Expecting the usual turnover among NFL playoff teams? Not in 2014/LaCanfora

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Expecting the usual turnover among NFL playoff teams? Not in 2014
May 26, 2014 10:28 am ET

By Jason LaCanfora

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer...-squads-seahawks-49ers-pats-will-rule-2014-wi

The NFL is king, at least in part, because of its unpredictability.

Every year there is a substantial turnover among playoffs teams, to the point where the country takes notice. It's part of what makes suicide pools much more difficult in practice than in theory. It keeps most fan bases from becoming too alienated from playoff contention and it helps explain why this group of owners is eager to tap into the enhanced earning potential of an expanded playoff field.

But this year I'm not buying it. I don't see it.

The status quo will rule. The league's premier contenders the past few years will be just that again. The trend of teams coming from nowhere to turn the NFL on its ear will take a year off. We're very deep into the offseason, to the point where almost every significant roster move has been made, and I just don't see the NFL power structure changing much at all.

I see the league's socialist nature -- the draft, salary cap, how the schedule works -- helping several teams that took a major jump last season regress to the mean. And just the same I don't see the hierarchy of each of the NFL's eight divisions changing much. I see the AFC North returning as a power division after a year off in 2013 (only the Bengals made the playoffs). The NFC West will remain a dominant division; the AFC West, forced to play the NFC West this season, will take a major step back. Not a whole hell of a lot will change.

History tells us every year at least five new teams will qualify for the 12-team postseason field (12 teams for now, as we know that will be going up to 14 by 2015). And perhaps that will be the case again in 2015. But even if it is this season, I'd be quite surprised if any of these new additions actually reach the Super Bowl, or dare I say hoist the Lombardi Trophy. The group of teams that I view as true championship contenders -- squads like Denver and Seattle and San Francisco and New England -- are already longtime postseason veterans.

Nothing that has occurred in the past three months has altered the balance of power in either conference as we examine each division.

NFC West: The Seahawks and 49ers remain the top dogs in this division -- and the conference. Though I could see the 49ers certainly suffering from within, should they fail to secure coach Jim Harbaugh and quarterback Colin Kaepernick for the long-term in the next few weeks. Having them continue to play out their contracts -- deals they have far outperformed -- could lead to a degree of turmoil which could undermine a franchise that has been to three straight conference title games. I have the Rams tabbed as one of the new entrants to the postseason field, with their past few drafts paying big dividends. They should overcome even more pedestrian play from quarterback Sam Bradford to get them over the hump, given how strong I anticipate them being running the football and playing defense. I could just as easily pick the Cardinals here, but I have a morbid feeling that the Rams, in the final year of their lease and with a move to Los Angeles perhaps not all that far away, find a way to put it all together in what could be their final season in the Midwest.

NFC North: With a healthy Aaron Rodgers, the Packers will easily pull away, eliminating the intrigue surrounding this division last season. The Bears still can't play defense (also, how Jay Cutler responds to his massive new contract and the loss of BFF and fellow quarterback Josh McCown is among the interesting NFC North subplots) and the Lions have to prove they can turn off their self-destruct switch. The Vikings are still the Vikings. I'm not sure anyone aside from the Packers in this division pushes for the playoffs.

NFC South: A year ago I loved the Saints to return to glory in this division and, assuming they resolve the Jimmy Graham grievance situation (by no means a fait accompli), I will again anoint them the team to beat. The Falcons will be better, though I'm not sure nearly improved enough defensively to be a real contender. The Panthers, after their offseason losses, may be a team falling back to the pack. I wouldn't be stunned if the Bucs were a new addition to the playoff field. I love their offseason (except for not having a staff that could find a way to utilize a superstar like Darrelle Revis). But I think they end up much improved but still on the outside of playoffs -- though, again, sneaking in as a wild card would not be a shock.

NFC East: This once again is largely division full of mediocrity and pretenders. I'll take the Eagles to win it, based on their offensive firepower. I don't see another playoff team in this bunch, though the Giants will be much more stable and consistent this season and should be the second-beat team in this division.

AFC North: I like the schedules for the Bengals, Ravens and Steelers. I don't see much changing in terms of them all playing meaningful games deep into December. And this year I foresee all three returning to the postseason, but without Cincinnati remaining on top as division champ. The loss of more key free agents will catch up to the Bengals, and Baltimore and Pittsburgh will be much more formidable offensively on a weekly basis.

AFC East: The Patriots remain the division's only viable club, an absolute tenet of NFL life for 15 years or so, save a few seasons the Jets played above their heads. No one will challenge them and I would not be surprised if every other team in this division makes major changes for 2015, whether it be in the front office or coaching staff -- or both in the cases of the Dolphins and Bills, in particular. I can just picture Bill Belichick sitting back on a recliner at night, a glass of expensive red wine in his hand, laughing diabolically at the inability of many of these teams to ever get out of their own way.

AFC West: This was the surprise division of the NFL in 2013, with the Chargers and Chiefs returning to the playoffs in their first seasons under new coaches and GMs. And both could take a step back this season. They play very difficult schedules and teams will be ready for them. I'm not sure they can maintain the kind of gains they made a year ago.

AFC South: It's the worst division in football -- perhaps the worst division in professional sports. There are three teams very deep in a rebuild and the Colts, still not established as a well-rounded team, have the only real quarterback in the division in Andrew Luck. So even without Robert Mathis for a quarter of the season, the division is still there for them to grab. No one else is even a .500 team in my estimation and while the Colts might take a step back, too, no way is it to the extent that anyone else in this sad-sack division is ready to take advantage.

So there you have it. No major surprises.

Two divisions will each send three teams through. Many coaches and quarterbacks you expect in the playoffs will return. I would be willing to bet teams like the 49ers and Seahawks and Broncos and Patriots are right back in the conference championships. And if a team like the Ravens or Steelers, who have won recent Super Bowls themselves, got back in that final four mix, would that constitute any sort of upset?

Not in my book. Look for 2015 to be more chalk. The salary-cap era may have in fact eliminated the era of the dynasties, but it hasn't kept the best franchises from rising to the top more often than not.
 

OC--LeftCoast

Agent Provocateur
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
3,695
Name
Greg
... but I have a morbid feeling that the Rams, in the final year of their lease and with a move to Los Angeles perhaps not all that far away, find a way to put it all together in what could be their final season in the Midwest.
--------------------------------------------------------
Uh oh

There is just no talk what-so-ever out here regarding that, so relax St Louis guys, it's not happening.
 

The Rammer

ESPN Draft Guru
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
2,400
Name
Rick
The first time I think I've heard LaCanfora make any sense .... or at least somewhat.
 

Tron

Fights for the User
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,803
Name
Tron
... but I have a morbid feeling that the Rams, in the final year of their lease and with a move to Los Angeles perhaps not all that far away, find a way to put it all together in what could be their final season in the Midwest.
--------------------------------------------------------
Uh oh

There is just no talk what-so-ever out here regarding that, so relax St Louis guys, it's not happening.

Also, he fails to realize that there is no where for them to play. There is no stadium and LA isnt close to having one.

His comment is total shit lol
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
Also, he fails to realize that there is no where for them to play. There is no stadium and LA isnt close to having one.

His comment is total crap lol
If a move was made, there are temporary homes for the Rams available. None are ideal, but it wouldn't be the first case of a team moving and playing in a temporary home until their permanent home was constructed.
 

PowayRamFan

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
2,359
Why would his feeling about the Rams playoff chances be "morbid"? Does he dislike our guys so much that he has to use an adjective like that? Will it kill him if we make it?
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
I could just as easily pick the Cardinals here, but I have a morbid feeling that the Rams, in the final year of their lease and with a move to Los Angeles perhaps not all that far away, find a way to put it all together in what could be their final season in the Midwest.

Take that statement and really break it down. It's stupid, poorly thought out and badly constructed.

And it's just bullshit.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,984
.

laclownfora really hates sam bradford. has he been this way towards him since he entered the league?

.
 

MFaulk107

The Realness
Joined
Nov 1, 2013
Messages
567
I know the 9ers and Seacocks are the "favorites" but we competed against them well with a 2ND STRING. The Cardinals are good but we beat em.

The Rams are just as tough n it will show this season we aren't to be tampered with.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,128
Name
Burger man
I could just as easily pick the Cardinals here, but I have a morbid feeling that the Rams, in the final year of their lease and with a move to Los Angeles perhaps not all that far away, find a way to put it all together in what could be their final season in the Midwest.

Take that statement and really break it down. It's stupid, poorly thought out and badly constructed.

And it's just bullcrap.

Man... LaCanfora really blows his credibility with that massive sentence.

I get that there is a lease issue, but really? Final season? Dude is obviously not following the situation close enough.

Makes the whole article worthless.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Man... LaCanfora really blows his credibility with that massive sentence.

I get that there is a lease issue, but really? Final season? Dude is obviously not following the situation close enough.

Makes the whole article worthless.

It's like these morons dont understand that they are falling for the trap, just like the Councilman in LA. But at least he finally got it. Coming from a guy who writes about the NFL for a living this is soooooo bad.
 

V3

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
3,848
Why would his feeling about the Rams playoff chances be "morbid"? Does he dislike our guys so much that he has to use an adjective like that? Will it kill him if we make it?

I'm thinking he's directing the morbid feelings towards the move, not the Rams making the playoffs. I could be wrong. His phrasing is a bit confusing.
 

wrstdude

Rookie
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
433
He's written a couple articles about the Rams moving to LA.

He's a complete hack.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,796
As usual, La Canfora is being an idiot. Most NFL fans I know think of him as a joke...constantly wrong with his rumors. Kind of the Anti-Schefter. I'll bet he's wrong again here...both about LA and the turnover not happening.
 

Ramrasta

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
3,116
Name
Tyler
Turnover happens not only from the acquisition of new players in the offseason but also changes in coaching staff, development/regression of the guys already in place, and injury. There will be turnover of playoff teams as usual and La Canfora probably doesn't know what color shirt he is wearing until he looks down.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,739
I could just as easily pick the Cardinals here, but I have a morbid feeling that the Rams, in the final year of their lease and with a move to Los Angeles perhaps not all that far away, find a way to put it all together in what could be their final season in the Midwest.

Take that statement and really break it down. It's stupid, poorly thought out and badly constructed.

And it's just bullcrap.

It is typical for this guy. That is why I always call him Jason LaClownfora. He is one of the worst in he business and when he writes his articles are usually very long, yet say nothing of substance. I had to read the NFC West just for the entertainment of how inane this guy is.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,739
As usual, La Canfora is being an idiot. Most NFL fans I know think of him as a joke...constantly wrong with his rumors. Kind of the Anti-Schefter. I'll bet he's wrong again here...both about LA and the turnover not happening.

Who do you take in a fight? Glazer or Jason?

Seriously though Glazer seems to get the serious inside info without the ESPN or NFL Network clout. LaClownfora always claims to have sources but I don't think they can be real solid sources because he is wrong so often.