- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 7,182
- Name
- Hugh
I guess I'll continue to post updates on Bountygate case here...
On Wednesday of this week the Judge requested that NFLPA lawyers demonstrate that they do not have a "conflict of interest" because she [the judge] is clearly frustrated by lack of settlement talks between player's lawyers & NFL lawyers. Judge thinks previous hostilities between both side's lawyers is keeping them from the settlement table, and therefore hindering an out of court settlement. It seems the judge would rather have the party's settle then forcing her to make a legal ruling.
On Wednesday of this week the Judge requested that NFLPA lawyers demonstrate that they do not have a "conflict of interest" because she [the judge] is clearly frustrated by lack of settlement talks between player's lawyers & NFL lawyers. Judge thinks previous hostilities between both side's lawyers is keeping them from the settlement table, and therefore hindering an out of court settlement. It seems the judge would rather have the party's settle then forcing her to make a legal ruling.
@SportsLawGuy
Judge Berrigan just ordered NFLPA Bounty counsel to show cause by noon tmrw whether they should be disqualified for conflict of interest
@SportsLawGuy
Judge Berrigan: "it appears to the Ct that there is longstanding acrimony among all of the attorneys representing all of the parties..."
@SportsLawGuy
"that predates these disputes and that the Court believes is contrary to the interests of all four players"