(Poll) Do you want Wes Welker back with the Rams?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Do you want Wes Welker back with the Rams?

  • Yes

    Votes: 71 81.6%
  • No

    Votes: 16 18.4%

  • Total voters
    87

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2016/4/19/11459012/are-the-rams-bringing-back-wes-welker

Are the Rams Bringing Back Wes Welker?
posted by RamBuck

Welker_locker.0.0.jpg



The Rams recently relocated to Oxnard, California for their offseason program. What's interesting is the Rams appear to be keeping a locker for WR Wes Welker, who became a free agent in March. The image is from the 5:04 mark of this video from the Rams' website.
 

woofwoofmo

65 Toss Power Trap
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
598
At this stage of the proceedings, sure. Bring him back with an incentive laden, cap friendly, non-guaranteed contract. Players with a winning resume are sorely lacking in the locker room. Could also be a big aid in developing the new qb. Really nothing to lose by seeing what's left in the tank before the season starts.
 

woofwoofmo

65 Toss Power Trap
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
598
No, I want Anquan Boldin!

I'd take him too! Rams need all the help at WR they can muster. Let them battle it out in TC and take the best 5 or 6. The odds of finding an impact WR in this draft are significantly reduced, got to look under every rock at this point.
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,589
Wes moves the chains, or would have if Case or Nick Foles ever found him. Besides, Tavon was getting earfuls of advice from him about working his craft. Sted and a few others could stand to benefit too. (Yes, I believe Sted will make it back and be an important contributor this season) Sted may not get great separation, but he gets enough that an accurate QB will find him, and Sted fights for the rock like he's a much bigger guy. An accurate QB benefits everyone. Quickie, Kendricks could stand to improve their catches if the balls were humming in more consistently & accurately. I want to see Todd open up so much more as a receiver (and as a sometimes passer, too).
 

12intheBox

Legend
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
10,146
Name
Wil Fay
Nah. I'll take something in a younger - maybe more athletic and less concussed model.

Gotta give him credit for continuing to answer the bell - but I think it's time to move on.
 

Psycho_X

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,113
If he wants to compete in camp with limited guaranteed money sure. We don't have much better at the moment. But hopefully we don't need him because someone younger and better some how makes it to our roster.
 

JackDRams

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,524
Name
Jack
He was open a lot only to be over thrown or just plain missed during reads. Yeah I'd bring him back for cheap. If he doesn't make it past cuts, oh well.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
12,089
Name
Charlie
No, I want Anquan Boldin!

I'd definitely take Boldin over Welker. But if that can't happen, I'd be open to Welker starting with the team from camp and helping a young kid with this ability to find open spots and good hands. On 3rd and 6 he's a pretty good option. But 3rd and ten ain't his thing anymore. Then again, maybe the kid can hit him in stride and he can get yards after catch. Foles and Keenum weren't able to do that.
 

woofwoofmo

65 Toss Power Trap
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
598
Just curious. To those voting "No", who, other than Boldin, would you want to see as a Ram WR? Not much to chose from in the FA's left, and the odds of drafting a WR in the 4th or 6th rds, who contributes much more than special teams, are pretty slim.
 

Leuzer

Daniel Leu
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
2,166
Who is going to catch ball for us? We have Tavon, Stedman, Britt, Quick, Toon, and Marquez. Of those 6 I'd rather have Welker over Quick, Toon, and Marquez. We'll see how things play out after the draft, but if we don't pick up a reliable veteran or a young receiver then we should keep Welker.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
He's gonna be 35 in a couple of weeks; but if he can still ball then I don't care.
Let him compete in camp with everyone else.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #14
From 11/10/15
*************************************
http://deadspin.com/wes-welker-is-back-and-it-feels-terrible-1741666314

Wes Welker Is Back And It Feels Terrible
Barry Petchesky

1512878269933156527.jpg



By all accounts—his own, his teams’, and a top NFL-affiliated concussion specialist’s—Wes Welker is healthy and ready to play. St. Louis badly needs a receiver. Still, when the Rams announced they signed Welker to bolster their etiolated passing attack, my first reaction was disappointment. It’s a strange feeling, to hope that Wes Welker—a talented WR and by all accounts a decent guy—never plays football again.

It’s the concussions. At least six official ones in his career, maybe as many as 10. (That doesn’t count the ones he may not even know about.) He suffered three in nine months with the Broncos, leading one former teammate to publicly declare he wanted Welker to retire. The thing about concussions is that the more you’ve had, the more likely you are to receive more.

Welker’s brain is especially fragile and vulnerable. If teams avoided signing the still-useful receiver this offseason solely because of his concussion history—and some very specifically did—it wasn’t necessarily just the potential bad PR in a sport that claims to take brain trauma very seriously. It was legitimate concern for Welker’s well-being.

But the Rams are desperate. Already struggling with the NFL’s single worst passing offense, St. Louis lost No. 3 WR Stedman Bailey to a four-game substance-abuse suspension. They worked out three receivers yesterday: Welker, Hakeem Nicks, and Vincent Brown. They signed Welker.

“He’s in outstanding shape, we saw that early this morning,” head coach Jeff Fisher said. “He’s anxious and eager to play. He’s moved the chains for two potential Hall of Fame quarterbacks.”

While Nick Foles is not a third HOF QB, Welker will help, especially with the Rams’ NFL-worst third-down conversion rate. He’s exactly the guy to target on short crossing routes for medium yardage—even though that’s exactly what has resulted in so many brain injuries for the undersized Welker.

He’s not effective if he can’t go over the middle, but going over the middle is what keeps putting him in the neurologist’s office. The Rams know the risk; Welker’s deal is heavy on incentives. If he can’t stay healthy, they won’t have to pay him.

The risk to Welker is greater. The best science can tell us—and it’s not much, not yet—is that each concussion will make him more likely to suffer diminished quality and length of his life after football. Does he know this? Intellectually, sure. But it’s maybe too much to ask of a 34-year-old to think about his life decades from now, especially when it’s about his livelihood now, and nothing is guaranteed.

Maybe one more concussion won’t worsen things in 30 years. Maybe Welker will get lucky and suffer no ill effects after he retires. Maybe it’s already too late. There’s no way to know: the only question for Welker, here and now, is if he wants to keep playing football.

Who the hell am I to ask someone else to give up the only job they’ve ever known, when they’re still good at it and within a few years will be off the table forever? Why so much concern for Welker, who may be the most visible face of concussions, but none for the other couple thousand NFL players who are allowed to take varying degrees of the same risk every week without having their choices questioned?

Is this sort of handwringing solely selfish on my part, meant to signify to myself and others that I’m an educated, conscientious consumer of a sport that does terrible things to bodies and brains, even as I consume it nonetheless and reward the NFL for its disposable-player model? Is caring about Wes Welker just about making myself feel better?

I don’t think it’s necessarily hypocritical to both watch football and care about concussions; there isn’t any aspect of life that doesn’t require some compartmentalization. But seeing Welker suit up makes me uncomfortable, because he’s a bright, blinking symbol of all the ignoring I’m doing the rest of the time.

The truth is this: I don’t want Wes Welker to play because it makes me uncomfortable. That’s no good reason for him to hang it up. (I’d say Welker certainly has his own good reasons to hang it up, but that’s a personal value judgment for him to weigh.)

So I’m left with wishes, none of which can come true. I wish Welker would retire. I wish the Rams wouldn’t have signed him. I wish this sport didn’t hurt the people who play it, or make me feel so bad sometimes about loving it.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,678
I would bring Welker back. With a more accurate QB who can actually hit a smaller WR guys like him and Tavon will be much more involved.

Boldin would be great too. But he's not in a hurry to sign and I don't think signing Welker would keep them from signing Anquan. So yes to both in my opinion.
 

A55VA6

Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
8,208
I think you explore other options in FA/draft and if you don't get a guy, re-sign him. I still that he can run good routes and he has good hands. Could also continue to help teach our WR's.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,785
Maybe, depends what happens before camp. If Wes has concussion issues maybe he should just retire.
 

TheDYVKX

#TeamMcVay
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
4,703
Name
Sean McVay
Why not? Welker looked good with us from what I saw. Our QB situation wasn't good enough to take advantage of him, neither Foles nor Keenum is effective in the short passing game.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
Yes. We don't really have a good option at slot right now with Bailey probably not playing again and Marquez unproven. Britt, Quick and Austin do not play slot receiver so we need the help.

With the trade, almost certainly, that help is not coming from the draft.