I've liked what I've seen from him. My he may suck comment was if he plays more we may find out he sucks. I'm not sure he does though and from what I've seen he is as good as our other WRs.
What's the point of continually playing players who you don't see as long term solutions (Britt & Quick to name two) when you have a chance to give a player with potential an opportunity to to get some experience and for the Rams to get a better idea about what they have now and what they still need. Good idea FRO.
I don't know how good Givens is, but I agree trading him for basically nothing was a bad move. He made some plays for us this year after having a great preseason.
Pretty much the same can be said for all our WRs, they're getting open.. We just don't have anybody to get it to them and haven't for like 4 years and then they take all the flack for it.
Out QB play has suffered since Bradford went down, however I disagree that out WRs are any good. They have been part of the problem.
They've had a drop problem earlier in the season, but that as slowed to a crawl since and they've been getting open almost every game since and Foles and Keenum have just refused to hit them. Quick especially has suffered this, just look in that reasons why Foles should start thread, I posted a couple of gifs and there's at least 5 overthrows to Quick and that's just in one game, that's not counting the misses we all saw in Minnesota and even against San Fran and Cleveland, those just don't come up as much because Gurley stole the show. With how limited opportunities in the NFL are as a whole, being overthrown multiple times is damning, so I can't say they've been a big part of the problem when they've tightened up where they needed to and somebody else continues to let THEM down.
