On a team wanting to seriously compete for a Super Bowl? None of the above will ever cut it in my opinion.
A fair point, but based on general collegiate play and whatnot, opinions are at least interesting to converse about.I don't think i've seen enough of any of them to be able to say with any real certainty how good they will be.
I think the same can be said for most here.
.
I agree, and probably should have elaborated further in my last post. I have seen both good and bad things in the short amount of time we have seen each of these guys on field. so i can totally see how any of them really could go either way. It all depends on how they develop, all of them being young guys. If i was to pick one, i'd likely go with Wichmann.A fair point, but based on general collegiate play and whatnot, opinions are at least interesting to converse about.
We signed him to the practice squad, I know it's hard to believe given how much angst was had over him. You'd have thought he was already picked up and became a perennial Pro Bowler the way people wrung their hands over him.I thought we released Battle?
Gave up? We gave up a 5th round pick in 2016. That's not much... in trade value a 5th in "next year's draft" is worth a 6th in "this year's." In effect, we gave up less for him than anyone on the list other than Rhaney.You have to hope Battle is considering what we gave up to get him. Wichmann has a good chance as he's already getting snaps as a backup so that's good for his development.
Yup. Which do you think is most likely to succeed as a starter? Love to hear your case for as many as you think in the discussion part of this whole shebang.We can only vote for 1?