Rams Rob Boras, bed are strangers lately

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,001
Name
Dennis
Rams’ Rob Boras, bed are strangers lately

By Vincent Bonsignore, Los Angeles Daily News

[www.dailynews.com]

TAMPA BAY >> The tossing and turning through sleepless nights has been all too prevalent these days for Rob Boras. And that’s after the Rams offensive coordinator finally pulls himself away from the game plans and play books and video clips he scours over at un-Godly hours of the night in search of some shut eye.

“What’s sleep?” Boras asked rhetorically.

He was responding to a question about the toll of the last two weeks while bearing the burden of the Rams offensive struggles.

To be blunt, he isn’t sleeping very well at all.

“I don’t think any of us are.” Boras said.

To be expected.

And as he and the Rams arrive in Tampa Bay to play the Buccaneers Sunday, they are in search of answers to an offensive riddle that’s left everyone befuddled.

Continued failure to do so will eventually cause a ripple effect of consequences.

“This week is a new challenge with Tampa Bay and the guys have accepted it,” Boras said. “They recognize that we’ve fallen short.”

Who hasn’t?

The Rams have gone eight quarters without scoring a touchdown this year, the measly nine points they’ve posted coming on three field goals and representing the lowest scoring total in the National Football League.

They rank dead last in points per game, yards per game, yards per play, passing yards, first downs, third downs converted and third down conversion percentage.

Case Keenum, the game manager the Rams were counting on to provide efficiency and dependability at quarterback, has an league-worst 57.8 quarterback rating among NFL starters.

Todd Gurley, the second-year star running back, is 107th in the NFL in yards per carry at 2.7.

Tavon Austin, whom the Rams rewarded a new $42 million contract extension and worked all offseason and training camp to unleash on the NFL, has been targeted 22 times — fifth in the NFL — but is 41st in receptions and ranks 200th in yards per catch at 7.0.

Even when the Rams have strung together positive plays or mounted meaningful drives, they’ve sabotaged their goal line aspirations with silly mistakes.

“Negative plays in the red zone, whether its penalties, negative runs, sacks, those are all really big mistakes that you can’t make,” Keenum said. “You have to have a really good play to make up for those. We’ve got to get better at that, we got to get better at red zone, explosive plays, and then stringing together those plays. We had some good plays, but we couldn’t string enough together to put a drive in the end zone.”

You can twist and turn numbers and words to deliver any message you want these day, but it’s impossible not to look at the Rams’ offensive statistics and not come to a very bleak conclusion: They’ve played downright horrible so far.

And for the man in charge of it all, a coach the Rams elevated to offensive coordinator over the last four games of 2015 and then entrusted with the job full time during the offseason, it’s the source of tremendous frustration.

“That’s our job, so I’d be ignorant to say otherwise,” Boras said.

The angst is everywhere.

“We all take it personal — players and coaches,” Boras said. “We understand that’s our responsibility.”

Or, as Rams head coach Jeff Fisher put it: “Anybody that knows this game would be concerned about not scoring touchdowns, now come on. I don’t mean to be disrespectful, but we need to score some touchdowns.”

Two saving graces are the source of hope — or at least provide some positivity in a high tide of negativity.

The Rams are 1-1 while playing some especially bad offense. Things would look a hell of a lot worse standing in an 0-2 hole.

And as terrible as they’ve been, two games is still an incredibly small sample size.

So there’s that, at least.

In all seriousness, there are some things trending in the right direction. You might have to look really, really hard to find them, but they’re there.

Despite not punching the ball over the goal line in Sunday’s 9-3 win over the Seattle Seahawks, the Rams did drive into scoring range three times and did play sufficient situational football in order to consistently win the field position battle.

“It was a step in the right direction. Obviously, it’s just a step. We need to take bigger strides,” Boras said. “The thing we challenged everybody with is making some plays down the field, and I think you saw a combination of (Q
cool.gif
Case (Keenum) and (TE) Lance (Kendricks), and Case and (WR) Kenny (Britt).”

The mandate for bigger plays can’t be understated. The Rams need to stretch the field more and create some big-chunk yardage plays rather than moving the ball incrementally.

“It’s hard to drive and score points four yards at a time, and the fact that we pushed the ball down the field, I thought was a good thing,” Boras said. “Even if it was defensive pass interference, we’re gaining chunks of yards.”

By doing so it will help open things up for Gurley, who is consistently running into eight- and nine-man defensive walls so far.

Of all the Rams disappointments, not getting Gurley untracked tops the list. And that falls on everyone.

“It’s a combination, right, it’s the ultimate team game, it takes 11 guys to protect the quarterback, it takes 11 guys to be able to run the football,” Boras said. “It’s just like anything, when things aren’t going well in business or in football, it’s not always the same guy. It’s one guy has a break down here, one guy might have a break down there. When we’re going to hit on 11 cylinders, which we’ve done in the past and we’re going to continue to do, you’ll see the success that we’re going to have.”

In theory, at least.

But it’s time to actually see it.

If not, the sleepless nights will continue.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,990

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,001
Name
Dennis
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
Coach Rob Boras and his reaction to the lack of scoring on offense:
Boris_Badenov_Wallpaper_by_StarScout_lost.png
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
“It’s hard to drive and score points four yards at a time, and the fact that we pushed the ball down the field, I thought was a good thing,” Boras said. “Even if it was defensive pass interference, we’re gaining chunks of yards.”

Eh. The Hags were opens up in the secondary on purpose obviously. Make Keenum beat them. And he didn't. If Wussell wasn't a gimp that game, they had the Rams right where they wanted and were marching down field till the midgets ankle couldn't hold up anymore.

Chunk yards don't matter when you aren't reaching pay dirt.

Let's see if the old man football continues today.

Almost hope it does for a quarter or two so they're forced to put Goff in. Keenum literally sucks the fun out of watching football.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,450
Name
Mack
Sorry, but I have to be pedantic here.

The phrase is "on track", not untracked. The point is to get a person's production aligned with their goals, for example. Thus, we have the use of the term, "on track".

He's currently "untracked". His goals do not track with his production. This goes when using any alignment allusion.

Who's his editor?
 

Roman Snow

H.I.M.
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
2,615
Name
John
Him having sleepless nights isn't a huge virtue to me. I'd rather hear he is sleeping fine and they have a game plan.

I see some good signs with the plays, I'm more worried about the blocking schemes and these guys opening holes ( :rant: or at least creases!) for Gurley.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
23,001
Name
Dennis
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
Who's his editor?

Seriously Mac, in today's age of words like agreeance, conversating and irregardless, I think I can give him a pass, but I concur.
 
Last edited:

Roman Snow

H.I.M.
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
2,615
Name
John
Sorry, but I have to be pedantic here.

The phrase is "on track", not untracked. The point is to get a person's production aligned with their goals, for example. Thus, we have the use of the term, "on track".

He's currently "untracked". His goals do not track with his production. This goes when using any alignment allusion.

Who's his editor?
Thanks Mac. I thought the same thing. By the way I "prolly" "should of" said something "to", but "I could care less". :whistle:
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Sorry, but I have to be pedantic here.

The phrase is "on track", not untracked. The point is to get a person's production aligned with their goals, for example. Thus, we have the use of the term, "on track".

He's currently "untracked". His goals do not track with his production. This goes when using any alignment allusion.

Who's his editor?
His editor is untracked. Meaning, nobody can track him down. (rimshot).

Otherwise, that article is on point. This offense is historically bad and Boras has to accept a portion of the blame. Keenum as well. As does the O-line, and even Gurley (yes, he's missed some opportunities too). They were able to move the ball against the Seahawks, who are always at the top of the league in defensive yards allowed, defensive points allowed, and total defense, but they've CLEARLY gotta start getting creative in short-field situations on the whole.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,450
Name
Mack
His editor is untracked. Meaning, nobody can track him down. (rimshot).

Otherwise, that article is on point. This offense is historically bad and Boras has to accept a portion of the blame. Keenum as well. As does the O-line, and even Gurley (yes, he's missed some opportunities too). They were able to move the ball against the Seahawks, who are always at the top of the league in defensive yards allowed, defensive points allowed, and total defense, but they've CLEARLY gotta start getting creative in short-field situations on the whole.

Well, it's pointing out the obvious.

The more important issue is that this scheme is broken.

It's like if I had to paint a picture with my feet using paint brushes. Now, I could potentially be VERY creative and make something barely passable... OR... I could stop using my freaking feet. Ya know, cuz I'm blessed to have hands and all. So, would the picture be better if I got more creative and dedicated myself to strengthening my feet to have better brush technique? I suppose. But I'm certain the path to making art that doesn't scare small children lies in not using my feet for anything other than wearing sandals...
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Well, it's pointing out the obvious.

The more important issue is that this scheme is broken.

It's like if I had to paint a picture with my feet using paint brushes. Now, I could potentially be VERY creative and make something barely passable... OR... I could stop using my freaking feet. Ya know, cuz I'm blessed to have hands and all. So, would the picture be better if I got more creative and dedicated myself to strengthening my feet to have better brush technique? I suppose. But I'm certain the path to making art that doesn't scare small children lies in not using my feet for anything other than wearing sandals...
You certainly have a flair for the analogous. :LOL:
 

RamBall

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
5,732
Name
Dave
Eh. The Hags were opens up in the secondary on purpose obviously. Make Keenum beat them. And he didn't. If Wussell wasn't a gimp that game, they had the Rams right where they wanted and were marching down field till the midgets ankle couldn't hold up anymore.

Chunk yards don't matter when you aren't reaching pay dirt.

Let's see if the old man football continues today.

Almost hope it does for a quarter or two so they're forced to put Goff in. Keenum literally sucks the fun out of watching football.

I think RWs ankle was the reason he had one of his better games against the Rams. Only 2 sacks and no TOs is the best stat line RW has ever seen after playing the Rams, without the gimpy anle he gets sacked 4 or more times and loses at least 1 fumble. Plus he didnt look to be limping, I dont think his ankle played as big a part in the shecocks losing as the Rams D did.