I think they should cut Bradford if they can get Foles.
Rams reportedly interested in Foles
- Thread starter jrc
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 1,916
Why cut Bradford right away if they obtain Foles? Wouldn't you let them battle it out in camp to decide who is the better QB? If it truly is Bradford, Foles is a great backup (and is paid like one). If Foles beats out Bradford, we can cut Bradford and move on, using the extra cap space to resign other players whose contracts expire later. Why cut him as soon as you obtain Foles?
Memphis Ram
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 7,352
View: https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/574710220577992704
Foles might already be dealt and we don't know it yet. Maybe a handshake deal involving the Eagles moving up for Mariota. I could see the Titans being all over such a deal.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 23,002
- Name
- Dennis
Correct if the Eagles are moving up to get Mariota then Foles is involved in the deal, IMO, with the Jets perhaps, but the Rams could throw a monkey wrench into things and trade up with the Jaguars, but that won't happen as the Rams seem okay being on the outside looking in.
ram007
Starter
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2014
- Messages
- 830
QBs lose too much if they are not working with their offensive team. Bradford coming back after nearly 20 month absence means, he will end up in the bottom 16 when 2015 comes to a pass. I have no confidence in this man except that he is the best option for 2015. Period.
mr.stlouis
Legend
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 6,454
- Name
- Main Hook
MFaulk107
The Realness
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2013
- Messages
- 567
HAVE FAITH DAMMIT!
ram007
Starter
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2014
- Messages
- 830
Alright. Alright. Don't scream at me. I will continue to pretend I have faith in him.
MFaulk107
The Realness
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2013
- Messages
- 567
That's all us Bradford fans ask of you.
I most defiantly understand where your coming with him not in the O for some months, but it's not like he hasn't been with them at all for 20 months.
They talk and have practice all the time together.....just not many regular season games with each other.
And as you said, he is our best option if we were to bring in anyone, I'd gurantee Bradford would beat them out for the starting job.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,941
The point of acquiring Foles would be to keep Bradford. That would give us two QBs with season ending injuries last year. Hopefully, the pair of them could play a combined 16 games and then we could decide who we want to keep after the season.(because both are in the last year of their contract)
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2011
- Messages
- 16,608
amen to that. let them fight it out. we know foles can be good and limit turnovers although he was shaky last season. still a better option in my eyes than cutler.
.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,941
Maybe. But he's going to cost a lot more than Cutler in terms of draft pick compensation and Foles has been a very turnover prone guy too aside from the 2013 season. In 2014, he turned it over 13 times in 8 games. In 2012 under Andy Reid, he turned it over 8 times in 7 games.
So you take the good with the bad...in Foles's case, we'll have to either trade down with Philly or give up a draft pick to get him but we keep Bradford and Foles is younger than Cutler. However, Foles or Bradford are going to have to get paid after the season if we want to keep them and it's possible that neither are our QB of the future. In Cutler's case, we don't keep Bradford but we also likely don't give up a draft pick. However, Cutler is about $1.1 million more expensive this year than the Foles/Bradford combo and we'd have to pay him $16 million in 2016 but that also gives us time to find a QB of the future. Pros and cons to both deals.
HometownBoy
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 3,527
- Name
- Aaron
If we get Foles, I don't see us cutting ties from Bradford, it'd really just put us right back in the same situation we're already in right now. A complete unknown who we have no idea if he can do it or not. Might as well keep them and let them duke it out in camp. Lighting a fire under Bradford's ass might actually do something worthwhile.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 23,002
- Name
- Dennis
That would be a grand plan, however, IMO, Foles either stays of is part of the trade up deal for Mariota.
Mikey Ram
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3,403
- Name
- Mike
What are the Eaglets doing ??? Cut McCoy only to apparently pick up Frank Gore...'Splain that one to me please
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 23,002
- Name
- Dennis
They are going with a committee approach and Gore is part of that committee and will end up costing much less.
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 49,231
- Name
- Burger man
That's it.
Me; if I'm building a team I'm not sinking a lot of money in a RB. That money is needed elsewhere.
I'm filling the position with a steady diet of young legs, mid/late picks, UDFA. If I want some experience mixed in, maybe a short deal with a guy like Gore.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 23,002
- Name
- Dennis
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,941
If I'm building a team, I'm utilizing the talent I have and the talent I can acquire. Basically, if Marshall Faulk wants to be the highest paid HB in the league and the Colts don't want to pay him...I'll happily pay him and take him off their hands at a discount.