Ram_of_Old
Guest
I hate to say that, but it is beginning to look that way. I guess I will find a double feature movie on that day.
Ram_of_Old said:I hate to say that, but it is beginning to look that way. I guess I will find a double feature movie on that day.
interference said:Ugh!
rams24/7 said:The way ATL played today gives me little confidence that they can beat SF. You need to play a near perfect game against SF with few to no turnovers. I also think the Falcons will have MORE trouble stopping SF's offense than they did with the Hawks.
The two areas where ATL struggled the most defending Seattle was w/the tight end (Miller) and keeping tabs on Wilson in the pocket. Well I think the 49ers are better in both areas: David/Walker > Miller and Kaep legs > Wilson's legs.
Sad to say the most disciplined team vs Kaep & Wilson this year is not in the playoffs (our Rams)!
I too think its NE & SF in the big one.
I'd root for the Pats, because there is no team I hate more than SF :amped: (although I do hate NE).
Plus, I think with 2 weeks prep, Bellicheat can devise a pretty good game plan to limit Kaep. Hell he may even film a few SF practices
Rams4life said:rams24/7 said:The way ATL played today gives me little confidence that they can beat SF. You need to play a near perfect game against SF with few to no turnovers. I also think the Falcons will have MORE trouble stopping SF's offense than they did with the Hawks.
The two areas where ATL struggled the most defending Seattle was w/the tight end (Miller) and keeping tabs on Wilson in the pocket. Well I think the 49ers are better in both areas: David/Walker > Miller and Kaep legs > Wilson's legs.
Sad to say the most disciplined team vs Kaep & Wilson this year is not in the playoffs (our Rams)!
I too think its NE & SF in the big one.
I'd root for the Pats, because there is no team I hate more than SF :amped: (although I do hate NE).
Plus, I think with 2 weeks prep, Bellicheat can devise a pretty good game plan to limit Kaep. Hell he may even film a few SF practices
Are we talking about the same 49er team that got smacked by the chickens? Then alanta beat that same chicken team and now they have no chance against SF?
I don't see it that way. I think both road teams win, then we can all have a watchable super bowl.
Sent from my SCH-I100 using Tapatalk 2
Right. Glad I wasn't the only one confused by that, even after reading it like 3-times.rams24/7 said:Rams4life said:rams24/7 said:The way ATL played today gives me little confidence that they can beat SF. You need to play a near perfect game against SF with few to no turnovers. I also think the Falcons will have MORE trouble stopping SF's offense than they did with the Hawks.
The two areas where ATL struggled the most defending Seattle was w/the tight end (Miller) and keeping tabs on Wilson in the pocket. Well I think the 49ers are better in both areas: David/Walker > Miller and Kaep legs > Wilson's legs.
Sad to say the most disciplined team vs Kaep & Wilson this year is not in the playoffs (our Rams)!
I too think its NE & SF in the big one.
I'd root for the Pats, because there is no team I hate more than SF :amped: (although I do hate NE).
Plus, I think with 2 weeks prep, Bellicheat can devise a pretty good game plan to limit Kaep. Hell he may even film a few SF practices
Are we talking about the same 49er team that got smacked by the chickens? Then alanta beat that same chicken team and now they have no chance against SF?
I don't see it that way. I think both road teams win, then we can all have a watchable super bowl.
Sent from my SCH-I100 using Tapatalk 2
But Atlanta is the home team, not the road team...
Ram Quixote said:Let me again remind anyone who thinks rooting for the SF in the SB is a viable option, the only good from SF being in the SB is if they lose and that perfect 5-0 gets tainted with a loss. Bad enough the Rams must win 4 SBs just to match them for wins.
rams24/7 said:Rams4life said:rams24/7 said:The way ATL played today gives me little confidence that they can beat SF. You need to play a near perfect game against SF with few to no turnovers. I also think the Falcons will have MORE trouble stopping SF's offense than they did with the Hawks.
The two areas where ATL struggled the most defending Seattle was w/the tight end (Miller) and keeping tabs on Wilson in the pocket. Well I think the 49ers are better in both areas: David/Walker > Miller and Kaep legs > Wilson's legs.
Sad to say the most disciplined team vs Kaep & Wilson this year is not in the playoffs (our Rams)!
I too think its NE & SF in the big one.
I'd root for the Pats, because there is no team I hate more than SF :amped: (although I do hate NE).
Plus, I think with 2 weeks prep, Bellicheat can devise a pretty good game plan to limit Kaep. Hell he may even film a few SF practices
Are we talking about the same 49er team that got smacked by the chickens? Then alanta beat that same chicken team and now they have no chance against SF?
I don't see it that way. I think both road teams win, then we can all have a watchable super bowl.
Sent from my SCH-I100 using Tapatalk 2
But Atlanta is the home team, not the road team...
Selassie I said:I have a bad feeling about this. What a nightmare the SB will be with these two freaking teams. I really don't think I could watch this shyte.
If it comes to pass... I'm going fishing instead. Got room if any of you want to come with.