Ray Lewis: We only know who Tom Brady is because of the tuck rule

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
That and his cheating coach.
***********************
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ow-who-tom-brady-is-because-of-the-tuck-rule/

Ray Lewis: We only know who Tom Brady is because of the tuck rule
Posted by Michael David Smith on January 14, 2015

t-bradythrowunderpressure.jpg
Getty Images

Ray Lewis believes the tuck rule is the only reason any of us knows who Tom Brady is.

Lewis told Stephen A. Smith on ESPN Radio that the Patriots getting the benefit of the infamous rule when Brady appeared to fumble in his first playoff start against the Raiders in January of 2002 is the reason he has a career today.

“When we — the first time we created something called a tuck rule, it’s the only reason we know — I’m just being honest — the only reason we know who Tom Brady is, because of a tuck rule,” Lewis said, via CBS Boston. “There’s no such thing as a tuck rule! If the ball is in your hand, and I knock it out your hand, whether it’s going backwards, forwards, lateral, sideways, however it’s coming out, that’s a freaking fumble! But guess what we created? We created a freaking tuck rule!”

Lewis noted that if the Patriots had lost that game to the Raiders, they wouldn’t have made it to the AFC Championship Game that year.

“They don’t go to that championship game — they don’t go to that championship game if that tuck rule, if that ball is not called a tuck! That’s a fumble!” Lewis said. “Charles Woodson made that man clearly fumble the ball and they named it the tuck rule, something that we’ve never heard in today’s game. So now you’ve got to ask yourself: When did the legacy really start?”

Well, yes, you could argue that Brady’s legacy really started with that tuck rule game. But even if you think that should have been a fumble, and that the Patriots should have been eliminated before Brady’s first Super Bowl, is that really the only reason we’ve heard of Tom Brady?

The tuck rule didn’t help the Patriots win the other two Super Bowls of Brady’s tenure as their starting quarterback. The tuck rule didn’t win Brady two regular-season MVP awards. The tuck rule didn’t make Brady lead the league in passing touchdowns three times or lead the league in passer rating and passing yards two other times. The tuck rule didn’t get Brady to nine Pro Bowls. Wouldn’t we have heard of Brady because of all those achievements, even if he hadn’t benefited from the tuck rule?

So it’s true that Brady’s reputation was built early in his career largely on the two postseason games the Patriots won after they beat the Raiders thanks to the tuck rule. But it’s ridiculous to suggest that the tuck rule is the only (or even the main) reason we know who Brady is. The tuck rule was 13 years ago. Brady has done pretty well for himself since then.
 

Blue and Gold

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,741
Name
B and G
It's funny, but Brady has proved to be great, post-tuck. It's like saying we only know Ray Lewis because of the stab rule.
 
Last edited:

Rmfnlt

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
5,342
Ray Lewis talking to Steven A. Smith... oh yeah, now I remember why I don't listen to ESPN.

Good, old Ray assumes Brady would have flamed out if the call sisn't go their way.

Gotta love Ray.
:eek:
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
It's funny, but Brady has proved to be great, post-tuck. It's like saying we only know ray Lewis because of the stab rule.

Good point. But that is how it all began for both Brady and Belichick. Had that play been ruled as a fumble, the Raiders might have eliminated the Patriots.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuck_Rule_Game

My view is that talent eventually wins out and that Brady still would have gone on to accomplish great things in his career. I only posted the article because I thought it was comical not that Lewis's comments had any relevance.
 

Ram Quixote

Knight Errant
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
2,923
Name
Tim
Think on this for a moment ... most NFL QBs experience some failure, but Brady's failures were washed away (tuck rule). Without the tuck rule, Brady is just like every other young QB, doubting himself because he lost the game on a fumble. Would those Patriots still go on a 7-game playoff winning streak? Or would that doubt chase Brady throughout his career?

The Brady of the tuck rule never knew any failure. Not in the playoffs.
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,997
Not only was the team cheating, but the league cheated for them. Gotta have a nice story line like having the patriots "win" the superbowl after 9/11 so everyone feels good about themselves. It's like WWE for adults. Why do we even watch this crap anymore?
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,608
Had that play been ruled as a fumble, the Raiders might have eliminated the Patriots.

what do you mean might have? the game was over when he fumbled. all the raiders players celebrated the victory then got told to go back out on the field. they couldn't psyche themselves up again and the patriots drove down the field for the fg to tie the game and send it to overtime.

.
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
18,198
Name
Haole
LOL

That Stephen A-hole Smith has a real quality program. Every single time I hear that idiot speak I want to tell him to shut the fuck up.

On the other hand, I enjoy hearing anyone trashing tom terrific.
 

Blue and Gold

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,741
Name
B and G
Good point. But that is how it all began for both Brady and Belichick. Had that play been ruled as a fumble, the Raiders might have eliminated the Patriots.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuck_Rule_Game

My view is that talent eventually wins out and that Brady still would have gone on to accomplish great things in his career. I only posted the article because I thought it was comical not that Lewis's comments had any relevance.
I understand, I like any shot taken at that 2001 Patsy team. I know you were not necessarily subscribing to that theory.
 

rams2050

Starter
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
588
I, like Blue and Gold, like any shot, no matter how low, aimed at the Cheats, Bill Belicheat, and his minion Tom Brady. I can't help but think they might have flamed out early had it not been for the NFL helping them to cheat their way to that first SB win at the expense of first the Raiders and then the Rams.

I can only hope that their cheating ways don't help them win out this year.
 

Rambitious1

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
4,554
Name
Tom
That and his cheating coach.
***********************
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ow-who-tom-brady-is-because-of-the-tuck-rule/

Ray Lewis: We only know who Tom Brady is because of the tuck rule
Posted by Michael David Smith on January 14, 2015

t-bradythrowunderpressure.jpg
Getty Images

Ray Lewis believes the tuck rule is the only reason any of us knows who Tom Brady is.

Lewis told Stephen A. Smith on ESPN Radio that the Patriots getting the benefit of the infamous rule when Brady appeared to fumble in his first playoff start against the Raiders in January of 2002 is the reason he has a career today.

“When we — the first time we created something called a tuck rule, it’s the only reason we know — I’m just being honest — the only reason we know who Tom Brady is, because of a tuck rule,” Lewis said, via CBS Boston. “There’s no such thing as a tuck rule! If the ball is in your hand, and I knock it out your hand, whether it’s going backwards, forwards, lateral, sideways, however it’s coming out, that’s a freaking fumble! But guess what we created? We created a freaking tuck rule!”

Lewis noted that if the Patriots had lost that game to the Raiders, they wouldn’t have made it to the AFC Championship Game that year.

“They don’t go to that championship game — they don’t go to that championship game if that tuck rule, if that ball is not called a tuck! That’s a fumble!” Lewis said. “Charles Woodson made that man clearly fumble the ball and they named it the tuck rule, something that we’ve never heard in today’s game. So now you’ve got to ask yourself: When did the legacy really start?”

Well, yes, you could argue that Brady’s legacy really started with that tuck rule game. But even if you think that should have been a fumble, and that the Patriots should have been eliminated before Brady’s first Super Bowl, is that really the only reason we’ve heard of Tom Brady?

The tuck rule didn’t help the Patriots win the other two Super Bowls of Brady’s tenure as their starting quarterback. The tuck rule didn’t win Brady two regular-season MVP awards. The tuck rule didn’t make Brady lead the league in passing touchdowns three times or lead the league in passer rating and passing yards two other times. The tuck rule didn’t get Brady to nine Pro Bowls. Wouldn’t we have heard of Brady because of all those achievements, even if he hadn’t benefited from the tuck rule?

So it’s true that Brady’s reputation was built early in his career largely on the two postseason games the Patriots won after they beat the Raiders thanks to the tuck rule. But it’s ridiculous to suggest that the tuck rule is the only (or even the main) reason we know who Brady is. The tuck rule was 13 years ago. Brady has done pretty well for himself since then.

Nope.
It's due to Spygate success.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Lewis is a jerkoff and a liar. Deer antler anyone?

Brady is one of the best QB's in the last 30 plus years. Tuck Rule has nothing to do with it.
 

BatteringRambo

Inked Gym Rat Stoner
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
3,893
Name
J.Fo
Hmmmm...

I still wonder what would have been... Rams/Raiders for the 'Patriotic' Super Bowl
 

Attachments

  • 3-the-tuck-rule-game-1026syb.jpg
    3-the-tuck-rule-game-1026syb.jpg
    83.4 KB · Views: 4,833

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
11,350
Name
Scott
I can't believe he's teamed up with Dilfer and Young.
Absolutely, the worst crew in the history of sports.
It's amazing to me those idiots even have jobs in broadcasting. Let alone together.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
12,180
I'm sorry I been trying to find that thread we had going with that guy who made a report with congress or something with all the facts of Spygate, how we got robbed, why we should care. I believe it was for congress or something. lol I don't remember . Does anybody have any idea what the hell I'm talking about? Had a lot of great points and facts.
 

Mikey Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
3,403
Name
Mike
Good point. But that is how it all began for both Brady and Belichick. Had that play been ruled as a fumble, the Raiders might have eliminated the Patriots.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuck_Rule_Game

My view is that talent eventually wins out and that Brady still would have gone on to accomplish great things in his career. I only posted the article because I thought it was comical not that Lewis's comments had any relevance.

IMO, Ray was so far out in left field that the ball is still rolling in the parking lot...Think what you like (I despise the entire organization), but that call certainly didn't define Brady's career...If anything would have kept him from his accomplishments, it would be Drew Bledsoe...
 

Boston Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
3,585
What always gets lost in this game was the clutch performance by Adam Vinatieri. He tied the game in a 46 yard FG into the snow driven wind with a inch or so of snow on the field. I remember not even being able to see the ball on TV because of the snow (or booze).

one of the more clutch FG I have ever seen.