Saints have a $21.3 million cap charge looming for Drew Brees

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
50,195
Name
Burger man
Saints have a $21.3 million cap charge looming for Drew Brees

The Saints will see the $13.5 million in dead money that the Patriots will carry for Tom Brady in 2020 and raise it by $7.8 million.

Tom Curran’s story of the dead money attached to Tom Brady’s soon-to-be-voiding contract conjured memories of the cap mess to be created by Drew Brees in New Orleans. As explained last March, a restructuring that dropped his cap number for 2019 from $33.5 million to $22.7 million pushed the total for 2020 to be carried in Brees’ name to $21.3 million, whether he’s on the team or not.

And if he’s on the team, a new contract will have to both pay Brees and account for the dead money.

The Saints have been down this road before. Two years ago, Brees had $18 million in dead money that needed to be engineered via his new deal. Eventually, Brees signed a two-year, $50 million deal to stay with the Saints.

Regardless of what happens next, the Saints at some point will have to bite the Brees bullet when he makes his exit, taking the cap charge for millions previously paid to Brees. Fortunately for the Saints, the cap keeps going up and up and up, and it could skyrocket if/when the league and the NFL Players Association reach a new labor deal, followed by a new round of TV contracts.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
50,195
Name
Burger man
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
Dead money complicates Tom Brady’s negotiations with Patriots

If quarterback Tom Brady decides to stay with the Patriots and the Patriots decide to continue to employ a quarterback who will turn 43 in August, the first challenge comes from crafting a contract in time to best manage a $13.5 million chunk of dead money that will drop into 2020, if Brady doesn’t re-sign before March 17.

Tom Curran of NBC Sports Boston flags the problem and delves into the broader question of whether the Patriots would be willing to pay something closer to market value for Brady at a time when he can hit the open market, leaving for a new team and leaving behind an eight-figure cloud of crop dust for the team’s salary cap.

Creative cap accounting, with signing bonuses and other devices, can help the Patriots deal with the $13.5 million, but at some point every dollar spent on Brady must hit the cap. And if he wants to be paid much more than he has been paid in past years, things could get dicey for a team with plenty of holes to fill on the roster, especially on offense.

Brady never has been motivated by making the most money possible, but what has he gotten in recent years for taking less? The money hasn’t been spent to make the team better (at least not effectively), as evidenced by the fact that the team isn’t better — especially on offense. So if there’s another team that offers a nice bump over what Brady has been making, along with maybe a greater role in the crafting and construction offense like Peyton Manning in Denver eight years ago, Brady may decide to move on.

Presumably, wherever Brady goes, he’ll want to win. His social-media post from Wednesday hints at a journey-not-the-destination vibe, however, that could make him willing to not try to find a spot where the deck is stacked in his favor but instead to be driven by other factors, professional and/or personal.

Whatever the Patriots and Brady do, it makes sense to brings thing to a head before $13.5 million drops automatically onto the 2020 cap. If he’s going to stay, it will be easier to manage the cap burden if that $13.5 million can be crafted into a revised deal instead of simply being an elephant in the room that adds to whatever the Patriots pay Brady for 2020 and beyond.
 

thirteen28

I like pizza.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
8,973
Name
Erik
1578668210570.png
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
Hopefully this article will enlighten some of our own fans who wish to restructure the contracts of Goff and others as to how much of a future CAP problem we can induce by using similar methods of spending now and pushing debt back.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
44,049
And right now the Saints sit with a bit over $4 million in cap space and no QB's on the roster. Yet we mortgaged the future.
 

SteveBrown

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
1,513
Name
Steve
Saints have a $21.3 million cap charge looming for Drew Brees

The Saints will see the $13.5 million in dead money that the Patriots will carry for Tom Brady in 2020 and raise it by $7.8 million.

Tom Curran’s story of the dead money attached to Tom Brady’s soon-to-be-voiding contract conjured memories of the cap mess to be created by Drew Brees in New Orleans. As explained last March, a restructuring that dropped his cap number for 2019 from $33.5 million to $22.7 million pushed the total for 2020 to be carried in Brees’ name to $21.3 million, whether he’s on the team or not.

And if he’s on the team, a new contract will have to both pay Brees and account for the dead money.

The Saints have been down this road before. Two years ago, Brees had $18 million in dead money that needed to be engineered via his new deal. Eventually, Brees signed a two-year, $50 million deal to stay with the Saints.

Regardless of what happens next, the Saints at some point will have to bite the Brees bullet when he makes his exit, taking the cap charge for millions previously paid to Brees. Fortunately for the Saints, the cap keeps going up and up and up, and it could skyrocket if/when the league and the NFL Players Association reach a new labor deal, followed by a new round of TV contracts.
Brees lost 2 games at home in the playoffs. I go with Bridgewater, I think he gives them the better chance to win. Brees is still good, but sign an ALL Pro DB with the Brees money, and Saints are a top 3 NFC team again next year.
 

SteveBrown

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
1,513
Name
Steve
Brees lost 2 games at home in the playoffs. I go with Bridgewater, I think he gives them the better chance to win. Brees is still good, but sign an ALL Pro DB with the Brees money, and Saints are a top 3 NFC team again next year.
OOPS, i DIDNT read it...Brees is 21 mill cap hit, even if he is on the team....well then, Bridgewater will win more than Drew, so I guess Payton will find out more ways to lose :)
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
6,806
Hopefully this article will enlighten some of our own fans who wish to restructure the contracts of Goff and others as to how much of a future CAP problem we can induce by using similar methods of spending now and pushing debt back.
I thought Goff's would only amount to 5 million per year against the cap
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
18,295
Brees lost 2 games at home in the playoffs. I go with Bridgewater, I think he gives them the better chance to win. Brees is still good, but sign an ALL Pro DB with the Brees money, and Saints are a top 3 NFC team again next year.
Brees is a choke.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
43,194
He's about done. That deep pass he hit in their last game barely got to the receiver. Payton is going to have to make a call re: his QB position soon IMO.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
I thought Goff's would only amount to 5 million per year against the cap

I honestly don't know how much restructuring management has in mind in relations to Goff's CAP, if any at all, ... but his 2019 CAP hit of $10,629,577 jumps to $36,042,683 in 2020, leaving a good deal of room for manipulation. My concern is at the back end of his contract where money taken now would be applied later. The final year of Goff's contract in 2024 shows a current CAP hit of $26,000,000. which is quite manageable, but if the Rams start adding debt as the years pass, just how high might that figure one day reach. If we are contemplating a restructure for 2020 now, what happens next year when we are trying to extend Ramsey, Kupp, JJ3 & Everett, ... or the year after and the one after that again ? If Goff gets injured, those will be some hefty CAP consequences.
jmo.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,938
This will be interesting to follow. Will it eventually catch up to them? I think it has to with limiting roster moves in the future. Can't blame them as even future HOF Quarterbacks need a solid team behind them.
 
Last edited:

Flint

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,675
I’ve heard Bridgewater’s name thrown around and people talk about his record when Brees was hurt but I thought he was just ok when he was healthy, now after blowing out his knee don’t know if he’s the an answer