- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 39,683
Fox played pretty early, and has played well. Yeah, like some noted it is a numbers game, and I include Seau in that game. Our DL is so freaking talented it's ridiculous. I'd hate having to make those decisions, but I will do a 53. I think 2 of our DL cuts will be picked up, whomever they may be. It's a good problem to have, but a hard one, if you have favorites. Seau, to me, looks like a special player someday, but right now, he's in a fight. Fox, if there was anything to gain, did that tonight, but getting a roster spot over Donald, Brockers, Easley, or Thomas, man, that is tough. How many do you carry. The numbers don't gel with the talent.
Fox, made a team tonight.
Fox is definitely flashier, but Thomas is the underappreciated guy that just gets the job done. Tough call.Problem with Fox is that he can't play the Thomas role. Because Thomas doesn't impress me. I wish we could keep both Fox and Seau. But if I had to pick one, I might lean Fox.
Two completely different roles of course. Thomas occupies blockers....often double teamed in the running game. With our small fast LBs that is a good thing. He does a good job and occasionally can get some pressure. Fox looked good and quick and knows how to use his hands but he is a penetrating DT on a team with Donald an Easely. PS maybe. He needs to hold up better vs the run to be more than a rush specialist.Problem with Fox is that he can't play the Thomas role. Because Thomas doesn't impress me. I wish we could keep both Fox and Seau. But if I had to pick one, I might lean Fox.
Fox looked good and quick and knows how to use his hands but he is a penetrating DT on a team with Donald an Easely. PS maybe. He needs to hold up better vs the run to be more than a rush specialist.
No way Fox makes it to the PS. Teams have lists ready for that last cut and because of that game you can rest assured he IS on many of them around the league. If the Rams like him they're gonna have to make room or say goodbye IMO.
Problem with Fox is that he can't play the Thomas role. Because Thomas doesn't impress me. I wish we could keep both Fox and Seau. But if I had to pick one, I might lean Fox.
I wonder if theres research out there somewhere of how many udfa/real young guys that get cut from one team make it to another team's 53 for week 1. I'm under the impression its not that high because giving 1 of those 53 spots to a guy that doesnt know your system and you only have a handful of meaningless preseason snaps of film on them doesnt seem all that likely.
Valid point. But you need to consider what the player brings to the table, and how hard that is to find around the league.
Interior DL who can generate pressure are very hard to find and valued due to the way that can take away a QB's ability to step up in the pocket. That game he had is a big deal IMO, and not all teams are stacked like we are on the DL.
Exactly.You have to go Cam Thomas here no choice but to make that call. This defense simply needs & functions better with a NT like Thomas. Yes Fox sure has more upside & could be something very special but where are you going to play him? He plays the Aaron Donald & Dom Easley post nothing else.
Another thing Thomas gives Gregg some options because he is a legit & experienced 34 NT. Gregg has gone to 3-2-6 defense late last season & it did have some success.
The same thing was said last year about Longacre and LTP but both made it on the PS. In my opinion both those players played better than Seau and Fox. It's not easy to drop one of your final 53 that knows your system for a rookie. If the player was a veteran maybe.No way Fox makes it to the PS. Teams have lists ready for that last cut and because of that game you can rest assured he IS on many of them around the league. If the Rams like him they're gonna have to make room or say goodbye IMO.
This is what happen when your Jobs on the line! When Push comes to Shove!! Pun intended!!:rolllaugh:Also thought Ayers brought it, and was asking my friend "where the F was that intensity in previous weeks?"