- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
http://247sports.com/Article/Rearranging-the-NFL-divisions-37732393
Not every current division alignment in the NFL makes geographic sense, but is that a bad thing or a good thing?
(Photo: Photo Illustration by Ted Hyman, 247Sports)
It's always fun to play "what if" when it comes to division alignment and imagine what your team's division would be like if it had different teams. But it can also serve as a reminder that maybe things don't need to be changed.
We tried to take a look at what might happen if NFL divisions were moved around to put the teams closer to each other on the map. After sorting it all out and somewhat randomly assigning teams a conference, the results came out somewhat mixed.
AFC East
Baltimore Ravens
Buffalo Bills
Carolina Panthers
Washington Redskins
There's a couple divisions that don't mesh as well geographically as others due to an uneven amount of teams in certain regions of the country, and this is one of them. Baltimore and Washington certainly make geographic sense, but Buffalo gets caught between our picks for how we shaped the AFC North and NFC East, while Carolina is left hanging out there after shaping the AFC and NFC South. What's left makes for kind of an unappealing division.
AFC North
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Detroit
Pittsburgh
This turned out to be almost the same as the current AFC North with the exception of the switch of Baltimore and Detroit. The Lions would fit in well here, actually, at least in terms of rivalries. Detroit already shares divisions with Cleveland in other sports, plus there would be that Michigan-Ohio thing going on. There may not be two neighboring states in this country that dislike each other as much as those two.
AFC South
Atlanta
Jacksonville
Miami
Tampa Bay
There wouldn't be many frequent flyer miles to be had in this Florida-heavy division. There might be a low number of interesting games too, at least until the Bucs and Jags started to get better.
(Photo: Photo Illustration by Ted Hyman, 247Sports)
AFC West
Arizona
Denver
Kansas City
St. Louis
Kansas City and St. Louis are sitting there in the middle of the country, not quite east or north enough to be in the AFC or NFC North and not quite south enough to be in the AFC or NFC South. They're actually not as far west as Dallas and Houston, but those two teams are needed in the south. So the Chiefs and Rams stay out west.
NFC East
New England Patriots
New York Giants
New York Jets
Philadelphia Eagles
Well, this would certainly at least be interesting. There would be twice the Boston/New York rivalry going on, and you'd have the two New York teams playing for higher stakes on a yearly basis than just the Snoopy Trophy. Then Philly would be a good geographic rivalry for all of them. This would be a nice big backyard brawl.
NFC South
Dallas
Houston
New Orleans
Tennessee
The guess here is that the overwhelming majority of Cowboys fans would want to stay in the NFC East. There's too much history and too many rivalries there. However, if they were put into a more geographically friendly division, this is what it might look like. Dallas, Houston, and New Orleans might make for fun backyard rivals, while Tennessee would slide in as the fourth team.
NFC North
Chicago
Green Bay
Indianapolis
Minnesota
Indianapolis is not in the south, as anyone who has been to city in January or February can attest to. Therefore, they get moved to the NFC North to replace Detroit. Other than that, the Black and Blue Division remains the same, and that's a good thing.
(Photo: Photo Illustration by Ted Hyman, 247Sports)
NFC West
Seattle
San Francisco
Oakland
San Diego
They're really still not all that close together, but we're throwing the teams that hug the West Coast in the same spot. Things would change slightly down the line based on whatever happens with the NFL and Los Angeles.
After looking at what the league might look like with a geographic realignment, here are a few deductions.
* The division alignment in the NFL is fine, for the most part. If anything, this exercise teaches us that the NFL divisions are pretty good the way they are. This isn't college football, where we could tinker all day with different combinations of teams and come up with all sorts of fun conferences. The NFL divisions by and large work and for the most part probably shouldn't be touched.
* It would be difficult to make drastic realignment work. An uneven amount of teams between regions, a few teams in odd places geographically compared to the rest of the league and a whole host of rich rivalries make it hard to shift things around in a way that would make it better than it is now.
* Dallas should stay put. The Cowboys being in the NFC East doesn't make much geographic sense. But after rearranging the teams and playing around with different realignment possibilities, there was nothing nearly as compelling for the Cowboys as the current NFC East.
It can always be fun to speculate about things like this, but after going through this exercise, it made us appreciate the way things are. In other words, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Not every current division alignment in the NFL makes geographic sense, but is that a bad thing or a good thing?
(Photo: Photo Illustration by Ted Hyman, 247Sports)
It's always fun to play "what if" when it comes to division alignment and imagine what your team's division would be like if it had different teams. But it can also serve as a reminder that maybe things don't need to be changed.
We tried to take a look at what might happen if NFL divisions were moved around to put the teams closer to each other on the map. After sorting it all out and somewhat randomly assigning teams a conference, the results came out somewhat mixed.
AFC East
Baltimore Ravens
Buffalo Bills
Carolina Panthers
Washington Redskins
There's a couple divisions that don't mesh as well geographically as others due to an uneven amount of teams in certain regions of the country, and this is one of them. Baltimore and Washington certainly make geographic sense, but Buffalo gets caught between our picks for how we shaped the AFC North and NFC East, while Carolina is left hanging out there after shaping the AFC and NFC South. What's left makes for kind of an unappealing division.
AFC North
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Detroit
Pittsburgh
This turned out to be almost the same as the current AFC North with the exception of the switch of Baltimore and Detroit. The Lions would fit in well here, actually, at least in terms of rivalries. Detroit already shares divisions with Cleveland in other sports, plus there would be that Michigan-Ohio thing going on. There may not be two neighboring states in this country that dislike each other as much as those two.
AFC South
Atlanta
Jacksonville
Miami
Tampa Bay
There wouldn't be many frequent flyer miles to be had in this Florida-heavy division. There might be a low number of interesting games too, at least until the Bucs and Jags started to get better.
(Photo: Photo Illustration by Ted Hyman, 247Sports)
AFC West
Arizona
Denver
Kansas City
St. Louis
Kansas City and St. Louis are sitting there in the middle of the country, not quite east or north enough to be in the AFC or NFC North and not quite south enough to be in the AFC or NFC South. They're actually not as far west as Dallas and Houston, but those two teams are needed in the south. So the Chiefs and Rams stay out west.
NFC East
New England Patriots
New York Giants
New York Jets
Philadelphia Eagles
Well, this would certainly at least be interesting. There would be twice the Boston/New York rivalry going on, and you'd have the two New York teams playing for higher stakes on a yearly basis than just the Snoopy Trophy. Then Philly would be a good geographic rivalry for all of them. This would be a nice big backyard brawl.
NFC South
Dallas
Houston
New Orleans
Tennessee
The guess here is that the overwhelming majority of Cowboys fans would want to stay in the NFC East. There's too much history and too many rivalries there. However, if they were put into a more geographically friendly division, this is what it might look like. Dallas, Houston, and New Orleans might make for fun backyard rivals, while Tennessee would slide in as the fourth team.
NFC North
Chicago
Green Bay
Indianapolis
Minnesota
Indianapolis is not in the south, as anyone who has been to city in January or February can attest to. Therefore, they get moved to the NFC North to replace Detroit. Other than that, the Black and Blue Division remains the same, and that's a good thing.
(Photo: Photo Illustration by Ted Hyman, 247Sports)
NFC West
Seattle
San Francisco
Oakland
San Diego
They're really still not all that close together, but we're throwing the teams that hug the West Coast in the same spot. Things would change slightly down the line based on whatever happens with the NFL and Los Angeles.
After looking at what the league might look like with a geographic realignment, here are a few deductions.
* The division alignment in the NFL is fine, for the most part. If anything, this exercise teaches us that the NFL divisions are pretty good the way they are. This isn't college football, where we could tinker all day with different combinations of teams and come up with all sorts of fun conferences. The NFL divisions by and large work and for the most part probably shouldn't be touched.
* It would be difficult to make drastic realignment work. An uneven amount of teams between regions, a few teams in odd places geographically compared to the rest of the league and a whole host of rich rivalries make it hard to shift things around in a way that would make it better than it is now.
* Dallas should stay put. The Cowboys being in the NFC East doesn't make much geographic sense. But after rearranging the teams and playing around with different realignment possibilities, there was nothing nearly as compelling for the Cowboys as the current NFC East.
It can always be fun to speculate about things like this, but after going through this exercise, it made us appreciate the way things are. In other words, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.