- Joined
- May 9, 2018
- Messages
- 5,390
What can we infer from Cam Akers’ apparent soon to be “active” status?
I think it is a question with a two-part answer.
1. That he is healthy enough to play without creating an undo risk of re-injury. That part is purely a medical position that can only be assessed by team doctors. I presume that, in making this assessment, Cam’s opinion and desire/willingness to take on the risk of returning were not significant factors. I also presume (or, at least, strongly hope) that no team doctor would risk his or her professional status and reputation by signing off on the return of a player who is likely to suffer a re-injury. So…on this issue, I’m not too worried.
2. That the Rams and Cam believe he can be effective. This is less of a scientific issue. While the doctors no doubt have an opinion, on this issue the beliefs of the team and the player can be the deciding factors. Are they right? I sure hope so, but it remains to be seen.
I think it is a question with a two-part answer.
1. That he is healthy enough to play without creating an undo risk of re-injury. That part is purely a medical position that can only be assessed by team doctors. I presume that, in making this assessment, Cam’s opinion and desire/willingness to take on the risk of returning were not significant factors. I also presume (or, at least, strongly hope) that no team doctor would risk his or her professional status and reputation by signing off on the return of a player who is likely to suffer a re-injury. So…on this issue, I’m not too worried.
2. That the Rams and Cam believe he can be effective. This is less of a scientific issue. While the doctors no doubt have an opinion, on this issue the beliefs of the team and the player can be the deciding factors. Are they right? I sure hope so, but it remains to be seen.