Quarterback solutions hard to find for Rams/Wagoner

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Quarterback solutions hard to find for Rams
By Nick Wagoner

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/15570/quarterback-solutions-hard-to-find-for-rams

EARTH CITY, Mo. -- In assessing the St. Louis Rams, it's been written or said that they are "only" a quarterback away from taking the next step out of the depths of mediocrity and becoming a legitimate playoff contender.

If only it were that easy. Heading into this offseason, the Rams join a group that includes about half the league riddled with uncertainty at the game's most important position. It's a quarterback-starved league and there simply doesn't appear to be much on the menu for the Rams or any of the other needy teams to come up with a solution.

Which is why the Rams' newest answer appears to be the same as the old one: Bring quarterback Sam Bradford back (at a reduced price, they're hoping) and add another quarterback who can push him for the starting job. But the reality is that finding someone who will legitimately be able to push Bradford isn't going to be easy, especially in the draft.

In a more realistic and, perhaps, ideal world, the Rams will be able to have a healthy Bradford for the short term while slowly bringing along a young quarterback who could develop as the long-term solution. If Bradford could play well and stay healthy, all the better, but the Rams can't count on that any more than they can count on a young quarterback emerging as a legitimate threat to the starting job.

"The best thing for those guys is if you could ever get in the old days and those guys sit a year," general manager Les Snead said. "When you throw them out there too early and it goes awry you've got to overcome the pressure and the mistakes.

"(You've got to) give them a little bit of a break, don't crucify them. Go back to Troy Aikman, the guy goes 0-16, 1-15 or whatever it was. Nowadays it would be, you need to draft another qb. Let's be honest, playing quarterback in the NFL is a very hard job. The margin for error is so small. The first time here is 'I've got to throw it there?' In this league you're not going undefeated, so how do those guys handle not having success consistently?"

The Rams' pursuit of a quarterback comes with plenty of complications. There simply aren't any appealing starting options that will be available on the free-agent market, though it's possible there could be someone worth taking a flier on. Drafting at No. 10, the Rams likely won't have access to one of the top two prospects in Oregon's Marcus Mariota or Florida State's Jameis Winston, though stranger things have happened.

In Winston's case, there's the slight chance that some off-the-field concerns would make him less appealing to the Rams even if he did fall, though Snead and Jeff Fisher haven't shied away from taking players with some red flags. Even at a position like quarterback, Snead says the evaluation of off-the-field issues doesn't change.

"There's not a cookie-cutter formula, it's a case-by-case basis," Snead said. "You've got to know the human being. As this kid develops and matures, is he going to be able to not repeat the same issues? It's always case by case. Wherever you get drafted, you have some semblance of physical talent, and usually it's the intangibles if you play and produce above your draft status. Intangibles are huge."

For as important as intangibles are, so too are patience and scheme. As the Rams consider offensive coordinator options, their plans at quarterback should be taken into account. From there, it's likely that any young signal-caller brought on board will need time to adjust.

"No. 1, especially with guys in that spread offense, is that's just a different game," Snead said. "If they're trying to hurry up to get the defense tired, everything's based on speed. As an example, nobody's moving protections to where the pressure's coming because there's always a quick outlet. There's usually one read. You come here and it's a little more complicated. Not that they can't do it, they just need some reps doing it, so it's a little harder to throw that guy into the fire in the NFL. It's just a different game."
 

Rmfnlt

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
5,342
Once it became pretty clear that neither Davis nor Hill were going to surprise me as any longe range option at QB and I started looking around at free agents, I figured it was probably going to come down to Bradford again... and that's scary.

The only thing I hope for is there some other possibility that neither I, nor the local media guys have counted on.

Something that comes out of the blue and knocks our socks off.

Because, of what we know and can see today, QB is a real toughie for the Rams.
 

RamsJunkie

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
2,093
I wish they would go hard after Garappallo. I would be all for a trade down in the first to pick up an extra 2nd and then trade that first rounder to NE for him. but I can wish in one hand and crap in the other to see which one gets filled first and I guarantee there will be doodoo everywhere before that happends.
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,593
With such a QB-driven league, the discontinuation of the third QB exemption seems ridiculous.
 

Warner4Prez

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
2,266
Name
Benny
I wonder if they take a crack at Mallet for the #2. I don't recall how serious his injury was supposed to be, torn pectoral was it? He's got the athleticism and could be had cheap, and I think of the guys that might offer starter upside (like Locker, Ponder, Gabbert, McCoy et all) he scares me the least.
The book is still largely out on the guy, I'd kick the tires.
 

RamsJunkie

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
2,093
I wonder if they take a crack at Mallet for the #2. I don't recall how serious his injury was supposed to be, torn pectoral was it? He's got the athleticism and could be had cheap, and I think of the guys that might offer starter upside (like Locker, Ponder, Gabbert, McCoy et all) he scares me the least.
The book is still largely out on the guy, I'd kick the tires.

As a Razorback fan I would love to see Mallet get a chance here. as far as athleticism goes hes a statue but hes got one of the biggest arms in the league and hes a big dude. If we can fix the oline with a strong running game I think mallet could excel in this offense. We have definately got some serious deep threats here and Mallet has the arm to hit them in stride. But sadly I really dont think Houston is gonna let him get away but I would love to be wrong.
 

Warner4Prez

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
2,266
Name
Benny
As a Razorback fan I would love to see Mallet get a chance here. as far as athleticism goes hes a statue but hes got one of the biggest arms in the league and hes a big dude. If we can fix the oline with a strong running game I think mallet could excel in this offense. We have definately got some serious deep threats here and Mallet has the arm to hit them in stride. But sadly I really dont think Houston is gonna let him get away but I would love to be wrong.
Yeah, Houston is a bit unpredictable. They need a QB, but they could decide to (finally) stick with Keenum as a #2 option and look for help in the draft. I guess it would make sense for them to make an effort to hang onto Mallet, but I think he's unrestricted, so if the Rams were to make a compelling offer, maybe he'd hear them out.
Otherwise, I do think Bradford is the only option. If they bring in a guy like Matt Moore and tell everyone it's a competition, that's a bit of a laugher, IMO.