Round 1: shock release, shock survival

[iced]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

*pushes middle mouse button and moves mouse to bottom of the sceen*

That's winning

 

[CGI_Ram]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

*pushes middle mouse button and moves mouse to bottom of the sceen*

That's winning

:lmao:

Damn. Sometimes, you guys just kill me.

 

[-X-]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

*pushes middle mouse button and moves mouse to bottom of the sceen*

That's winning

Don't make me install an auto-refresh script on this site that refreshes the page every .01 seconds.

cuz I'll do it.

 

[Lesson]

Not really shocked with anyone on the roster still aside from Hooey.

At least there hasn't been a Dominique Curry/Donnie Avery/Danario Alexander dilemma.

 

[jrry32]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

That's a good way to get your opinion out there...but while you're doing that...I'll be busy winning the debate. :ww:

 

[-X-]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

That's a good way to get your opinion out there...but while you're doing that...I'll be busy winning the debate. :ww:

You know, in all honesty, I'd love to have that debate with you. But my point wouldn't be that Spags is a great head coach. It would be that NO head coach could have succeeded given the circumstances.

If you want to debate that ... bring your lunch. :ww:

.

sent via Tapatalk.

 

[jrry32]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

That's a good way to get your opinion out there...but while you're doing that...I'll be busy winning the debate. :ww:

You know, in all honesty, I'd love to have that debate with you. But my point wouldn't be that Spags is a great head coach. It would be that NO head coach could have succeeded given the circumstances.

If you want to debate that ... bring your lunch. :ww:

.

sent via Tapatalk.

And you'd be making a sound argument. However, I could still make the point that while Spags's conditions weren't fair(2009 Rams are the least talented team I've ever seen), that he didn't do enough to make them better.

 

[-X-]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

That's a good way to get your opinion out there...but while you're doing that...I'll be busy winning the debate. :ww:

You know, in all honesty, I'd love to have that debate with you. But my point wouldn't be that Spags is a great head coach. It would be that NO head coach could have succeeded given the circumstances.

If you want to debate that ... bring your lunch. :ww:

.

sent via Tapatalk.

And you'd be making a sound argument. However, I could still make the point that while Spags's conditions weren't fair(2009 Rams are the least talented team I've ever seen), that he didn't do enough to make them better.

And I have very valid and soundly researched reasons for that ...

BTW, are we having a hypothetical debate in advance of an actual one? lol.

 

[Rabid Ram]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

*pushes middle mouse button and moves mouse to bottom of the sceen*

That's winning

Clicks view new post button winning all day

 

[jrry32]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

That's a good way to get your opinion out there...but while you're doing that...I'll be busy winning the debate. :ww:

You know, in all honesty, I'd love to have that debate with you. But my point wouldn't be that Spags is a great head coach. It would be that NO head coach could have succeeded given the circumstances.

If you want to debate that ... bring your lunch. :ww:

.

sent via Tapatalk.

And you'd be making a sound argument. However, I could still make the point that while Spags's conditions weren't fair(2009 Rams are the least talented team I've ever seen), that he didn't do enough to make them better.

And I have very valid and soundly researched reasons for that ...

BTW, are we having a hypothetical debate in advance of an actual one? lol.

When you plan to have it, let me know. :ww:

 

[-X-]

Just fair warning. If the Spags debate reignites, I'm going to post my 100,000 word thesis statement on what happened to the Rams after 2008 - including every single salary cap consideration and forced roster move in 2009; the socioeconomic impact of a rookie pay scale allowed to grow out of control; every single free agent that was relegated to restricted (as opposed to unrestricted) during the offseason because of the CBA negotiation; every single injury that took place and how long they were (coupled with who the replacement was); and the cause-n-effect of installing a McDaniels system with no off-season and trying to master it with the most injury plagued offense in anyone's recent memory (and that includes dudes who watched this team since the 50's).

And THAT -- was just the forward. :hehe:

Oh. And I'll pin it 40 times to the main page so you have to go to page 2 to see new posts.

BOOM. #WINNING.

That's a good way to get your opinion out there...but while you're doing that...I'll be busy winning the debate. :ww:

You know, in all honesty, I'd love to have that debate with you. But my point wouldn't be that Spags is a great head coach. It would be that NO head coach could have succeeded given the circumstances.

If you want to debate that ... bring your lunch. :ww:

.

sent via Tapatalk.

And you'd be making a sound argument. However, I could still make the point that while Spags's conditions weren't fair(2009 Rams are the least talented team I've ever seen), that he didn't do enough to make them better.

And I have very valid and soundly researched reasons for that ...

BTW, are we having a hypothetical debate in advance of an actual one? lol.

When you plan to have it, let me know. :ww:

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

 

[jrry32]

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

As T-Pain said, all I do is win.

 

[-X-]

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

As T-Pain said, all I do is win.

Yeah, I think those were Commodus' last words too. lol.

I'm kinda tired today because it was STUPID hot outside and I put in about 12 hours. So I'll grant you a stay of execution for now, but tomorrow I'm gonna draw you more parallels than a Geometry class chalkboard.

 

[CGI_Ram]

opcorn:

 

[jrry32]

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

As T-Pain said, all I do is win.

Yeah, I think those were Commodus' last words too. lol.

I'm kinda tired today because it was STUPID hot outside and I put in about 12 hours. So I'll grant you a stay of execution for now, but tomorrow I'm gonna draw you more parallels than a Geometry class chalkboard.

Sadly, I also believe you'll take more obtuse angles than that Geometry class chalkboard. :ww:

 

[-X-]

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

As T-Pain said, all I do is win.

Yeah, I think those were Commodus' last words too. lol.

I'm kinda tired today because it was STUPID hot outside and I put in about 12 hours. So I'll grant you a stay of execution for now, but tomorrow I'm gonna draw you more parallels than a Geometry class chalkboard.

Sadly, I also believe you'll take more obtuse angles than that Geometry class chalkboard. :ww:

I'll have to in order to get around your circular logic. :razzed:

 

[jrry32]

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

As T-Pain said, all I do is win.

Yeah, I think those were Commodus' last words too. lol.

I'm kinda tired today because it was STUPID hot outside and I put in about 12 hours. So I'll grant you a stay of execution for now, but tomorrow I'm gonna draw you more parallels than a Geometry class chalkboard.

Sadly, I also believe you'll take more obtuse angles than that Geometry class chalkboard. :ww:

I'll have to in order to get around your circular logic. :razzed:

You mistake my logic for that hole you're trying to stick the square peg into.

 

[-X-]

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

As T-Pain said, all I do is win.

Yeah, I think those were Commodus' last words too. lol.

I'm kinda tired today because it was STUPID hot outside and I put in about 12 hours. So I'll grant you a stay of execution for now, but tomorrow I'm gonna draw you more parallels than a Geometry class chalkboard.

Sadly, I also believe you'll take more obtuse angles than that Geometry class chalkboard. :ww:

I'll have to in order to get around your circular logic. :razzed:

You mistake my logic for that hole you're trying to stick the square peg into.

Piece of cake. All I gotta do is whittle away at your arguments.

Which should be easy, because you're packing soft wood.
DOUBLE WHAMMY!

 

[jrry32]

Ju got it mang.

I'll be out in the field working all day today, but when I get back from the gym tonight I'll go ahead and throw a little something together for you . Or you can concede right now ... your choice.

.

sent via Tapatalk.

As T-Pain said, all I do is win.

Yeah, I think those were Commodus' last words too. lol.

I'm kinda tired today because it was STUPID hot outside and I put in about 12 hours. So I'll grant you a stay of execution for now, but tomorrow I'm gonna draw you more parallels than a Geometry class chalkboard.

Sadly, I also believe you'll take more obtuse angles than that Geometry class chalkboard. :ww:

I'll have to in order to get around your circular logic. :razzed:

You mistake my logic for that hole you're trying to stick the square peg into.

Piece of cake. All I gotta do is whittle away at your arguments.

Which should be easy, because you're packing soft wood.
DOUBLE WHAMMY!

Don't worry...it becomes hard quite quickly...especially when Moklerman is posting in the thread. :ww:

As for my arguments, don't worry about them. They're as effective as a stutter step on Craig Dahl in the open-field. :cheese: