- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 18,666
- Name
- Dave
My wife and I are considering getting a Reverse Mortgage Loan! Does anyone out there have one!? Any info Good or Bad would be appreciated!
LOL! It was Sellek's commercial that got us thinking about it!My mother in law was just talking about it yesterday. The thought upsets her.
She is ticked off at Tom Sellek for doing a commercial for it lol.
I don't have any info to help. Just thought it was funny.
Well, not sure about your personal situation but they can be quite good for the right fit.My wife and I are considering getting a Reverse Mortgage Loan! Does anyone out there have one!? Any info Good or Bad would be appreciated!
My wife and I are considering getting a Reverse Mortgage Loan! Does anyone out there have one!? Any info Good or Bad would be appreciated!
This is what my wife and I are looking to do! Thanks for all the input!So we put her in the reverse, she took out additional to pay off her bills and remaining mortgage balance and is living quite comfortably on her pension/social security.
Well, not sure about your personal situation but they can be quite good for the right fit.
I put my Aunt, (my god mother in fact) in one. She was living on fixed income, with some small debts and barely having enough to cover her monthly payments. Yet here she was sitting on a home that had a ton of equity that she couldn't really use, it was only on paper. So we put her in the reverse, she took out additional to pay off her bills and remaining mortgage balance and is living quite comfortably on her pension/social security.
The downsize? Well, the reverse mortgage negatively amortizes so that equity that she intends to leave to my cousins, is dissipating each month as her mortgage balance is growing. On the bright side, in her neighborhood home values have increased by some 8-10% so it has stayed almost static.
Yes, there are fees associated with it, and it certainly is not a short term fix.
So yeah, IMO, it can be a fantastic loan for the right person.
The way I understand it, IF she has a spouse at home, the Home would be safe, if not the loan would be in default. I think so anyway, IDK for sure!!This dummy has a question. What if your aunt has to go to a nursing home? For most homeowners entering a nursing home their house is the asset that either initially pays for the care until medicaid kicks in or they simply pay out of pocket. With a reverse mortgage is the house no longer an asset for paying for a nursing home?
Its still an asset, she would have to sell it and use up the cash before medicare/medicaid kicks in.This dummy has a question. What if your aunt has to go to a nursing home? For most homeowners entering a nursing home their house is the asset that either initially pays for the care until medicaid kicks in or they simply pay out of pocket. With a reverse mortgage is the house no longer an asset for paying for a nursing home?
The way I understand it, IF she has a spouse at home, the Home would be safe, if not the loan would be in default. I think so anyway, IDK for sure!!
This dummy has a question. What if your aunt has to go to a nursing home? For most homeowners entering a nursing home their house is the asset that either initially pays for the care until medicaid kicks in or they simply pay out of pocket. With a reverse mortgage is the house no longer an asset for paying for a nursing home?
It would also be extremely wise to start getting power of attorney and taking the elderly persons name off as many accounts as possible. When my mother in law needed to go into assisted living , she had no assets but her SS check left.They usually go back 5-7 years to check for "unusual actvity"
The beneficiaries still get the house, just may not have as much equityI guess it would depend on the need for cash and how much you care about leaving your house to your beneficiaries.
The beneficiaries still get the house, just may not have as much equity
Exactly.It's not really the same thing. They get the encumbered house. A lot of people don't want to leave a mortgage to their kids.
Owning a home free and clear is quite rare, and most of the reverse mortgages are paying off the current mortgage. And all homes are encumbered with property taxes.It's not really the same thing. They get the encumbered house. A lot of people don't want to leave a mortgage to their kids.
More great info Thanks a lot Dieterbrock!!! (When I read my comment, it almost sounds poetic!)Owning a home free and clear is quite rare, and most of the reverse mortgages are paying off the current mortgage. And all homes are encumbered with property taxes.
For the beneficiaries, it is actually a benefit to acquire a home that has a reverse mortgage on it as opposed to a typical mortgage or home equity loan. The reverse loan typically offers 6-12 months for the property to be disbursed where on a standard mortgage the loan needs to be kept up to date. Either way the mortgage is treated the same when the propert is sold.
Lastly, as it pertains to beneficiaries, it is merely an avenue to liquidate an asset to provide quality of life. Drawing income from the equity is an option as opposed to liquidating stock accounts or retirement accounts that would be left behind. Negatively amortizing the home at around 4% may be better for the beneficiaries instead of liquidating a stock account that may be earning 8-10%