Best Hall of Fame Argument for Every NFL Team: Rams - Kevin Greene

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2527277-the-best-hall-of-fame-argument-for-every-nfl-team/page/30

The Best Hall of Fame Argument for Every NFL Team
By Mike Tanier, NFL National Lead Writer Aug 7, 2015

St. Louis Rams: Kevin Greene, Linebacker
hi-res-6889538b53f173c758c653195379e2ac_crop_north.jpg



Ironically, if Greene had zero official sacks because he played in the 1970s, he'd have already been carried into the Hall of Fame on a velvet pillow. A Rams and Steelers star with a wild man reputation, Lynyrd Skynyrd-roadie hair, and a long post-playing career as an approachable and agreeable assistant coach? Voters would write sonnets about how fearsome and disruptive Greene was, his intensity on the field and (yep) his lunch pail attitude off it.

Hall of Fame voters used to view the all-time sack leaderboard with more suspicion than they usually had when looking at tables of numbers. Sacks only became official stats in 1982, and it was not that long ago that good-not-great defenders like Clyde Simmons and Sean Jones were hanging around the top 10, with Deacon Jones and Buck Buchanan stuck forever at zero. But the leaderboard has stabilized.

Greene is third on the all-time sack list, and there is no one within more than 60 sacks of him under the age of 32, so he is going to stay in the top five for many years.

The two players ahead of him (Bruce Smith and Reggie White) are Hall of Famers, as are seven of the next nine players who are not still active. But in the same way Cris Carter had to overcome the notion that all he did was catch touchdowns, we need to see that Greene was more than just a one-dimensional sack specialist.

Anyway, I scoured some Football Outsiders play-by-plays for reliable Greene stats a few years ago. Did you know that Greene recorded 35 tackles on running plays for 1.79 yards per run in 1989? By contrast, Lawrence Taylor recorded 31 run tackles for 3.25 yards per run that year. I have a lot of data like that: Greene performing comparably to Taylor (or better than him) against the run, Greene defending passes and tackling tight ends after the catch, general evidence that a 16-game starter who recorded double-digit sacks 10 times in his career didn't spend rushing downs at the Gatorade table.

None of this should matter, because the argument is silly. The real reasons Greene has been stuck at the finalist stage for four years are:
  • There's a backlog, so everybody has to wait.
  • Greene played several signature seasons for the Los Angeles Rams, which no longer exist, at least as of press time, so it is hard to mount a local groundswell campaign.
  • Those Rams are remembered as playoff stumblebums. We don't remember Greene sacking Randall Cunningham twice in the playoffs in 1989. (Well, I sure as heck do, but never mind.) We don't remember Greene's sack to help lift the Rams above Bill Parcells' Giants. What we remember is Jim Everett crumpling into a tiny ball in a 30-3 loss to the 49ers. Those Rams rubbed off on Greene's reputation.
  • Pro Bowl Counters (folks who start all Hall of Fame discussions by listing a player's All-Pro or Pro Bowl selections) scoff at Greene's five selections without recognizing that Taylor soaked up near-universal acclaim in Greene's best Rams seasons, leaving Greene, Charles Haley, Pat Swilling and a few others to compete for second place every year. Greene's 16.5 sacks failed to earn him a Pro Bowl slot in 1988 because 4.5 of them came in the season finale, a win against the 49ers to launch the Rams into the playoffs. So Greene terrorized Joe Montana and Steve Young for an afternoon and pushed his team into the postseason, but ballots were already being counted, so 30 years later we load up Pro Football Reference and say: "no Pro Bowl, tut-tut."
  • Greene's Steelers lost their one Super Bowl and suffer from comparisons to the 1970s Steelers and the 2000s Steelers.
  • Rams and Steelers voters sympathetic to Greene's cause are also busy trying to wave the Greatest Show on Turf Rams and Steelers like Jerome Bettis through without too much of a wait. Greene is not a top priority for either voting bloc, and even I would try to vote Orlando Pace and Kurt Warner through before banging a table for Greene.
  • Greene's All-Pro season for the 1996 Panthers, who played in the NFC Championship Game, was undercut by his sudden defection to the 49ers the following year. His late-career contract disputes are fresh in many minds; committee members don't often jump at the chance to vote for a mercenary-for-hire who walked away from a playoff team.
So Greene is a guy who lacks a Super Bowl ring, a dynasty and the other things that are beyond a linebacker's control.

All he has are the things that were within his control: 160 sacks, five Pro Bowl appearances, three safeties and more than a decade as one of the NFL's most disruptive defenders, against the run and the pass.

If you are looking for something else, you may be looking at the wrong things.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K86w2lSTm3E&spfreload=10


To read the entire article click the link below.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2527277-the-best-hall-of-fame-argument-for-every-nfl-team
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
39,090
Interesting that they chose him over Bruce or Holt or Pace or Warner. I don't disagree that Greene is an obvious choice to make the hall.
 

SierraRam

Recreational User
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
2,254
Interesting that they chose him over Bruce or Holt or Pace or Warner. I don't disagree that Greene is an obvious choice to make the hall.

All of those are solid choices, but I want to go back a few years and present an argument for the most dominate player (not named Jack Youngblood) on the most dominate defense in Ram history: Larry Lee Brooks

After starting halfway through his rookie season in 1972, Brooks collected 9 sacks in '73, and 11 in '74. He didn't go to his first Pro Bowl until 1976 because of the depth at DT in the NFC (Allen Page, Bob Lily). Still, Larry Brooks went to 5 straight after that while anchoring the best defense statistically in football. (Sorry Dallas, Minnesota, Pittsburgh) Add 4 All-Pro selections to the list. The 76-80 Rams hold records to this day against the run and Larry Brooks was the key in the middle.

upload_2015-8-8_13-9-27.jpeg
upload_2015-8-8_13-9-47.jpeg
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
Greene should go in this coming year. After all the years he's been a finalist, they can't pass on him again!! HE SHOULD HAVE BEAT STRAHAN IN!!
 

HometownBoy

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 17, 2013
Messages
3,527
Name
Aaron
Interesting that they chose him over Bruce or Holt or Pace or Warner. I don't disagree that Greene is an obvious choice to make the hall.
I think they we're trying to go for lesser known, but still deserving thing. Let's be honest here, all four of those guys are shoe-ins and unless they do something that pisses the writers off will probably end up in the Hall eventually.
 

brokeu91

The super shrink
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
5,546
Name
Michael
Kevin Greene was a great player, no doubt about it.

But I would definitely have listed Pace, Warner, Bruce and Holt ahead of him as deserving the Hall of Fame