Rams rely on youth in massive makeover

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Jim Thomas
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/rams-rely-on-youth-in-massive-makeover/article_d3d746a5-7e1d-543e-90af-e01d0fc16b35.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football ... 16b35.html</a>

514b39f744894.preview-620.jpg



PHOENIX, Ariz. • Not many teams can lose their leading rusher and two of their top three wide receivers, and say with a straight face that they’re looking for improvement next season on offense.

But that’s where the Rams stand after losing running back Steven Jackson (to Atlanta) and wide receivers Danny Amendola (New England) and Brandon Gibson (Miami) in free agency.

With the “garage sale” phase of free agency about to start and the draft still to come, it’s safe to say the St. Louis offense will undergo a massive makeover for 2013. This was partly by design and partly because of outside circumstances.

At the NFC coaches’ breakfast Wednesday, Jeff Fisher said he knew it was possible that Jackson, Amendola and Gibson could all land elsewhere in free agency.

“We’ve known obviously since September about ‘Jack’s’ future,” Fisher said, referring to the change in Jackson’s contract made at that time, allowing him to void the final year of his contract. “It was a good situation for both sides.”

As for Amendola, Fisher said Wednesday the Rams got a strong hint from Amendola’s agents about where things might be headed in September as well.

“We made an attempt to (negotiate with) Danny in September and they decided to wait,” Fisher said. “They had made their mind up that they were gonna wait — just wait till free agency.

“Our issue with Danny was — we didn’t want to lose Danny; we were willing to pay Danny — but Danny had missed a lot of games. So our preference was as we were going through this, is he needed to be on the field to get paid, which makes sense. They understood that, and we understood that. You know, it just didn’t work out. But he’ll do well and we’ll have options.”

When it comes to those “options” at wide receiver and also at running back, Fisher was speaking specifically of the Rams’ draft class of 2012. Namely, wideouts Chris Givens and Brian Quick, and running backs Daryl Richardson and Isaiah Pead.

“We’ve always said that players make their biggest improvement from year one to year two,” Fisher said.

And it begins with the offseason conditioning program, which for the Rams starts April 15.

“Brian’s second year in the system, we expect him to (develop),” Fisher said. “The guy’s gonna make a lot of plays for us. And the same’s the case for Chris and Isaiah. Those three are gonna have to step up and play some major roles in our offense.”

Givens was the most productive of those 2012 rookies, leading the Rams with 698 receiving yards on 42 catches. Early in the season he caught passes of 50 yards-plus in five consecutive games, becoming the first rookie in league history to do so.

As the season progressed, Givens got more comfortable running short and intermediate routes, which made him more than a one-trick pony.

“He improved weekly,” Fisher said. “We were able to do more and more with him as he got more familiar. I think he knows that this is his opportunity.”

Austin Pettis obviously is being counted on at wide receiver. And potentially, the Rams could have one of the league’s better pass-catching tandems in tight ends Jared Cook and Lance Kendricks.

Opportunity also is knocking in the backfield, where it sounds like Pead has a chance to start in 2013 after barely getting off the bench last season.

“He just didn’t get a chance because of the other two,” Fisher said, referring to Jackson and Richardson. “But he’ll get his opportunity this year. ... He’s got a chance to make a lot of big plays for us.”

Pead missed almost all of the spring practice period because his college (Cincinnati) was on the quarter system, meaning its school year ended late. As a result, NFL rules didn’t make Pead available to the Rams until June other than the post-draft minicamp.

[hil]So the Rams have high hopes for Pead, which was illustrated when Fisher was asked if Pead would be used on punt and kickoff returns in 2013.

“Probably not,” Fisher said. “If at all, it would be in the kickoff (returns) as opposed to punts. But if things work out, you typically don’t use one of your top backs as a returner.”[/hil]

Don’t forget Richardson. Fisher hasn’t, even though Richardson’s playing time plummeted over the second half of last season.

“We’ve got to get the ball to him in the passing game more so than we did (in 2012),” Fisher said. “We were spreading it around, but we weren’t necessarily going to the backs as much as we would’ve liked. It would be a great situation where that’s an extension of the run game, to get him out in space.”

Other than Pead and Richardson, the Rams have only two other running backs on their current roster in Terrance Ganaway and Chase Reynolds. The Rams almost certainly will add a couple of more backs to the roster before the start of training camp.

One of those backs could be a draft pick. Maybe even a high draft pick. (Eddie Lacy, that’s your cue.) But three weeks into March, Fisher isn’t certain how the running back depth chart will shake out “A.J.” — After Jackson, that is.

“We’ll fill the position,” Fisher said. “When and how I don’t know.”

Follow Jim Thomas on twitter @jthom1
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
Graphicker said:
Pead man! I see that guy as Shady mCoy light.

He's going to be a great one.
Yeah. That's what's up. :bg:
 

rickrawk

Starter
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
908
Name
Rick
Pead is gonna surprise alot of people this year. Same with Brian Quick. I trust Snead & Fisher, and if they didn't expect big things from those two, they would've done a lot more in free agency.
Am I the only one who thinks we will be very good on offense in 2013?

GO RAMS!!!!
 

A55VA6

Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
8,208
rickrawk said:
Pead is gonna surprise alot of people this year. Same with Brian Quick. I trust Snead & Fisher, and if they didn't expect big things from those two, they would've done a lot more in free agency.
Am I the only one who thinks we will be very good on offense in 2013?

GO RAMS!!!!
Agreed. Plus Bradford in the same offense for 2 years in a row. He's going to really play well.
 

Rabid Ram

Legend
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
7,360
Name
Dustin
A55VA6 said:
rickrawk said:
Pead is gonna surprise alot of people this year. Same with Brian Quick. I trust Snead & Fisher, and if they didn't expect big things from those two, they would've done a lot more in free agency.
Am I the only one who thinks we will be very good on offense in 2013?

GO RAMS!!!!
Agreed. Plus Bradford in the same offense for 2 years in a row. He's going to really play well.


I think this is the most exciting part for the whole team STABILITY in the coaching squad
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
Well I guess I don't NEED to ask, but I'm gonna, is a "massive makeover" more.less or the same as a "rebuild"?
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
Thordaddy said:
Well I guess I don't NEED to ask, but I'm gonna, is a "massive makeover" more, less, or the same as a "rebuild"?
I don't think there's any doubt it's a rebuild. And it shouldn't be surprising or objectionable that it is. Most coaches come in and put their stamp on a team by scrapping a bunch of the existing players in favor of not only signing their own, but also in favor of drafting a completely different *type* of player. It also can't all be accomplished in one year.

I don't think this situation here should be held up to any sort of comparable standard either. Meaning, just because they kept a couple of players at certain positions, that it doesn't qualify as a rebuild because in a similar situation, those positions weren't replaced.

We have what? 6 or 7 guys from the 2011 roster now? Out of 53?
How many new coaches?
A new owner?

It's just my opinion, but I think it's kinda obvious.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
The Dude said:
Thordaddy said:
Well I guess I don't NEED to ask, but I'm gonna, is a "massive makeover" more, less, or the same as a "rebuild"?
I don't think there's any doubt it's a rebuild. And it shouldn't be surprising or objectionable that it is. Most coaches come in and put their stamp on a team by scrapping a bunch of the existing players in favor of not only signing their own, but also in favor of drafting a completely different *type* of player. It also can't all be accomplished in one year.

I don't think this situation here should be held up to any sort of comparable standard either. Meaning, just because they kept a couple of players at certain positions, that it doesn't qualify as a rebuild because in a similar situation, those positions weren't replaced.

We have what? 6 or 7 guys from the 2011 roster now? Out of 53?
How many new coaches?
A new owner?

It's just my opinion, but I think it's kinda obvious.

Yes indeed you speak "ancient logic" your Dudeness
 

nighttrain

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
9,216
rickrawk said:
Pead is gonna surprise alot of people this year. Same with Brian Quick. I trust Snead & Fisher, and if they didn't expect big things from those two, they would've done a lot more in free agency.
Am I the only one who thinks we will be very good on offense in 2013?

GO RAMS!!!!

Both were held back in favor of SJ and Gibbons, not anymore, they are the NOW
train
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
“We’ve always said that players make their biggest improvement from year one to year two.”
-- Jeff Fisher

And since Fisher treated Bradford's "third" season as his first, then we should expect a huge step forward from him too.
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
18,188
Name
Haole
Excellent point about Bradford. I like that line of thinking.
 

Rambitious1

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
4,556
Name
Tom
rickrawk said:
Pead is gonna surprise alot of people this year. Same with Brian Quick. I trust Snead & Fisher, and if they didn't expect big things from those two, they would've done a lot more in free agency.
Am I the only one who thinks we will be very good on offense in 2013?

GO RAMS!!!!

I Hope so.

And I think he will too.
 

ramsince62

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
2,592
The Dude said:
“We’ve always said that players make their biggest improvement from year one to year two.”
-- Jeff Fisher

And since Fisher treated Bradford's "third" season as his first, then we should expect a huge step forward from him too.
Agreed....as was pointed out previously, it was obvious that Sam "turned the corner" in the 2nd half of the season, especially in the last 6 games (4-2).

I expect that the biggest difference this year will be marked by winning the close ones that slipped by last season. I've been holding back at making predictions or becoming too optimistic (early) assuming that the build would probably take 3 years. That said, I fully anticipate 10 or more wins this season. Ironic that just when the Rams become legitimate, they're matched up against the toughest division. :roll:
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #16
ramsince62 said:
Ironic that just when the Rams become legitimate, they're matched up against the toughest division. :roll:
I know. It's part of that cloud that's followed this team around for a while now.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
The Dude said:
ramsince62 said:
Ironic that just when the Rams become legitimate, they're matched up against the toughest division. :roll:
I know. It's part of that cloud that's followed this team around for a while now.
Random Chance? :cry: :ww:
 

ramsince62

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
2,592
The Dude said:
ramsince62 said:
Ironic that just when the Rams become legitimate, they're matched up against the toughest division. :roll:
I know. It's part of that cloud that's followed this team around for a while now.

Yup, it kind of reminds me of the "Ruth" (trade) curse that dogged the Red Sox for almost a century. Both my parents were New Englanders and both lived to be 84 and never witnessed the Sox win a World Series. I was so jaded by that time that when they finally won, I'd completely ignored the 7 game series against the Yanks where they came back from 0-3.....there's a lesson in there some place. :huh:
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #19
ramsince62 said:
The Dude said:
ramsince62 said:
Ironic that just when the Rams become legitimate, they're matched up against the toughest division. :roll:
I know. It's part of that cloud that's followed this team around for a while now.

Yup, it kind of reminds me of the "Ruth" (trade) curse that dogged the Red Sox for almost a century. Both my parents were New Englanders and both lived to be 84 and never witnessed the Sox win a World Series. I was so jaded by that time that when they finally won, I'd completely ignored the 7 game series against the Yanks where they came back from 0-3.....there's a lesson in there some place. :huh:
So what do you think facilitated the curse here? Releasing Warner?
Bruce playing in a 49ers uniform?
 

Rabid Ram

Legend
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
7,360
Name
Dustin
The Dude said:
ramsince62 said:
The Dude said:
ramsince62 said:
Ironic that just when the Rams become legitimate, they're matched up against the toughest division. :roll:
I know. It's part of that cloud that's followed this team around for a while now.

Yup, it kind of reminds me of the "Ruth" (trade) curse that dogged the Red Sox for almost a century. Both my parents were New Englanders and both lived to be 84 and never witnessed the Sox win a World Series. I was so jaded by that time that when they finally won, I'd completely ignored the 7 game series against the Yanks where they came back from 0-3.....there's a lesson in there some place. :huh:
So what do you think facilitated the curse here? Releasing Warner?
Bruce playing in a 49ers uniform?

atleast its not a goat haha that would be ironic actually