Well sorry to disappoint you but I agree with him,if you insist on the four pillars thing ,you'll miss out on way too many talented players,it's like mojo sez, it's even more evident in the NBA.albefree69 said:I think his premise is nonsensical. That's the kind of thing you say when you don't actually have anything to say.
But then I don't particularly like Softli so there's that.
GO RAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thordaddy wrote:
Well sorry to disappoint you but I agree with him,if you insist on the four pillars thing ,you'll miss out on way too many talented players,it's like mojo sez, it's even more evident in the NBA.
Now that is not to say if you have two players ranked the same you don't go for the Boy Scout,certainly if he's got talent and character , but face it the last three Presidents of the United States have smoked pot and snorted some blow,it's not the damned kiss of death so many of these "problems" are random chance.
I'd bet well over half the players drafted this year have at least smoked pot so the diff. is who got caught.
X trying to leave early:
Hmmmmmm.
Well, alright then.
Pack it up boys.
We're outta here.
mojorizen7 said:I dont know about the NFL(i think it may be true) .... but you definately can't win in David Sterns NBA with a bunch of choir boys...and i wouldn't even try.
Albe mooching off of X:
So you're not staying for the party?
Can I have your share?
GO RAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
X said:Hmmmmmm.
So you can't win with Bradford, Long (both of them), Laurinaitis, Quinn, Saffold, Tavon, Pettis, Finnegan (never been in trouble), Richardson and Pead?
Or with Warner, Bruce, Holt, Faulk, Proehl, Hakim, Pace, et al?
Well, alright then.
Pack it up boys.
We're outta here.
:rofl:X screwing with my mind:
Albe mooching off of X:
Plenty? Who?LesBaker said:mojorizen7 said:I dont know about the NFL(i think it may be true) .... but you definately can't win in David Sterns NBA with a bunch of choir boys...and i wouldn't even try.
San Antonio Spurs.
Miami Heat.
And there are others....Plenty.
:twisted:albefree69 said:Thordaddy wrote:
Well sorry to disappoint you but I agree with him,if you insist on the four pillars thing ,you'll miss out on way too many talented players,it's like mojo sez, it's even more evident in the NBA.
Now that is not to say if you have two players ranked the same you don't go for the Boy Scout,certainly if he's got talent and character , but face it the last three Presidents of the United States have smoked pot and snorted some blow,it's not the damned kiss of death so many of these "problems" are random chance.
I'd bet well over half the players drafted this year have at least smoked pot so the diff. is who got caught.
I'm in agreement with most of what you said. Just because I think his premise is stupid doesn't mean I don't think the opposite isn't stupid too. The whole question of being a good boy or a bad boy is immaterial. Having talent and playing as a team is what's needed for success IMO. That can be done with a mixture of both types or teams comprising predominantly bad guys or good guys.
I think the teams that have a lot of bad guys are going to have better parties though. :sure:
GO RAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Selassie I said:While I don't often agree with Softli, I share his thoughts on this one.
The most important ingredient for an NFL player is talent. There are many other qualities that help, but talent tops them all if you ask me. Pick your players on some other trait first and let me know how that turns out for ya.
Even though commandante goodell is trying to make it otherwise,,, the NFL is a gladiator sport. You need some "BAD MEN" to come out on top,,, and I mean BAD in the BAD sense of the word.
mojorizen7 said:Plenty? Who?LesBaker said:mojorizen7 said:I dont know about the NFL(i think it may be true) .... but you definately can't win in David Sterns NBA with a bunch of choir boys...and i wouldn't even try.
San Antonio Spurs.
Miami Heat.
And there are others....Plenty.
Choir boys = soft,clean and friendly no?
I admire strong,tough basketball teams with a nice mix of superstars,role players and thugs. Thats what you need IMO.
Popovich teams have never been either,and you can make an argument for Miami....but i'll just strawman the debate to include teams with marquee appeal only :ww:
Since 1980 only NINE different teams have won the NBA championship. Thats nine different teams in 33 years. That includes a one time title from Dallas and Miami both. So,if you were to exclude those 2 teams amongst the past 33 yrs you're looking at only 7 different championship teams in 31 years. RIDICULOUS
David Stern has been commissioner since 1984. He is responsible for the success,the popularity,the wealth,the predictability and the corruption of that league.
Stern is a crook IMO. I dont know how he survived the referee scandal of 2007. It was swept under the rug almost as cleanly as Spygate.
He has announced he will step down next February 2014. It might be interesting again...IDK
The NBA is a garbage league. Corrupt, without parity and IMO a foregone conclusion every year. Pfft...
Started watching in 1981 and stopped watching in 2009.
Sorry for the tangent Les...i'm quite passionate about a sport i used to love years ago.