- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
Brady is a great QB (puke). Brady is missing one of his more important pieces (Gronk). Brady suffers.
Does this = Brady sucks?
Of course not. So why is it when the Rams run through a carousel of receivers and linemen, that it equates to Bradford sucking? That's not an indictment of anyone here, because I'm proud to say we've assembled the class of the internet when it comes to rational thinking and football acumen. But back to the point. If Bradford's best weapon is Amendola, and Amendola gets injured, and Bradford suffers, why does it mean Bradford sucks? And if Bradford's best linemen are essentially all injured, and Bradford suffers, why does it mean Bradford sucks?
Help me connect the dots.