- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 2,635
- Name
- zoomy
For a while it has been highly debated about the QB situation. Who should be starting?
Almost every post and thread is focused on why Fish is wrong and why Goff should be starting.
To be clear I am on the start Goff bandwagon and even told my wife to plan a movie date during the game this week. I will be hoping for the Rams to win but I just am not going to invest the time and energy into watching the game until I can watch Goff.
This is because I know Goff is the future, whether he struggles or not, he is the future. I also really liked what I saw from him as a prospect.
The reasons I think Fish may be right:
1. Having time to take in the NFL game and all the nuances - all the while being on a very young team.
2. Keenum, although limited physically, has tremendous leadership qualities. For a young guy like Goff to be apart of that process with Keenum will be great for his future.
3. While Goff took a beating in college. He is now up against even bigger guys and that beating could take a real toll.
4. The run game is just not working. I know teams are daring Keenum (which has a lot to do with his height), but there are other problems that go with the run game. Sticking a rookie QB in a place where the Oline cannot create holes could just be disastrous.
I don't want this thread to be a whole debate about why we should be starting Goff. I want to hear some of the great reasons that Fish is right. I remember very clearly when GB cut Favre in favor of Rodgers. There were so many Packers fans enraged, yet so many happy.
Almost every post and thread is focused on why Fish is wrong and why Goff should be starting.
To be clear I am on the start Goff bandwagon and even told my wife to plan a movie date during the game this week. I will be hoping for the Rams to win but I just am not going to invest the time and energy into watching the game until I can watch Goff.
This is because I know Goff is the future, whether he struggles or not, he is the future. I also really liked what I saw from him as a prospect.
The reasons I think Fish may be right:
1. Having time to take in the NFL game and all the nuances - all the while being on a very young team.
2. Keenum, although limited physically, has tremendous leadership qualities. For a young guy like Goff to be apart of that process with Keenum will be great for his future.
3. While Goff took a beating in college. He is now up against even bigger guys and that beating could take a real toll.
4. The run game is just not working. I know teams are daring Keenum (which has a lot to do with his height), but there are other problems that go with the run game. Sticking a rookie QB in a place where the Oline cannot create holes could just be disastrous.
I don't want this thread to be a whole debate about why we should be starting Goff. I want to hear some of the great reasons that Fish is right. I remember very clearly when GB cut Favre in favor of Rodgers. There were so many Packers fans enraged, yet so many happy.