Should the Vikings have traded Adrian Peterson?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
CGI_Ram

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
50,458
ROD Credit 2025
10,848
Name
Burger man
I was reading this article on ESPN: (it's not a great article, so I don't advise wasting your time)

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9...stake-minnesota-vikings?ex_cid=espnapi_public

But it got me thinking; why didn't the Vikings trade him?

At 1-6...The Vikings season is over.

Peterson is 28 and will be 29 before next season.

For Peterson's sake; a chance to go to a winner.

For the Vikings; the chance to recoup some value as he approaches 30.

Peterson's best years are behind him. Sure, he's a legend and future HOF... but was it wise to hold onto him at the trade deadline?
 
depends on what he wanted to do and what people were offering
 
I would NOT have wanted to be the guy who made that decision,Maximus said "what you do here will echo through eternity".
If you could get a Hershal Walker/ RGIII / Rickey Williams offer maybe , but it would have to be that sort of thing or you'd need armed escorts to get to work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back