What's left for Rams after playoff elimination?/Wagoner

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
What's left for Rams after playoff elimination?
By Nick Wagoner

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/25062/whats-left-for-rams-after-playoff-elimination

EARTH CITY, Mo. -- The St. Louis Rams haven't really been in the playoff mix for weeks, but they were at least mathematically still in it entering Sunday's slate of games.

By the time the day was over, however, the Rams were eliminated. The Seattle Seahawks' win over the Cleveland Browns and the Minnesota Vikings' triumph over the Chicago Bears voided any far-flung playoff dreams the Rams might have harbored.

So the Rams now have two games remaining on the 2015 slate with trips to Seattle and San Francisco to close out the season. St. Louis will train in Napa, California, between those two contests.

With the postseason officially off the table, here's a look at what's left for the Rams to accomplish, as well as a few modest suggestions for things to try (or not try) in the season's final two games:

If somehow the Rams can find a way to beat the Seahawks next week, they would go play the San Francisco 49ers with a chance to get to 8-8 for the first time under coach Jeff Fisher and the first time since 2006. It would also mean they finished the season on a four-game winning streak, which would be the longest one they've had under Fisher, and give them their best record in Fisher's four years as the coach. It's not much consolation for again finishing in the land of mediocrity, but some sort of tangible improvement would be welcome.

At 6-8, the reality is that losing their final two games probably still wouldn't get the Rams in position to draft one of the top quarterbacks. They finished 6-10 a year ago and drafted No. 10 overall. Clearly, they made good on that pick (running back Todd Gurley), but we're past the point in which losing is going to help their draft position in such a way that they could get the quarterback they desperately need.

There aren't a whole lot of statistical milestones left for individual Rams to reach. Gurley has already hit 1,000 yards, though 1,200 would be a nice accomplishment. Linebacker James Laurinaitis has already reached 1,000 career tackles and set the franchise record. Receiver Wes Welker got his 900th career reception a couple of weeks ago. One thing that would be a nice step forward, though, would be to get Gurley another touchdown. It would give him 10 for the season and give the Rams two players with double-digit touchdowns in a season for the first time since 2006 (with Gurley joining receiver Tavon Austin). It would also probably help Gurley's case for the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year award.

Elsewhere on the individual accomplishment front, there's still a chance that defensive tackle Aaron Donald could find himself in the mix for the Defensive Player of the Year award. In my opinion, he should at least be one of the top three contenders already, but he could help his cause by finishing strong. Donald has 11 sacks on the season, and if he could somehow get two in each of the next two games, he could get to 15 for the year. That's essentially unheard of for a player at his position. He also has a chance to get to 20 tackles for loss this season, though he still needs four more to get there. If he managed to get to 15 sacks and 20 tackles for loss, it would be awfully hard to deny his place among the best defenders in the NFL.

The outside cries to allow rookie Sean Mannion to play quarterback began weeks ago, but it hasn't happened yet save for mop-up duty in the loss to the Cincinnati Bengals. The Rams have been hesitant to allow Mannion to play, as he has been inactive since Case Keenum returned from concussion. I absolutely understand the desire to protect Mannion since he'd be playing behind a patchwork offensive line and he hasn't had many reps in practice. But how about a happy medium of allowing Mannion to be the No. 2 quarterback on game days so that if the game gets out of hand or something happens to Keenum, he can get some much-needed work? The truth is that even if Mannion started the final three or four games, it still wouldn't have been enough to judge whether the Rams needed to spend a high pick on a quarterback. But it would still serve Mannion well to get live reps in the final two weeks if the situation presents itself. That can't happen if he's in street clothes on game day.

The Rams are set to open linebacker Alec Ogletree's practice window to come back from his ankle/leg injury next week with an eye toward the possibility of having him available for the finale in San Francisco. I tend to think that probably won't happen, but even if Ogletree seems like he's rounding into shape, there really isn't much reason that it should. Let him practice and get a head start on his return for next year, but there's no reason to risk a setback in a meaningless game.

It's somewhat shocking that the only pending free agent the Rams have signed to this point is quarterback Nick Foles, a deal that looks particularly bad now. But the Rams have a lot of key free agents coming up after this year, including defensive starters Rodney McLeod, Mark Barron, Janoris Jenkins and Trumaine Johnson. Johnson could make a run at the league interceptions lead with a couple of big games and is only driving his price higher. At this point, many players probably prefer to wait and test the market, but it wouldn't be bad business if the Rams could lock up a few players before it reaches that point.
 

RamDino

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
2,821
I was hoping Brockers would be signed by now.
 

JackDRams

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,524
Name
Jack
I was hoping Brockers would be signed by now.

He's already under contract for 2016. Don't expect an extension any time soon. He's the last of our worries. We need to take care of our secondary before half of it leaves.
 

VegasRam

Give your dog a hug.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
3,930
Name
Doug
Gosh...I feel so much better informed now. :palm:
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
The Rams can still Finish at least Tied, Div. Record wise, with Ariz. and Finish with A 7-5 Record in the Conf. To go with a "None Losing" 8-8 Record for 2015!
This is not what any of us expected this season, but after a 5 game losing streak, it's something to build on!!
And who here wouldn't want to kick the 49ers, and Sea-Hags Asses one more time this year, just for the Fun of it!!?!

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!!
GO RAMS!!
addon.jpg
 

RamDino

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
2,821
He's already under contract for 2016. Don't expect an extension any time soon. He's the last of our worries. We need to take care of our secondary before half of it leaves.

Agree about the secondary. But when the Rams exercised their fifth-year option on Brockers, I thought that generally meant that the team wanted to sign him to a new contract.
 

Ballhawk

Please don't confuse my experience for pessimism!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
2,283
Name
NPW
Trying to win the last two games just to make our coaches look better instead of using said games to evaluate QBs is why we never get better.IMHO