RB Boost w Michel?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

GoodBadUgly

Gridiron Sage
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
1,961
Name
Phil
Just heard Michel was cut by Fins.

If he doesn’t land somewhere as starter, I would love to have him here again to boost RB room.
 

XXXIVwin

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Messages
4,955
Wow. Sony had 208 carries for 845 yards for us last year, a 4.1 average. For many games he not only felt like our best runner-- it seemed like we found our identity with him.

Just strange to me that Michel seems to have so little value, given how often he carried the Rams on his back in 2021.

Jake Funk or Sony Michel? No contest. Yeah Funk is good on ST, but purely as a RB.....?
 

RamUK

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Messages
1,003
Just heard Michel was cut by Fins.

If he doesn’t land somewhere as starter, I would love to have him here again to boost RB room.
Totally agree with you and @XXXIVwin , if the price is right he immediately improves our backfield.
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
8,805
Name
Jim
Have to disagree here, and I really like Sony Michel; and greatly appreciate what he did for the Rams.

His blitz pick-up on Al-Shaair, on the third-down-pass to Kupp to set-up the go-ahead FG was huge.

Michel would be the 4th-RB on this roster and because he does not play STs, he would not even dress.

Terrific insurance in case of injury but that's not the way McVay builds a roster He sets the roster to help him win games. If the Rams carry four RBs, it will be Funk; and it will be because of his STs' contribution.
 
Last edited:

OntarioRam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
3,622
Wow. Sony had 208 carries for 845 yards for us last year, a 4.1 average. For many games he not only felt like our best runner-- it seemed like we found our identity with him.

Just strange to me that Michel seems to have so little value, given how often he carried the Rams on his back in 2021.

Jake Funk or Sony Michel? No contest. Yeah Funk is good on ST, but purely as a RB.....?
Agreed. If the financials work, I'd bring Michel back and cut Funk. Funk has not shown much to my eye. We can find someone else to take Funk's spot on special teams. I would not say Funk's special teams contributions have been anything spectuacular.

Sony provides tough running and the ability to plough through opposing defenders for short yardage. At least last year, Akers and Hendo seemed incapable of doing that. I am optimistic that Akers will be better this year with more time to heal from his achilles injury. But still. Sony carried our offense last year at times. He was highly effective. He is a vet that knows how to win. His pass protection and blitz diagnosis are both very good (remember the .gif of him flying through the air to protect Stafford, I think against Tampa Bay?). He would be a definite asset to the team.

Of course, who knows if Michel even wants to come back. The Rams might well not be able to pay what he is seeking. Moreover, once Akers returned to the lineup, Sony was immediately getting almost 0 snaps, which was pretty perplexing, given how well Michel played for the team, and the fact that Akers was coming off a serious injury and at times having trouble getting going. I am not saying that Cam should not have returned to his RB1 role. But the fact that Michel was immediately all but benched, despite how well he played, and being the only RB to stay healthy for the season, when Cam and Hendo weren't providing anything special, might well have left him feeling disrespected.
 

Classic Rams

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,351
Mixed on this one. I'd welcome him back, but I realize his pass catching game is his weakness and McVay likes backs that are also a receiving threat. That's not to say he couldn't excel on screens, but that still would be less than a well-rounded contribution. The vet price may also be a negative. The faith McVay has in rookie KR keeps Michel off the roster. If KR makes 1 or 2 plays vs Bills when he's in, McVay could have instant verification for not bringing Sony back.
 

LARams_1963

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 29, 2016
Messages
3,014
Name
greg
If the price is right it's a no brainer, as long as his skills haven't diminished in the last 8 months. We've seen Cam and Daryll's injury history so I think we need a solid 3rd RB.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,169
If the price is right it's a no brainer, as long as his skills haven't diminished in the last 8 months. We've seen Cam and Daryll's injury history so I think we need a solid 3rd RB.

Some brains work different I guess.

You know IMO he doesn’t have a chance of being a Ram unless there is an injury to either RB.

What do you know or have seen from Williams? Talk about younger & more explosive.

I saw a lot of faults in Sony’s game.The fact he got cut has to tell the average fan there is something wrong with his game.If The Rams weren’t in some much need last season,NE would have been forced to cut Sony? Here we are a year later & there is Sony.
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,293
Name
Tim
How many time have any of us seen Funk working with the 1s? Any of our training camp Ramily have a take on that?

Sony was a great add last year but, they let him walk for a reason I doubt they push to get him back.
 

Rams43

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
4,195
I am in the camp that sees the Sony ship for the Rams has sailed.

He was a huge fill in last year but the ‘22 Rams are in an entirely different situation than when Sony came onboard last year.

Akers is not out for the year this year and KW has been added.

All 3 of our top RB’s are great pass receivers and I think McVay intends to take full advantage of that. That’s not a Sony strong suit.

If, heaven forbid, our RB corps is once again struck with injuries then Snead can always get an experienced vet to bring in. That position is the easiest to fill in the league.

So I just don’t see the need for a semi-pricey Sony at this time.
 

Tumak61

Pro Bowler
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Messages
1,358
Name
Tumak61
Michel only makes sense if the Rams plan to move on from Henderson or Akers. If McVay is good with Akers and Henderson then Michel makes zero sense.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
12,164
Name
Charlie
I agree. Michel saved us last year when we had RB problems. This time they wouldn't have to give up a pick for him.
 

F. Mulder

Starter
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
773
Why would we want Michel. He is another try hard, max effort guy with limited overall ability. There are numerous guys who are being cut from other teams who can do what he can do and more. Same with my least favorite player(s) Funk/Evans. I love the effort from Michel, but between his injuries and his libations, why do we want to keep going backwards when there are several players out there that can move us forward.?? Don’t get so sentimental
 

AvengerRam

Benevolent Troublemaker
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,392
I don't see the benefit of signing Michel at this point. Funk is a good special teams performer, and he's cheap.
 

ArkyRamsFan

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 6, 2016
Messages
1,956
For the record I appreciate greatly the contributions Sony Michel made for the Rams last year. But having said that it is significant to me that a HC like McDaniel who is thoroughly versed in the Shanahan running game cuts a RB like Michel anyway.

I dunno what is missing in Sony's game but that makes 3 teams in about a year now that have moved on from him.

~ArkyRamsFan~
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,050
Sony would be arguably the #1 RB on the team as it pertains to availability/production. (Clearly Akers ceiling is much higher)
That said, there's no reason to pick him up as he would have no role on the team. Kills me to say that since I'm as big a fan of his as there is.
Who knows, he might even be available for the PS, I think they can pay a vet 20k a game.
Hear me out, it is a little strange that Miami cut him since 850k of his contract is guaranteed. So he can pick up the 300k+ he loses by being the emergency backup RB on the Rams PS
That would be awesome
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,497
Michel only makes sense if the Rams plan to move on from Henderson or Akers. If McVay is good with Akers and Henderson then Michel makes zero sense.
Dilemma. We all see how dynamic Hendo can be when healthy. We also see how powerful Akers can be when healthy. Rams appear to be all in this year for these 2. However I believe one of them will fall and Michel adds good depth. Also unless Hendo explodes this year he is likely gone next year.
 

PressureD41

Les Snead's Draft Advisor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
3,813
Name
Eddy
no one is signing Sony until after wk 1, he's not worth the $ before wk 1 etc
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
12,176
no one is signing Sony until after wk 1, he's not worth the $ before wk 1 etc
This.

I believe Sony had a near vet minimum with the Fins didnt he?

I like our top 3 RB’s but not their health history and I’m sure Hendo will go down sooner or later before the middle of the year.

Michel is priceless as a 3rd down back and picking up blitz pickups which the other 3 struggle with at times historically.

I wouldn’t mind replacing Funk with him after week 1.


View: https://youtu.be/T6686ST2294
 
Last edited:

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,012
Name
Scott
Maybe if they keep both Roseboom and Hummel they could move on from Funk since an extra LB is available for STs.