The regression of the St. Louis Rams

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

News Bot

01001000 01101001
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
2,624
Name
News Bot
Nick Wagoner
<a class="postlink" href="http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/1295/the-regression-of-the-rams" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/p ... f-the-rams</a>

nfl_a_jeff-fisher_mb_576x324.jpg



ST. LOUIS -- Signs of progress for the St. Louis Rams have been few and far between for most of the past decade.

A drastic improvement to 7-8-1 in 2012 provided some real hope that the sinking ship that was the U.S.S. Rams was finally going to come up for air.

This season was supposed to provide more signs of progress, to provide tangible evidence that there is indeed a light at the end of the tunnel down in the deepest depths of football purgatory.

After another complete no-show in Thursday night’s 35-11 beatdown at the hands of the San Francisco 49ers, it’s blatantly clear that somewhere along the way progression turned into regression.

“Everybody in the building is disappointed,” defensive end Chris Long said. “Our fans are pissed. We’re pissed.”

Dallas manhandled St. Louis last week, but this week we were told the Rams would bounce back. One game can be a hiccup, two can be a trend. In retrospect, it might be generous to not extend that to three given how Atlanta dominated the Rams in the first half of their Week 2 matchup.

Playing a division rival on a short week on a prime-time stage offered St. Louis a chance to recover. The 49ers flew halfway across the country for this game and played without linebackers Patrick Willis and Aldon Smith. They, too, were coming off a poor performance.

If nothing else, the 49ers appeared to be an opponent the Rams could use to get back on track. The only problem is that the Rams’ current track isn’t the one they seemed to put themselves on a year ago.

It’s not so much that the Rams are carrying a 1-3 record that’s alarming. It’s how they’ve arrived here.

The defense that kept the Rams in games by getting key stops, rushing the passer and slowing down opposing run games? It’s now a group with no direction other than backward.

San Francisco didn’t even hint that it would do anything but run Frank Gore over and over. No matter, Gore did whatever he wanted on his way to 153 yards and a touchdown.

That performance didn’t even match the 175 yards Dallas’ DeMarco Murray put up last week.

“It’s disgusting. Really, it just is disgusting,” Long said. “When you give up that many yards in the run game, there’s a lot of things going on and we have got to fix a lot of things.”

The 49ers were without injured wideout Michael Crabtree, and tight end Vernon Davis is playing hurt, leaving Anquan Boldin as the team’s only proven receiving threat. That didn’t stop Boldin from posting 90 yards and a touchdown.

Things certainly aren’t much better on the other side of the ball. The Rams spent big money and draft capital to give quarterback Sam Bradford the pieces needed to make the offense his own.

The return of offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer was supposed to give the offense the continuity it needed to take the next step. The Rams signed tight end Jared Cook and drafted wide receiver Tavon Austin with the belief that the duo would more than be able to compensate for slot receiver Danny Amendola's exit.

At running back, the Rams mostly stood pat, steadfast in the belief that some combination of Daryl Richardson and Isaiah Pead could replace the departed Steven Jackson.

None of those suppositions have proved true in the first four weeks. The running game, in particular, is a complete non-starter. The hottest debate in St. Louis right now might be whether the running game isn’t working because of a lack of blocking or the lack of a starting-caliber back.

The answer is probably both. Whatever it is that the Rams call a running game right now carried 19 times for 18 yards. The longest run of the night came from rookie Benny Cunningham, who gained 7 yards on a late carry. The 49ers had 219 rushing yards Thursday night; the Rams have 189 in four games.

“We had two less carries than they did at halftime for no yards, and that’s pretty much the issue we’re facing right now,” coach Jeff Fisher said. “Because everything spins off of that.”

The list of red flags piling up around the Rams right now is too long to fit this space. Penalties continue to be a problem (they had eight for 82 yards), and what might be the second-hottest debate in St. Louis is whether the offense or the defense has been worse on third down.

Thursday night, the Rams converted three third downs on 17 attempts (17.6 percent) and allowed the 49ers to convert 6 of 15 attempts (40 percent).

The Rams are again the youngest team in the league, a fact that they insist will not be used as an excuse. It shouldn’t be. The Rams were 2-2 after four games a year ago with a team that also was the youngest in the NFL.

That was the team that looked poised to deliver this franchise back into contention. Through four weeks this season, that seems like nothing but a distant memory.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,651
Fucking. Ouch.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
“We had two less carries than they did at halftime for no yards, and that’s pretty much the issue we’re facing right now,” coach Jeff Fisher said. “Because everything spins off of that.”

Ayup. All this time spent trying to establish the run via "long hand-offs" (dump-offs, bubble screens, quick slants) just isn't working either. If a 4-man rush can stop the run, and we have to face 7 in coverage, then this team isn't going to win much this year at all. The Jackson thing is now hand-sight. He didn't want to split time, he wanted to go to a more established team to finish out his career, and he's injured again anyway. Richardson, Pead, Stacy, Cunningham, Daniels ... it doesn't matter. This O-line can't win at the point of attack.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Psycho_X said:
X said:
If a 4-man rush can stop the run,


And get to the QB. Defenses can do anything they want against us.
Yeah, pretty much. Trench warfare. Ineffective against a 4-man rush, ineffective using a 4-man rush.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,092
.

it's hard for a rb to make any yards when as soon as he gets the handoff all he sees is a sea of the opposition's uniforms.

just look at the gaping holes murray and gore ran through. you don't think the rams rbs could have huge runs through holes like that?

.
 

ramsince62

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
2,582
X said:
“We had two less carries than they did at halftime for no yards, and that’s pretty much the issue we’re facing right now,” coach Jeff Fisher said. “Because everything spins off of that.”

Ayup. All this time spent trying to establish the run via "long hand-offs" (dump-offs, bubble screens, quick slants) just isn't working either. If a 4-man rush can stop the run, and we have to face 7 in coverage, then this team isn't going to win much this year at all. The Jackson thing is now hand-sight. He didn't want to split time, he wanted to go to a more established team to finish out his career, and he's injured again anyway. Richardson, Pead, Stacy, Cunningham, Daniels ... it doesn't matter. This O-line can't win at the point of attack.[/quote]

Neither can the D!
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,288
Name
Burger man
kurtfaulk said:
.

it's hard for a rb to make any yards when as soon as he gets the handoff all he sees is a sea of the opposition's uniforms.

just look at the gaping holes murray and gore ran through. you don't think the rams rbs could have huge runs through holes like that?

.

This is where my frustration with the scheme comes from. Where are the running plays in which we pull the guards?

Why is EVERY running play a mono-on-mono affair?
 

Pho Kadat

Rookie
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
180
CGI_Ram said:
kurtfaulk said:
.

it's hard for a rb to make any yards when as soon as he gets the handoff all he sees is a sea of the opposition's uniforms.

just look at the gaping holes murray and gore ran through. you don't think the rams rbs could have huge runs through holes like that?

.

This is where my frustration with the scheme comes from. Where are the running plays in which we pull the guards?

Why is EVERY running play a mono-on-mono affair?

I saw at least one play where Dahl kicked out to the left and the back cut back to the right where Cook whiffed on a block. The running was eaten alive. Having two poor blocking TEs might be at least one of our problems in the running game. Maybe we do need to bring in a dedicated blocking TE or even go so far as adding a true fullback to the roster. I know the FB is being phased out of the league but this team needs to generate a ground game.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,651
Pho Kadat said:
CGI_Ram said:
kurtfaulk said:
.

it's hard for a rb to make any yards when as soon as he gets the handoff all he sees is a sea of the opposition's uniforms.

just look at the gaping holes murray and gore ran through. you don't think the rams rbs could have huge runs through holes like that?

.

This is where my frustration with the scheme comes from. Where are the running plays in which we pull the guards?

Why is EVERY running play a mono-on-mono affair?

I saw at least one play where Dahl kicked out to the left and the back cut back to the right where Cook whiffed on a block. The running was eaten alive. Having two poor blocking TEs might be at least one of our problems in the running game. Maybe we do need to bring in a dedicated blocking TE or even go so far as adding a true fullback to the roster. I know the FB is being phased out of the league but this team needs to generate a ground game.



I saw the same damn thing. Cook was basically pattycake blocking on run plays and then acting like he was going out on a route!!!??? This happened multiple times I might add. It wasn't him trying to block second level either, because the run went to the opposite side each time. Bith times his man tracked down the rb and made an easy tackle. Ugh.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2