Wagoner: Rams Would Not OWE conditional pick in 2016 if SB is Traded

[RamBill]

Nick Wagoner ‏@nwagoner

Question that's been asked a lot just answered by @AshleyFoxESPN on NFL Insiders: Rams would NOT owe conditional picks if SB traded again.

 

[Psycho_X]

Excellent, deal looks better and better.

 

[WestCoastRam]

Yeah Psycho, with that little bit of info, I can't see how we could turn down this trade.

Kinda hope they flip him now as we'd be guaranteed the 2nd.

 

[jrry32]

That's awesome.

 

[-X-]

Well that's just common sense. We didn't make a deal with anyone but Philly.

 

[DR RAM]

Good news, and as convoluted as that trade was, didn't make common sense to me. Makes me happy though. Oh, the simple things in life.

 

[dieterbrock]

Of course the team that trades FOR him may require Philly to include conditional picks...

 

[goosekilla]

Yeah Psycho, with that little bit of info, I can't see how we could turn down this trade.

Kinda hope they flip him now as we'd be guaranteed the 2nd.

We're already guaranteed the second regardless.

 

[Big Game]

Yeah Psycho, with that little bit of info, I can't see how we could turn down this trade.

Kinda hope they flip him now as we'd be guaranteed the 2nd.

That's how i feel i hope they trade him hahahha

 

[WestCoastRam]

Correction: guaranteed the second with no return postage.