- Joined
- Nov 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,961
- Name
- Phil
Watching the Patriots offense run methodically through and around the Steelers made me wonder if the trajectory Jeff Fisher's improving Rams were on was sabotaged by his impatience surrounding Josh McDaniels.
The Rams looked MUCH better than the team he inherited. The offense was clearly having troubles grasping JMs offense. But...
What if JF didn't punt the idea of an improved, exciting offense, and instead showed the kind of patience shown for, say, Robinson?!
True we had/have no Brady at QB, but in retrospect Keenum looked far better in the offense-from-hell that he seemed to at the time. What might he have done with a better-than-middle-school offense?
So yeah, I wonder what we'd look like if instead of reverting to the "0 yards and a cloud of dust" approach, Fisher had stuck with McDaniels. It may be that we'd now be "stuck" with JF as well, with those extra draft picks shoring up our defense or giving us more solid WRs.
On second thought, in the long run, it may all work out for the best.
The Rams looked MUCH better than the team he inherited. The offense was clearly having troubles grasping JMs offense. But...
What if JF didn't punt the idea of an improved, exciting offense, and instead showed the kind of patience shown for, say, Robinson?!
True we had/have no Brady at QB, but in retrospect Keenum looked far better in the offense-from-hell that he seemed to at the time. What might he have done with a better-than-middle-school offense?
So yeah, I wonder what we'd look like if instead of reverting to the "0 yards and a cloud of dust" approach, Fisher had stuck with McDaniels. It may be that we'd now be "stuck" with JF as well, with those extra draft picks shoring up our defense or giving us more solid WRs.
On second thought, in the long run, it may all work out for the best.