Rating which teams are closest to being Super Bowl contenders/ESPN

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Rating which teams are closest to being Super Bowl contenders
By ESPN.com

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/page...contender-status-30-nfl-teams-make-super-bowl

With the Super Bowl matchup set -- Carolina vs. Denver on Feb. 7 -- we asked the NFL Nation reporters covering the 30 teams that won't be playing in February to answer a question:

From a scale of 1-10, how close is the team you cover to being a Super Bowl contender?

Here are there responses, with 1 being nowhere near close to being a contender and 10 being on the brink of playing in the 2017 Super Bowl:

10: On the cusp of a Super Bowl appearance

Arizona Cardinals: Despite a lopsided loss, Arizona is one of the most complete teams in the NFL with the highest-scoring offense to complement one of the best defenses. This season, the Cardinals were still on the cusp of a Super Bowl appearance without two of its top defensive players: safety Tyrann Mathieu and outside linebacker Alex Okafor. They'll be among the best teams next season. -- Josh Weinfuss

New England Patriots: The Patriots still have coach Bill Belichick, quarterback Tom Brady, wide receiver Julian Edelman, tight end Rob Gronkowski and a young core on defense that should have them right back in the Super Bowl mix next season. -- Mike Reiss

9: Most of the pieces to contend

Seattle Seahawks: The core is intact. Quarterback Russell Wilson made great strides in 2015, leading the NFL in passer rating, and he is only 27 years old. The defense is young and has finished first in fewest points allowed for four straight years. There are issues to be ironed out -- most notably on the offensive line -- but the Seahawks should go into the 2016 season as one of a handful of Super Bowl favorites. -- Sheil Kapadia

8: Close, but injuries, free agency loom

Pittsburgh Steelers: The Steelers were one Antonio Brown away from playing the Patriots in Foxborough this week with the AFC on the line. Pittsburgh is the closest it has been to a Super Bowl since the 2010 appearance against Green Bay. The defense isn't all the way there yet, but it's better than some think. For the offense, it's all about injuries, not personnel. If the running backs stay healthy and the line is relatively intact, quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, Brown and the passing game can do the rest. Pittsburgh took the loss to Denver harshly. This year will fuel them for another run. -- Jeremy Fowler

7: Talented but missing critical pieces

Green Bay Packers: The Packers were one of eight teams still playing on divisional playoff weekend, and they made it that far even though it was one of their worst offensive teams in years. They'll get Pro Bowl receiver Jordy Nelson back next season, and general manager Ted Thompson will surely add another weapon or two for quarterback Aaron Rodgers. The defense is finally back to being serviceable, and if the offense returns to its usual production, this team will be right there again. -- Rob Demovsky

Indianapolis Colts: Owner Jim Irsay has already said the offensive line has to get better and the Colts need to get younger at certain positions. The reason why the Colts, who missed the playoffs this season, are rated so high is is because quarterback Andrew Luck will be back after missing nine games and having the worst season of his four-year NFL career. When the Colts played the two teams that reached the AFC Championship Game this season, they beat Denver and only lost to New England by seven points. -- Mike Wells

Kansas City Chiefs: The Chiefs almost won their first divisional championship in five years this season, and with 11 wins were just a game behind the pacesetters in the AFC. But they were exposed in their playoff loss to the Patriots, a game that showed how far the Chiefs are from being elite. -- Adam Teicher

Minnesota Vikings: The Vikings need to fix their ragged offensive line. They need to add a dynamic receiving threat, and they need much more from quarterback Teddy Bridgewater, so they're not asking running back Adrian Peterson to account for nearly one-third of their yards again at age 31. But their defense should be one of the NFC's best again next year, and in Mike Zimmer the Vikings have a coach who has quickly changed the identity of the franchise. A few good offseason moves should have them among the NFC's contenders in 2016. -- Ben Goessling

Washington Redskins: This might be a bit optimistic, however, the Redskins have a good young core offensively, along the line and with talented targets in the passing game -- tight end Jordan Reed and receivers DeSean Jackson, Pierre Garcon and Jamison Crowder. Quarterback Kirk Cousins showed he could make this offense click. Cousins needs to show he can lead a team deep in the postseason, though (yes, the bar gets raised for him again). And the defense needs plenty of work, though they will be helped by the return of outside linebacker Junior Galette. Also, general manager Scot McCloughan's presence helps them in this quest. -- John Keim

6: More questions than answers

Cincinnati Bengals: Ask how close the Bengals were to a Super Bowl a year ago and this answer probably would have been an 8 or 9. But considering the personnel changes that are coming (and that already have come) to Cincinnati in the next few months, it doesn't appear the Bengals will be as good as they were during this past 12-4, AFC North-winning season. Not to mention, there's the fact the Bengals haven't been to the Super Bowl in 27 years. Cincinnati still will have a talented team in 2016. But five straight wild-card round exits make it hard believing it is a true Lombardi Trophy contender. -- Coley Harvey

New Orleans Saints: The Saints have the most important ingredient of all -- an elite quarterback in Drew Brees, who was already a Super Bowl MVP six years ago. They also have a proven, Super Bowl-winning coach in Asshole Face. However, New Orleans has suffered through back-to-back 7-9 seasons because it has featured one of the NFL's worst defenses and the offensive line has regressed a bit since it was arguably the best in the league from 2009-2011. The Saints do feel like their arrow is pointed back in the right direction after they overhauled the roster last year with nine rookies and five first-year players. But the defense will have to make major strides in coordinator Dennis Allen's first full year on the job to make any kind of run at the Super Bowl. -- Mike Triplett

New York Jets: They have to make the playoffs first, and they haven't done that in five years. The Jets have a win-now roster, with older players such as wide receiver Brandon Marshall, cornerback Darrelle Revis and quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick (assuming he re-signs), but they need young playmakers at linebacker and running back to reach the next level -- and the level after that. -- Rich Cimini

Oakland Raiders: The Raiders have five Pro Bowlers on their roster for the first time since their last Super Bowl season, in 2002 and more than doubled their win total, going from 3-13 to 7-9. Oakland also has a young nucleus on the rise in quarterback Derek Carr and wide receiver Amari Cooper and outside linebacker Khalil Mack. The worm seems to have finally turned for the Raiders, as none of their offseason drama has anything to do with a coach or players. Now, if only we knew where they were going to play in 2016. -- Paul Gutierrez

5: In the middle of the pack

Baltimore Ravens: The Ravens are difficult to gauge. Two seasons ago, Baltimore was leading eventual Super Bowl champion New England by two touchdowns in the divisional playoffs. Last season, the Ravens had the fifth-most losses in the NFL with 11. Their Super Bowl hopes come down to whether they can stay healthy, draft a couple of impact players and get strong seasons from their older playmakers (wide receiver Steve Smith and outside linebackers Terrell Suggs and Elvis Dumervil). -- Jamison Hensley

Buffalo Bills: It's tough to rate a team that hasn't made the playoffs in 16 years any higher than this, but the Bills have talent that is average to above-average for the NFL. They've advanced from what would have been a 1, 2 or 3 rating a few years ago to where they are now. How can they get to a 6, 7 or 8 rating by this time next year? Quarterback Tyrod Taylor's development and the potential rebound of Rex Ryan's defense will be the keys. -- Mike Rodak

Dallas Cowboys: How can the team that had the worst record in the NFC have a shot to contend next year? It's completely dependent on the return to health of quarterback Tony Romo and wide receiver Dez Bryant. Romo played parts of four games and the team went 3-1. Bryant had the worst season of his career because of a broken right foot. When they are right, the Cowboys are right. They have issues elsewhere on the roster, but Romo and Bryant can help cover them up by being one of the best quarterback/receiver combinations in the league. -- Todd Archer

Detroit Lions: The Lions have never been to a Super Bowl. They've been to just one conference championship game. Yet the talent on the roster and the aptitude of their coordinators gives them a chance. For the number to get any higher, Detroit would need to retain wide receiver Calvin Johnson, upgrade on the offensive line, the defensive line and linebacker and secure a high-level cornerback to pair opposite Darius Slay. If Johnson retires, the number probably drops to a 3 or 4 depending on whom the team finds as a replacement. -- Michael Rothstein

4: Lots of work to do

Atlanta Falcons: The Falcons still have some major rebuilding to do in order to get the roster to compete with a difficult 2016 schedule, let alone compete for a Super Bowl. Getting a secondary receiving threat opposite Julio Jones, bolstering the interior of the offensive line, and adding defensive playmakers on the defensive line and at linebacker could help the cause, but that likely can't all be fixed in one year. -- Vaughn McClure

Chicago Bears: A Super Bowl contender in 2016? That's hard to fathom from a franchise that has not even reached the postseason since 2010. The Bears have a couple pieces to build around -- offensive lineman Kyle Long, wide receiver Alshon Jeffery (assuming he's back), running back Jeremy Langford, safety Adrian Amos and cornerback Kyle Fuller -- but a ton has to happen this offseason to close to gap between Green Bay and Minnesota in the NFC North. Should be the Bears win more than six games in 2016? Yes. The club has ample salary cap space, the 11th overall pick in the draft and veteran coaches who seem to know what they are doing. But Super Bowl contenders? I don't see it. At least not next year. -- Jeff Dickerson

Miami Dolphins: I thought the Dolphins were closer than this at the beginning of last season. But they had one of their most disappointing and underachieving seasons in recent memory by finishing 6-10. A new rookie coach in Adam Gase means Miami will be a rebuilding team in transition in 2016. A .500 finish isn't a bad goal for Gase's first year. The Dolphins were 1-5 against the division last season and need to improve there, first and foremost, before even thinking about making a Super Bowl run. -- James Walker

Philadelphia Eagles: A team can't be too close to winning a Super Bowl if it just fired its head coach, but the Eagles aren't completely out of the running. Chip Kelly's team was 10-6 each of the past two seasons before things went south in 2015. Doug Pederson has something from which to work, and his choice of Jim Schwartz to restore the Eagles' defense should shorten the rebuilding process. Still, the Eagles have a long way to go. -- Phil Sheridan

San Diego Chargers: The Chargers have the quarterback in place to lead them to the big game in Philip Rivers, but they have a lot of work to do in building around him. San Diego must revamp its offensive line, bring in a couple playmakers on offense and add more beef up front to an improving, young defense. If all goes well, the Chargers could be right back in postseason contention. -- Eric D. Williams

3: Talent, depth needed

Houston Texans: They have pieces in place on defense, but offensively the Texans have some work to do. How quickly they'll be able to do that work is debatable. They need to solve their quarterback problem and figure out how to replace running back Arian Foster on a permanent basis. -- Tania Ganguli

Jacksonville Jaguars: The Jaguars have won just 12 games the past three seasons, and they have a lot of work to do on defense. However, they appear to have found their franchise quarterback in Blake Bortles and that's the No. 1 criteria for reaching a Super Bowl. Plus, they've got playmakers on offense in pass-catchers Allen Robinson, Allen Hurns and Julius Thomas. Until the Jaguars make strides on defense, however, they won't be a playoff team. -- Mike DiRocco

Los Angeles Rams: The Rams haven't even been to the playoffs since 2004 or had a winning record since 2003. The number would be higher if it was "playoff contender," but this is for the Super Bowl. There's some good pieces in place for the future but this team also has major questions to answer this offseason on the free agent front. Until the Rams have an offense that can be at least middle of the road and/or a coach that proves capable of doing better than seven wins with this team, the Super Bowl looks to be a long way off. -- Nick Wagoner

New York Giants: Same as their current number of consecutive losing seasons. The Giants' roster is a complete mess and needs major improvement this offseason to even think about being an NFC East contender. As for the Super Bowl? Well, for years we've said you couldn't count out the Giants because you knew they had the quarterback and the coach who could deliver a title if given a good enough supporting cast. A couple of weeks back, though, they got rid of the coach, and the new coach has never done this job before. There's reason to think a good offseason could make the Giants better than the 6-10 they've been the past two years, but they're a long, long way from being a championship contender again. -- Dan Graziano

San Francisco 49ers: The Niners are in full rebuilding mode now with Chip Kelly hired to not only fix the offense, which was 31st in the league while scoring the fewest points in the NFL, but the culture, too. The roster has a few bright spots, but depth is a big issue. And the roster, as is, does not fit Kelly's quick-tempo philosophy. Sure, Kelly took the Eagles from 4-12 to 10-6 and a division crown his first year in Philly, but that roster was ready-made. Same as the 2011 Niners with then-rookie coach Jim Harbaugh. This does not feel close. Not in January, anyway. -- Paul Gutierrez

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: The Bucs appear to have found the most important piece in quarterback Jameis Winston, who was just the third rookie QB to surpass 4,000 yards passing. There are playmakers on offense in wide receiver Mike Evans and running back Doug Martin (if he returns), but the Bucs have to fix defensive issues on third down (30th in 2015) and in points allowed (26th) before they can make a serious run at the playoffs. Playing in the same division at Carolina doesn't help, either. -- Mike DiRocco

2: Big rebuilding job ahead

Tennessee Titans: It's not a 1 only because the Titans got quarterback Marcus Mariota in the 2015 draft. Tennessee is the worst team in the NFL over the past two seasons, as far as can be from the title game. New general manager Jon Robinson is charged with rebuilding a terrible roster. -- Paul Kuharsky

1: Nowhere close

Cleveland Browns: No long-term solution at quarterback, another new coach, seven seasons of at least 11 losses in the past eight and one playoff game (one!) since 1999. The Browns arrow isn't close to pointing up, not even in a league where one-season turnarounds are possible. -- Pat McManamon
 

BatteringRambo

Inked Gym Rat Stoner
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
3,893
Name
J.Fo
Hey now! An average of 7 wins per NFL regular season ain't all that bad, ya know.
 

Roman Snow

H.I.M.
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
2,615
Name
John
Really Waggoner? What is up with guys covering the Rams and absolute cynicism? Are you sure JT didn't write this?

I would seriously put us around a 7. Grant it, the most important position on the field-quarterback-may be our weakest, along with receiver, but that is where the 7 comes in.

3? A freaking 3? That is a team that needs gutting. We are alongside the Niners? The Seaturds are a 9? I get it. Quarterback stability is huge. But please. We compete well with them. Indy, Minnesota and Washington a 7? I'll put our roster against all of them. We are better.

With a fairly high 1 and two second round picks, plus the allure of Los Angeles to Free Agents, I predict the following:

  • We lose only one key defender in Free Agency, but sign one or two as well. With guys coming back healthy, and many guys coming into their prime, we will be in the conversation as one of the best defenses in the league.
  • Our Offensive line will add one more key cog, probably at center, and really click and open holes for Gurley. Gurley will have 1,500 yards 14 tds plus 2 receiving. The line will also pass protect well for our starting quarterback.
  • Receiver: a definite area of need. I really thought Stedman was going to develop into a Henry Ellard type player for us. Who knows miracles may happen for him. But moving forward Tavon is a keeper and Britt will be a good 2 if we can get that #1 guy. Not a ton of holes here though. Not a "do over".
  • Quarterback: We don't have the solution yet. Keenum? Stop gap. Mannion? Wild card. What if he develops over the off season? Odds are though that we may need a big splash in the draft or Free Agency to save lots of jobs.
  • Special teams? Despite the last middle of the pack ranking, they are very solid. I think Zuerline sticks (scared straight.) and has a solid year and Hekker is Hekker.
So, Nick Waggoner, pull your head out, we are on the cusp of greatness!. ...3...
 

Psycho_X

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,107
Agree with the rating for the most part, all though I'd be more inclined to put us in the (4) category so a slight bump. Yes we have some good depth for most of the team but unfortunately we need a QB and WRs. Unfortunately, once we got those I'm not sure our coaches would know what to do with them anyway. And that's why I'd leave us around that area.... I don't trust the coaches to get even a middle of the road offense in today's NFL.

I hope they prove me wrong.
 

Jorgeh0605

You had me at meat tornado.
2023 ROD Fantasy Champion
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,913
A lot of this is because half of our defense are FAs. Realize that.
 

RAMSinLA

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
3,069
I see a lot more potential than Nick I guess. If the Rams can keep this defense together and on the field....and add to it for next season well it's defenses that win Championships. Who knows? That's why we watch. To see the impossible happen.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,671
These types of articles are a waste of time. Fortunes rise and fall every year, but the media can only see the result of the previous season. Rams lost and have FAs, so the best we can hope for is 7 wins or whatever. Yeah, thanks Wags.

Also, there are many teams that are already legitimate contenders. Seahawks gave the Panthers everything they could handle. Cincinnati lost their QB and still almost advanced with a kid at QB but were thwarted by a fumble and stupidity. Steelers had receivers open all over the joint on Denver and are without a doubt a contender as long as Big Ben is healthy. And so on and so forth.

Waste of time to read that IMO.
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
Los Angeles Rams: The Rams haven't even been to the playoffs since 2004 or had a winning record since 2003. The number would be higher if it was "playoff contender," but this is for the Super Bowl. There's some good pieces in place for the future but this team also has major questions to answer this offseason on the free agent front. Until the Rams have an offense that can be at least middle of the road and/or a coach that proves capable of doing better than seven wins with this team, the Super Bowl looks to be a long way off. -- Nick Wagoner
That's my boy, Wagoner!! He really know's how to pump-up the Fan Base!!
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
They're only a QB and one good wideout away.
That's all.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,019
Cam Newton showing how a franchise QB with average WR can win. Having Gurley lessens the need for top 5 QB, with Rams D I don't see any reason why the Rams cant make a deep post season run with a minimal mistake type offense. See Roethlisberger and Flacco
 

The Rammer

ESPN Draft Guru
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
2,400
Name
Rick
IF we find a franchise/ reliable QB and get our FA's squared away and cut some loose ties we will be in the running for the playoffs next year. God I hope we get a franchise QB this draft!
 

FrankenRam

Starter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
526
......
With a fairly high 1 and two second round picks, plus the allure of Los Angeles to Free Agents, I predict the following:
...

IMO, you overrate the allure of LA for FA's. It may be a factor for young single guys, but that's about it. For the large majority of those who will be entering FA for the first time, the attractions will be...1) $$, and....2) What does Mama want. And in some cases, those might be reversed.

The smart ones might even view the Cali income tax rate as a significant deterrent. Of course, we're talking football jocks here, so this is likely not a significant factor for many.
 

Roman Snow

H.I.M.
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
2,615
Name
John
IMO, you overrate the allure of LA for FA's. It may be a factor for young single guys, but that's about it. For the large majority of those who will be entering FA for the first time, the attractions will be...1) $$, and....2) What does Mama want. And in some cases, those might be reversed.

The smart ones might even view the Cali income tax rate as a significant deterrent. Of course, we're talking football jocks here, so this is likely not a significant factor for many.

You make a good point about the income tax. It balances out the attraction and may cause us to have to "overpay" guys to offset the commie taxes we have to pay here. Believe me, there is an arrogance about California legislators I am aware of that.

But these guys are not just dumb jocks. Even if they are, their agents are not. Obviously it is the high end guy that can make endorsement money, etc. But even a mid level guy might be more attracted to LA vs. St Louis.
 

gabriel18

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
5,076
Opinions are like A holes
Everybody has one
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,744
They're only a QB and one good wideout away.
That's all.
I have to agree, assuming we can retain our defensive FAs.

If I'm Snead, I'm going all in on getting the best possible players at those two positions, we have talent and depth pretty much everywhere else on the roster.
 

FrankenRam

Starter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
526
But these guys are not just dumb jocks. Even if they are, their agents are not. Obviously it is the high end guy that can make endorsement money, etc. But even a mid level guy might be more attracted to LA vs. St Louis.

Very likely some would be more attracted to LA vs STL. No doubt. But it's also possible the reverse could be true in some cases as well. It's always surprised me how many pro jocks that played whatever sport have made their home here even once their career has ended.

Based on the number of former pro players we here about in all sports winding up in bankruptcy court, I'm inclined to stick by my previous statement. Heck, if you'd have thrown the money at me when I was 25-30 that some of these guys are making, I may have been one of them.