Thordaddy said:
There was a graphic on last nights game , of the people on their team 17 were home grown vs. LA's 4, like max sez just a model org. that PRODUCES winners instead of buying them.
I'm going to defend the Dodgers situation ...
Let's say you're a fan of a proud organization owned by a worthless and foolish owner. An owner who's only reason for owning the team was to make money and spend it on himself. Then he sells the team to new owners.
Now, those new owners are aware that the fan base is disillusioned and not coming to the stadium because the team is devoid of talent except for a couple of players. Baseball doesn't have a ceiling on how much can be spent on player contracts. So, when they begin trading away farm talent for established, high dollar players, do you, as a fan, embrace this short cut process? When they go shopping for a top pitcher in FA, knowing that pitching is the best way to win playoff games, are you grateful for those deep pockets? When they continue to add pieces during the season, do you bemoan that young players aren't getting chances? That is, young players that probably aren't going to make a difference for a team that as recently as last year wasn't spending money on player development.
Fortunately, baseball isn't football, and the established pieces in a starting lineup need less time to integrate. If the Dodgers are perceived as a team of hired guns, so be it. But the intention was to get the fans in the seats, and the team back to the World Series.