The company had planned to deploy a robotic camera in March that can withstand 1,000 sieverts per hour, but the latest readings indicate it would last less than an hour.

Authorities are supposed to figure out a plan to remove the fuel by 2018, but the latest discovery could delay that. In December, the Japanese government pegged the plant decommissioning cost at 21.5 trillion yen ($190 billion), nearly double the original estimate.

 

RedRam

Pro Bowler
Joined
Sep 28, 2015
Messages
1,905
Ho ree :poop:!!

Seriously though, that's incredibly bad stuff happening there. My guess is the costs will easily surpass their expectations.
 

SteezyEndo

The Immaculate Exception
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
7,109
Well whats done is done. Probably the big payback. 30,000 year halflife for Cesium137. It will never go away.
 

Yamahopper

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,838
First off we all have to accept human is an synonym for idiot. WTPhuckery do humans build a nuke on a fault line next to the ocean? They win the lifetime Darwin achievement award. Not for the location, but for putting the backup generators in the basement behind a seawall known to be to low. They didn't want to spend the very few Yen to have a Tertiary cooling system located offshore. So now we all have a 30k year problem.

The real problem is the counties business model. They always take the best case possibility, always. They never see the devil in the details. They nibble when they need to take a mouth full.

There are a couple of partial solutions to the problem they refuse to undertake. But eventuality they will be forced to, and I mean by force.
They need to pump a concrete floor under the reactor 50+ feet thick and under that a lead floor of 50+ feet. then a lead floor. Few hundred billion, Then they should do what they didn't do at Chernobyl, a poured molten lead sarcophagus 30 feet thick to crush and surround the reactor building after they remove as much of the fuel rods as possible. Then seal it it into concrete and stainless steel. While they are doing this they have to block off access to the ocean with a lead lined concrete wall and then treat the run off water for the next 30k years. This solution was from a nuclear engineer not me.

The other solution is keep doing basically nothing. It's worked for 5 years so why stop now.

To correct this would be the biggest undertaking in mans history.
Cost 100 of trillions over the next 1000 years.
 

badnews

Use Your Illusion
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
5,327
Name
Dave
And some people want to keep using nuclear energy....

If we spent one decade with the same effort and dedication that we put into the moon landing on maximizing the efficiency of harnassing renewable energy and storage....

We are totally FUKushima'D.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
First off we all have to accept human is an synonym for idiot. WTPhuckery do humans build a nuke on a fault line next to the ocean? They win the lifetime Darwin achievement award. Not for the location, but for putting the backup generators in the basement behind a seawall known to be to low. They didn't want to spend the very few Yen to have a Tertiary cooling system located offshore. So now we all have a 30k year problem.


LOL that was so well put I don't even know if it could be improved upon.


If we spent one decade with the same effort and dedication that we put into the moon landing on maximizing the efficiency of harnassing renewable energy and storage....

It's silly isn't it.

And it's why all of the first world nations should be funding Elon Musk's brainstorms. And he knows the metric system.