Franchise tag window opens tomorrow

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/02/16/franchise-tag-window-opens-tomorrow/

Franchise tag window opens tomorrow
Posted by Mike Florio on February 16, 2014, 8:38 PM EST
x350-325-e1353111558482.jpg
AP
Starting Monday, the two-week window opens for application of the franchise tag. The device, launched two decades ago with the commencement of true free agency, gives each team the ability to apply some restriction to one otherwise unrestricted free agent each year.

Any player who receives the nonexclusive version of the tag may still negotiate with other teams. An offer sheet may be signed. The franchise player’s current team has seven days to match. If the current team doesn’t match, the contract becomes effective and the new team gives two first-round draft picks to the player’s former team.

Before 2011, the nonexclusive franchise tag was determined by calculating the average cap number of the five highest-paid players at the same position in the prior year. The current labor deal determines the tender by calculating the average salary-cap percentage of the franchise tag in five prior years, a device that keeps the growth of the tag from outpacing the growth of the cap — and likewise from not fully reflecting any growth of the market for the position that surpasses the growth of the cap.

In English (or close to it), this means that, for some positions, the franchise tag may not track the top of the market. As to quarterbacks, for example, the tag will remain in the mid-teens for the next few years, even as the top of the market pushes higher and higher above $20 million annually.

Teams also may use the exclusive franchise tag, which prevents the player from talking to another team and from signing an offer sheet. This heightened restriction carries an additional cost; the player receives an amount equal to the five highest-paid players at the position in the current year, as of late April. The exclusive franchise tender typically is much higher than the non-exclusive tender.

The franchise salary becomes guaranteed the moment the offer is accepted by the player. Until the player signs the tender, it may be withdrawn.

Players often choose not to sign the franchise tender because, if not under contract, they can withhold services without consequences. On multiple occasions, a franchise player has shown up days before the start of the regular season, signed the franchise tender, and earned the full amount of the franchise salary.

Still, some franchise players have the tender withdrawn, making them free agents well after the big money from other teams has stopped flowing.

Even though the window opens Monday, it’s unlikely that teams will rush to use the tag. Most teams will use the period to attempt to negotiate a long-term contract, which will allow the franchise tag to be used on another player. Or not at all.

Last weekend, we took a team-by-team look at the players who could be tagged. In 2012, a record 21 players were tagged. In 2013, the number plummeted to eight. The reduced tags became obvious once the free-agency market opened, and spending was much lower than expected.

This year, tag use could hinge on the extent to which teams believe other teams will be poised to spend money to sign away their free agents. If a spending spree is anticipated, more tags will be used.

The biggest name to watch over the next two weeks will be Saints tight end Jimmy Graham. He’s arguably the best player eligible for free agency, and Graham and the Saints seem destined for a fight over whether he should be tendered as a receiver, which would result in more than $4.5 million in additional salary for 2014 alone.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/5839/franchisetransition-tags-rams

Franchise/transition tags: Rams
February, 17, 2014/By Nick Wagoner | ESPN.com

EARTH CITY, Mo. -- The St. Louis Rams haven't used the franchise tag since 2009, when they slapped it on safety Oshiomogho Atogwe to ensure they wouldn't lose him on the free-agent market. Barring a major last-minute change of heart, the streak of not using any of the three tags will extend to five years in 2014.

i

SaffoldThe Rams have their share of free agents, but only one really merits a conversation about whether to use the tag. Offensive lineman Rodger Saffoldis the team's most important free agent, but he's also not the type of player the Rams will or should overextend themselves to retain, especially at the franchise tag price.

Since moving to St. Louis in 1995, the Rams have used the tag six times, with half of those tags used on a particular offensive lineman. That player was Orlando Pace, the team's franchise left tackle and a likely future Hall of Famer. The word franchise precedes the word tag for a reason. If you are going to use it and spend the money associated with it, it usually needs to be for a foundational player such as Pace.

As good as Saffold was in a relatively small sample size at guard in 2013 and for all his versatility (able to play anywhere but center effectively), his injury history alone makes using the tag too much of an expense. While the franchise tag dollars aren't set in stone just yet, the salary for an offensive lineman receiving the tag is expected to be in the neighborhood of $11 million. Even if the Rams released center Scott Wells and guardHarvey Dahl, the savings wouldn't be enough to cover that expense.

Rams general manager Les Snead has openly acknowledged a desire to retain Saffold, and keeping him should be a priority because of his tremendous upside at guard and overall versatility. But the Rams also have their limits on how much they can spend on a player who hasn't played a full season since he was a rookie in 2010. Using the tag on Saffold would cripple the team's salary-cap situation and preclude it from adding help elsewhere.

Keeping Saffold would allow the Rams more flexibility in free agency and the draft, but what they can justifiably spend to do it is about half of what the franchise tag would cost. For another year, at least, the Rams' franchise tag will go unused.
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
I'd put one of those non-exclusive tags on him. If someone really wants him, they can give us a draft pick for him.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/02/24/snead-says-rams-wont-use-franchise-tag-this-year/

Snead says Rams won’t use franchise tag this year
Posted by Mike Florio on February 24, 2014

Scratch the Rams from the list of teams that possibly will use the franchise tag in 2014.

During a recent interview with Pro Football Talk on NBCSN, Rams G.M. Les Snead characterized offensive lineman Rodger Saffold as the team’s top priority in free agency. But Snead said that the team won’t use the franchise tag on Saffold, or on anyone.

“[W]e will try to get Saffold done, just through natural, regular negotiations,” Snead said.

With the Rams viewing Saffold over the long haul as a guard, applying the franchise tag makes little sense, given that the calculation lumps all offensive linemen into the same category — which means the tag reflects elite left tackle money.

The Rams have no other big-name free agents that would justify franchise-tag money, so it makes sense that they won’t be using the franchise tag.
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
Total sense, no matter how important he is, franchise money would be too much for him. Heck, it would be too much for Jake Long.