- Joined
- Nov 22, 2017
- Messages
- 1,321
Gurley is the least of this teams worries.
Gurley is the least of this teams worries.
You don't get to be 2nd in rushing by not being a part of the plan. I understand you would have run Gurley 35 times and passed 35 times, but sometimes you have to take what's given to you. Operative word being "take".How would we know.
He's hardly part of the game plan LOL.
You don't get to be 2nd in rushing by not being a part of the plan. I understand you would have run Gurley 35 times and passed 35 times, but sometimes you have to take what's given to you. Operative word being "take".
Well, now that Kingsbury has taken the USC job, McVay is probably looking for the next best thing as a consultant. Keep your phone charged and close by!When there is no threat of the Run play action doesn't work girly needs to run more than 11 or 12 times per game.
McVay is calling plays like he is found by 30 points and still getting cute in the red zone
Yeah. Fuck that guy.McVay is calling plays like he is down by 30 points and still getting cute in the red zone
Yeah. freak that guy.
Anyone know what Spags is doing these days?
Well no shit. I’m simply giving you a comparison. Spagnuolo won 10 games in 3 years. McVay topped that his first year. So while his play calling may not be 100% perfect every game, he’s certainly earned the latitude to design this offense as he sees fit. Even if we, as genius play callers ourselves, don’t agree with his methods.That's nothing remotely like what I meant or what I said.
So nevermind.
Well, you could run on one less cylinder for a while (less a rushing game?) ... or you could take apart the motor and replace that piston.I remember some debate a while back over who the Rams could least afford to lose. Most of us thought is was Goff. But I'm starting to see what happens without Gurley. Goff might be the carburetor that keeps the machine running smoothly when he's right. But Gurley's the piston that runs the machine. A machine doesn't run without pistons.
Well no crap. I’m simply giving you a comparison. Spagnuolo won 10 games in 3 years. McVay topped that his first year. So while his play calling may not be 100% perfect every game, he’s certainly earned the latitude to design this offense as he sees fit. Even if we, as genius play callers ourselves, don’t agree with his methods.
Well, you could run on one less cylinder for a while (less a rushing game?) ... or you could take apart the motor and replace that piston.
But a piston is a piston, it either will work or won't with your crankshaft, with the right fit, the only variation would be a weight difference, which is really a balance issue, and then whether or not the replacement piston will stand up to the pressure like the old did/didn't. So was Malcom Brown a heavier piston with the same fitment that caused a timing issue with the engine swapped in and out with varying degrees of success until it broke due to being run at an RPM and heat that it wasn't specified for?
But what if Todd Gurley were instead a carburetor, could you replace his brand with the other carburetors you had on hand to fit your intake manifold, giving such noticeable performance variations even after properly adjusting the jet(alternative offensive game plan) for your motor?
I mean, it is possible to run poorly less a cylinder (empty backfield) but without a working carburetor, all of your cylinders are kind of messed up. Now I'm confused
What about a flywheel? Could running backs be flywheels that work with performance variation dependent on the clutch they are mated with? I mean if the clutch was the offensive line.
Hanging out with The Fisher King of course!Yeah. freak that guy.
Anyone know what Spags is doing these days?
You don't get to be 2nd in rushing by not being a part of the plan. I understand you would have run Gurley 35 times and passed 35 times, but sometimes you have to take what's given to you. Operative word being "take".