Judging by the way Snead talked about him in Behind the Grind ep. 2, I'd throw Kobie Turner into the mix here as well. He and McVay seem to love the guy. He may not play as much initially because of the guys ahead of him but should be a good long-term pick.One point they made that did occur right after the draft was, with 14 picks, if they hit on half of them, it's like hitting on a normal draft completely. And that NEVER happens. Take Bennett out of the equation for the time being and say Avila, Allen, Nacua, Hodges-Tomlinson and Evans (RB) are hits. And two of either Young, Hampton or McClendon. That's 7 at important positions. It would be phenominal and have, like they say, an immediate impact on the record. Though it's unrealistic, I'm hoping they hit on 8 or 9 with the punter. Couple that with good team health and terrific production from important vets like Kupp, Fuller, Donald, Akers, Jones, Higbee and Stafford and we might actually accept Snead's differentiation between remodel and rebuild. Of course we can have that hope in June.......
I’d rather listen to Jourdan for the reason that I stated above.This is a MUST WATCH for all Rams fans. Kollmann always kils it, but this is just really really thorough. As much as I love Jourdan, her podcast pales greatly in comparison to this.... And he is not even a Rams guy, just a really good football analyst.
I subscribe to him and somehow missed this yesterday, so thank you @PhillyRam for posting!!
...
We had 14 draft picks. With a 50% hit rate, that's the equivalent of hitting on every draft pick in a normal draft. Which would be transformative to any team.
I just think the term "hit" gets thrown around a lot with picks but is never really defined. It's tough to define it too. Point is if they "hit" on 7 picks this year iaw what is commonly accepted as hitting on a pick for the round he was taken in, it probably won't be all that great a draft.A 50% hit rate is good. What teams hit every round, every year? None. I think the idea if they hit on 7, that's as good as any team has done, probably better.
What excites me is if they do hit on 8 or 9 guys and they actually are ready to contribute in 2024, with the $60M plus in cap space(they will add more cap room with more needed cuts and restructures next yr) they will be in position to make a serious run next yr while probably be an entertaining young team to watch this yr.The eternal optimist in me believes we should have light to normal range of injuries this season, especially after the complete derailing of the Horns Express last year. We need our seasoned veterans and 2nd to 3rd year players stepping up early on. If our top rookies start coming uh bro their own by the 2nd half of the season, things can get really interesting come playoff time.
Absolutely.I just think the term "hit" gets thrown around a lot with picks but is never really defined. It's tough to define it too. Point is if they "hit" on 7 picks this year iaw what is commonly accepted as hitting on a pick for the round he was taken in, it probably won't be all that great a draft.
It's the top guys who change fortunes in the NFL. So IMO the Rams taking shots at 14 players was probably more about trying to unearth diamonds than them planning to just hit on 50% of the picks.
If Avila ends up being a perennial pro bowler for example we'll be in business. From there it's a good chance this draft will end up being a great one. If not then they'll need someone else to grow into that type of pick or this will end up being a mediocre mass overhaul type group.
Well...here is a list of recent starters on Rams playoff teams & a SB team that were obtained after rd 3...and they have a number of rd 3 guys as well. Now sure, some like Nick Scott took more than 2 yrs to start, but they all contributed fairly early on in some aspects as a role player, spot starter, or special teamer.Absolutely.
Reality is you get your starters from the first few rounds and hope to get complimentary players from the 4th on down, with the odd surprise now and then. Unless you believe your talent evaluation is other worldly. And lord knows all too often these guys get reminded that's not the case.
So they did take 14 chances rather than 8. They're not gonna unearth 9 quality starters. But they've got better odds with 14 lottery tickets. 50%? They're shooting for 100%. I'd take Avila, Young and Evans (the RB). If Turner and Davis are decent contributors, this draft will be phemominal. Hodges- Tomlinson is the guy who would put it over the top though. And they've found some diamonds in the 6th in previous drafts.
I'm hopeful but encouraged and can't wait to see what unfolds in camp and preseason.
That's cool. I listen to her from time to time, but her and her cohost are like nails on a chalkboard to me mostly. To each their own.I’d rather listen to Jourdan for the reason that I stated above.