Salary cap spending last few years

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,231
Name
Burger man
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/l...-shows-patriots-are-money-smart-eagles-arent/

Is your favorite NFL team being smart with its money?

Thanks to the NFL Players Association, we can now kind of answer that question. For the past four years, the NFLPA has been tracking how much each team has been using in cash.

Basically, when the new CBA was implemented in 2011, one of the new agreements called for each NFL team to spend at least 89 percent of its salary cap in cash during specific four-year periods.

With the first four-year period (2013 to 2016) set to end in March 2017, the NFLPA released new numbers on Monday that show how each team has done in regard to meeting the 89 percent minimum threshold.

For the four-year period, each team had a total of $554,550,000 in salary cap space. Of that total, the CBA required that each had to spend roughly $493.5 million in cash on player salaries.
With just three months to go, the Raiders are the only team in the NFL that hasn't met the minimum spending threshold. At $491.4 million, the Raiders have roughly 90 days to spend $2.1 million and meet the minimum requirement. The Raiders could do that simply by extending someone's contract.

As CBS Sports NFL Insider Jason La Canfora noted in November, if the Raiders don't meet the spending threshold, they'd have to cut a check to the NFLPA for the amount that they fall short.

The NFLPA's numbers show that the 32 teams combined to spend a total of $17.44 billion in cash on player salary between 2013 and 2016. If you want to know if you're team has been spending smartly, just check out the rankings below.

For instance, the Eagles spent more than $600 million between 2013 and 2016, but they only have one playoff berth to show for that. That's pretty rough, especially when you consider that they're the only team that's spent over $600 million. The three teams right below the Eagles have all been to the playoffs in each of the past three years.

On the other hand, the Panthers only spent $495.1 million during that span and have three playoff appearances and a Super Bowl berth to show for it. Besides the Raiders, the Panthers are the only team that spent under $500 million.

The Patriots have also been thrifty, ranking 30th in money spent.

Here's how much each team spent in cash on player salaries between 2013 and 2016.

  1. Eagles: $613.9 million
  2. Broncos: $587.7 million
  3. Seahawks: $584.3 million
  4. Packers: $583.1 million
  5. Dolphins: $578 million
  6. Chiefs: $575.5 million
  7. Bills: $573.6 million
  8. Bears: $586.3 million
  9. Bengals: $567.3 million
  10. Ravens: $562.4 million
  11. Chargers: $562.2 million
  12. Colts: $556.3 million
  13. Falcons: $550.6 million
  14. Giants: $543.8 million
  15. Cardinals: $543.3 million
  16. Rams: $542 million
  17. Saints: $539.8 million
  18. Buccaneers: $539.7 million
  19. Vikings: $539.2 million
  20. Jets: $533.2 million
  21. Redskins: $532.5 million
  22. Pittsburgh Steelers : $530.7 million
  23. Detroit Lions : $530.2 million
  24. Tennessee Titans : $524.5 million
  25. Dallas Cowboys : $523 million
  26. Houston Texans : $517.2 million
  27. Jacksonville Jaguars : $516.9 million
  28. Cleveland Browns : $516.2 million
  29. 49ers: $514.5 million
  30. Patriots: $500.1 million
  31. Panthers: $495.1 million
  32. MINIMUM THRESHOLD: $493.5 million
  33. Raiders: $491.4 million
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
18,000
So in other words, money spent = no correlation to winning.
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,453
Amazing what they have done in Oakland. When what's his nuts came over from Green Bay to GM their roster was old and bad and they had no cap room.
Look at them now. Heck of a job in short time.
 

wmc540

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
1,029
Amazing what they have done in Oakland. When what's his nuts came over from Green Bay to GM their roster was old and bad and they had no cap room.
Look at them now. Heck of a job in short time.

Patriots are even more amazing.
 

Zodi

Hall of Fame
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
3,638
Amazing what they have done in Oakland. When what's his nuts came over from Green Bay to GM their roster was old and bad and they had no cap room.
Look at them now. Heck of a job in short time.

What's even more amazing is what they're doing with a coach in Del Rio, who looks like a lost fan who made it into the sideline.
 

Hey Man

Starter
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
767
Name
Hey Man
I could be wrong but it's finding talented players right out of the draft that can start and contribute right away and be successful . That is cheap labor for rookie contracts as long as your winning. Keep the player's that are having success for 1 more contract extension if it makes sense . Get rid of players that are going to cost to much. To me it's all about successful drafting which keeps the roster costs down and not over spending in free agency . The Eagles can thank Chip Kelly for his free agent frenzy for the 2015 season .
 

MTRamsFan

Montana is God's Country
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
4,048
Name
Greg
Going into 2017: Hmm, what to... do what to do??

Total Cap Liabilities: $124,833,936
Offense: $59,273,023
Defense: $48,050,553
Special: $3,248,773

Team Salary Cap: $166,000,000
Team Cap Space: $41,166,064

Top 25 Players and their Contracts:
upload_2016-12-7_14-53-17.png