Sando & Williamson - comments about the Rams' D-line

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
EXCERPT:

Sando: Looking at the division overall, I might have put the Rams ahead of the Seahawks. For Seattle, Chris Clemons is hurt, Alan Branch departed, Tony McDaniel was arguably a so-so replacement and Red Bryant is coming off a tough year. Michael Brockers looks like a star in the making for the Rams. Chris Long and Robert Quinn can easily combine for 20-plus sacks. William Hayes is in there too.

Williamson: They have a wide skill set, which I like, too. Irvin and Bryant are totally different players at defensive end. Irvin, Clemons, Avril and Bryant give you versatility. For the Rams, Hayes is an important part of that equation. He had seven sacks last year. Quinn and Long are questionable against the run. Hayes can be a base run defensive end. Plus, he moves inside and can be a quality rusher there.

Sando: I hadn't really thought of Long as a liability against the run.

Williamson: You can run at Long. Part of that is scheme. Sort of like in the Dwight Freeney-Robert Mathis days, they play the run on the way to the quarterback. With the Rams, a lot of it is ahead of them. I'd draft Quinn very high if I were building a team, but he is not as good as Cliff Avril right now. Brockers is going to be a total stud. I didn't love him coming out of LSU, but he far exceeded my expectations. I think he'll be a multiple Pro Bowl player.

<a class="postlink" href="http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/97019/west-dl-ranks-49ers-fourth-wait-a-minute" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... t-a-minute</a>
 

Rabid Ram

Legend
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
7,360
Name
Dustin
Re: Sando & Williamson - comments about the Rams' D-line

The Dude said:
EXCERPT:

Sando: Looking at the division overall, I might have put the Rams ahead of the Seahawks. For Seattle, Chris Clemons is hurt, Alan Branch departed, Tony McDaniel was arguably a so-so replacement and Red Bryant is coming off a tough year. Michael Brockers looks like a star in the making for the Rams. Chris Long and Robert Quinn can easily combine for 20-plus sacks. William Hayes is in there too.

Williamson: They have a wide skill set, which I like, too. Irvin and Bryant are totally different players at defensive end. Irvin, Clemons, Avril and Bryant give you versatility. For the Rams, Hayes is an important part of that equation. He had seven sacks last year. Quinn and Long are questionable against the run. Hayes can be a base run defensive end. Plus, he moves inside and can be a quality rusher there.

Sando: I hadn't really thought of Long as a liability against the run.

Williamson: You can run at Long. Part of that is scheme. Sort of like in the Dwight Freeney-Robert Mathis days, they play the run on the way to the quarterback. With the Rams, a lot of it is ahead of them. I'd draft Quinn very high if I were building a team, but he is not as good as Cliff Avril right now. Brockers is going to be a total stud. I didn't love him coming out of LSU, but he far exceeded my expectations. I think he'll be a multiple Pro Bowl player.

<a class="postlink" href="http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/97019/west-dl-ranks-49ers-fourth-wait-a-minute" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... t-a-minute</a>


Good read thanx for the share dude.

Fisher when backed by the owner and good GM has had stellar defensive units used to challenge the ravens for #1 d unit every year
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,592
Brockers impressed last year while playing on a bum ankle. Imagine what he will be like playing healthy with even more refined techniques. :cheese:
 

iBruce

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
1,152
Name
Cory
I've never understood the 'Long is a liability vs the run' mentality.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
iBruce said:
I've never understood the 'Long is a liability vs the run' mentality.
I don't think it's necessarily a knock on his *ability* to stop the run. From what I'm reading, it's more a scheme issue. Teams take advantage of his tendency to go hard after the QB and (possibly) are able to get in front of that rush. Same thing happens to Quinn too. They're both tenacious rushers who can get washed out of running plays. However, if you run right at them, and they're playing the run, then I haven't seen many issues with their ability to execute.
 

iBruce

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
1,152
Name
Cory
The Dude said:
iBruce said:
I've never understood the 'Long is a liability vs the run' mentality.
I don't think it's necessarily a knock on his *ability* to stop the run. From what I'm reading, it's more a scheme issue. Teams take advantage of his tendency to go hard after the QB and (possibly) are able to get in front of that rush. Same thing happens to Quinn too. They're both tenacious rushers who can get washed out of running plays. However, if you run right at them, and they're playing the run, then I haven't seen many issues with their ability to execute.

That makes sense I guess. Thanks for clearing that up. I'm all for our defensive scheme. Long and Quinn need to keep making big plays.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,940
The Dude said:
EXCERPT:

Sando: Looking at the division overall, I might have put the Rams ahead of the Seahawks. For Seattle, Chris Clemons is hurt, Alan Branch departed, Tony McDaniel was arguably a so-so replacement and Red Bryant is coming off a tough year. Michael Brockers looks like a star in the making for the Rams. Chris Long and Robert Quinn can easily combine for 20-plus sacks. William Hayes is in there too.

Williamson: They have a wide skill set, which I like, too. Irvin and Bryant are totally different players at defensive end. Irvin, Clemons, Avril and Bryant give you versatility. For the Rams, Hayes is an important part of that equation. He had seven sacks last year. Quinn and Long are questionable against the run. Hayes can be a base run defensive end. Plus, he moves inside and can be a quality rusher there.

Sando: I hadn't really thought of Long as a liability against the run.

Williamson: You can run at Long. Part of that is scheme. Sort of like in the Dwight Freeney-Robert Mathis days, they play the run on the way to the quarterback. With the Rams, a lot of it is ahead of them. I'd draft Quinn very high if I were building a team, but he is not as good as Cliff Avril right now. Brockers is going to be a total stud. I didn't love him coming out of LSU, but he far exceeded my expectations. I think he'll be a multiple Pro Bowl player.

<a class="postlink" href="http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/97019/west-dl-ranks-49ers-fourth-wait-a-minute" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... t-a-minute</a>

Let me get this straight, Williamson picks Seattle's DL over ours despite ours being a superior pass rushing unit because he doesn't think Quinn or Long are particularly good run stoppers...when Seattle has Avril, Clemons and Bruce Irvin at DE? Come on.

Bryant and Bennett are excellent run stoppers at LDE but they aren't comparable to Chris Long in terms of pass rushing ability.

As for Cliff Avril, he produced less than Quinn did last year and Quinn is expected to only improve in the future. Plus Avril is a terrible run defender.

Sorry Williams but your logic stinks here.
 

Yamahopper

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,838
I think I'll take the Rams by a shade over the Seahawks. More athleticism and physicality with the Rams.

They run at Quinn and Long in part because they don't want them pursuing. Both Long and Quinn are good at stopping the play from the backside.
Now with Brockers and Langford up the middle it gets rough in there, so where else are they going to go. Unlike it was in 11 where they could knock over the Rams pylon DT's and run it up the gut.

But, neither Long and Quinn are much bigger than some 3-4 OLB so they can get engulfed by much bigger tackles and get pushed out of their gaps. Just physics.
But still worth the pass rush you get from them.
 

F. Mulder

Starter
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
773
People get too worked up about team or unit or player rankings. It's just media spin. Make it happen on the field and you'll see a different ranking.
 

fastcat

Pro Bowler
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
1,197
Re: Sando & Williamson - comments about the Rams' D-line

I dont see how he views Long as a liability against the run. He isnt stellar on run support but he is a little more than serviceable. But Quinn on the other hand is a big liability, either he over runs the play or gets pushed out of the play. Thats why most of the longer runs came from his side.