- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,396
This is the million dollar question which position makes the most sense to instantly help the team?
LT - you get a Tunsil if available and that is a better Whit - you kick Jackson inside to LG and the run game improves and same with pass pro.
G - not a lot of heavy hitters out there but a major upgrade helps with pass pro but we still have an untested in Jackson at LT
RB - several options out there but I have never been the believer it is the RBs fault. Without a better OL I doubt a RB makes a substantial difference - maybe CMC because of versatility but not sure how he would fair on this team. I remember when Gurley had both a great and bad OL with a bad OL he was ineffective.
Lastly an OLB - there are several really good options but will they help us? Pass rush, sacks and pressures will increase and they will solidify the D against better teams as witnessed by last year's playoffs/Superbowl - the caveat last year is Whit.
My thoughts we can get another RB inexpensively if we want one. There is no G that is a massive upgrade so again if we want one we can get it inexpensively.
Here is the question - do we ride with Jackson and wait for Edwards, Shelton to come back? Was that combo ever good enough and with Jackson at LT will it be good enough. The only name out there is Tunsil and it is a low percentage that he would be available but if so I think we choose him over an OLB. This way we solidify the OL the ppg instantly improves the run game improves etc. All of us want an OLB me included, but an OLB doesn't help us score points and that is the name of the game and it is definitely not our skill players that is holding us back. Please remember we had to come from behind in the SF playoff game and Superbowl and we were able to do it because the OL was stable.
What are your thoughts?
LT - you get a Tunsil if available and that is a better Whit - you kick Jackson inside to LG and the run game improves and same with pass pro.
G - not a lot of heavy hitters out there but a major upgrade helps with pass pro but we still have an untested in Jackson at LT
RB - several options out there but I have never been the believer it is the RBs fault. Without a better OL I doubt a RB makes a substantial difference - maybe CMC because of versatility but not sure how he would fair on this team. I remember when Gurley had both a great and bad OL with a bad OL he was ineffective.
Lastly an OLB - there are several really good options but will they help us? Pass rush, sacks and pressures will increase and they will solidify the D against better teams as witnessed by last year's playoffs/Superbowl - the caveat last year is Whit.
My thoughts we can get another RB inexpensively if we want one. There is no G that is a massive upgrade so again if we want one we can get it inexpensively.
Here is the question - do we ride with Jackson and wait for Edwards, Shelton to come back? Was that combo ever good enough and with Jackson at LT will it be good enough. The only name out there is Tunsil and it is a low percentage that he would be available but if so I think we choose him over an OLB. This way we solidify the OL the ppg instantly improves the run game improves etc. All of us want an OLB me included, but an OLB doesn't help us score points and that is the name of the game and it is definitely not our skill players that is holding us back. Please remember we had to come from behind in the SF playoff game and Superbowl and we were able to do it because the OL was stable.
What are your thoughts?