- Joined
- Feb 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,922
- Name
- Peter
No, that's why there are only excerpts from this article in this post. To read the whole thing click the link below.
Does PK continue his weird fixation with Tom Brady and the Patriots? You bet.
************************************************************************************
http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/05/22/future-super-bowl-sites-nfl-rule-changes-owners-meeting
On Super Bowl Sites, Rule Changes and Jinxed Jags
Owners meet this week to discuss where SB 53-55 will be held and other topics, including replay review. Plus more on Jacksonville’s latest rookie injury, the Washington nickname and the NFL’s incredible shrinking stat
By Peter King
So the news of the NFL week starts in Charlotte, where owners begin gathering tonight for the annual quickie spring meeting (24 hours for these impatient billionaires), and by sundown Tuesday we’ll have three new Super Bowl cities. Let’s start there, handicapping Super Bowls 53, 54 and 55, with a special emphasis on the middle one, because it will end pro football’s 100th season, and you know how the NFL likes to put on a show when there’s some sort of anniversary.
* * *
The next two Super Bowls are in Houston (SB 51, in February 2017), and Minnesota (SB 52, in February 2018). My picks for the next three—and please do not take this as anything more than my best guess after some conversations with people who know more than I do, and that’s a lot:
• Super Bowl 53, February 2019: Atlanta over New Orleans. The Saints would love to give 88-year-old Tom Benson one extremely important gift this late in life, another Super Bowl to finish the 99th season of professional football. And it could happen. But I think there’s more impetus to give the game to Atlanta. The new Falcons stadium, which opens in the summer of 2017, will have had two regular seasons to work out the kinks.
Atlanta has the college football national championship game in 2018, and the Final Four in 2020. Every franchise in the south (and some in the north) that builds new stadiums gets a Super Bowl early in the life of the new building, and Atlanta has not hosted the game since 2000.
Super Bowl 54, February 2020: South Florida over Los Angeles and Tampa Bay. The truth is the NFL would love to give the Super Bowl capping the league’s first century to the city where the first Super Bowl was played, Los Angeles. It could happen. But the Rams would really prefer to not be preparing for a Super Bowl in the first season the new stadium in Inglewood is operational. The NFL usually gives teams with new stadiums at least one season to work out the kinks before handing it the golden game.
The organization doesn’t know if the huge stadium and campus will be fully up and running by the end of that season, and the last thing the league and team would want is for such a historic Super Bowl to have UNDER CONSTRUCTION signs on the site of the game. So the pick here is a reward for Stephen Ross and south Florida, for all the refurbishing the Dolphins have done on the stadium there. This would put south Florida in the all-time Super Bowl lead—if it gets an 11th world championship game 51 years after hosting the biggest upset in Super Bowl history, the Joe Namath-led Jets win over the Colts.
Super Bowl 55: February 2021: Los Angeles over Tampa Bay. With the Rams pushing for a Super Bowl after their second regular season in L.A., that makes this season more likely. Although Tampa Bay will be doing work on its stadium that makes the NFL happy, it’s probably not enough to win the day in either of the last two games to be awarded.
* * *
Photo: Joe Robbins/Getty Images
The NFL is considering allowing video to be used on sideline tablets during games. Currently, only still images can be utilized.
Rules the owners will consider in Charlotte
No real biggies, and you can never predict confidently which measure can get a three-quarters vote from the owners, but a quick rundown of the key issues on Tuesday:
• Video study on sidelines during games. Currently, teams can look at still images on their Microsoft Surfaces on sidelines during games, or on images faxed from the press box the old-fashioned way. Last year, during a few preseason games and the Pro Bowls, coaches and quarterbacks could watch video on the Surfaces, and the players and coaches loved it.
“The teams that used it want this to to pass—badly,” one longtime GM said Saturday. “The Microsoft technology was just too good.” But because all teams didn’t have the chance to use the video, some teams could vote against it and say they want to study it one more preseason. It is likely, though, that whether it’s 2016 or some season in the near future, teams will graduate from pictures to video on the sideline. It makes too much sense to use the technology.
• Washington’s proposal for one roster cutdown. The NFL cuts rosters from 90 to 75 after the third preseason game, and then from 75 to 53 after the fourth preseason game. Washington is proposing one cutdown, from 90 to 53, after the fourth game. Seems harmless. Don’t sense any momentum for it, though. Doubt it passes.
• A convoluted proposal to define what’s NOT replay-reviewable more clearly, twinned with giving the New York replay center more power in officials’ calls. The second part of this is more important. If this passes, NFL vice president of officiating Dean Blandino and his lieutenant, Alberto Riveron, would be empowered—as they were in the 2015 playoffs—to correct administrative errors with direct communications to the referees at game sites. This would cover corrections in marking of the football, enforcement and correct yardage of penalties, and game- and play-clock operations.
“It’s a fail-safe for the officials,” said one source. “It became clear during the playoffs last year that it was good to have this as an insurance policy for the on-field officials. There’s no reason not to have it.” But Blandino and Riveron would still not be able to dictate reversals or upheld calls under review. The first part of the rule simply makes it clearer what can and can’t be reviewed, so it’s not a matter of such confusion to coaches.
Three other notes: A source said the Ravens withdrew a proposal that would make replay-reviewable potential defenseless-player hits by defenders on offensive players. No word given for it, but likely this happened the way many withdrawals do—because Baltimore thought it had scant chance of passage … One hour has been set aside at the meetings so the league can discuss the next wave of research and funding for player health and safety … There is nothing on the league agenda about the Raiders’ dalliance with Las Vegas.
But this is the elephant in the meetings, and it’s likely that there will be at least lobby and backroom talk about it, even if the normally reticent Raider owner Mark Davis doesn’t stand up and bring it to the floor during the general session. There is a general feeling in the league that 10 years ago a franchise in Vegas would have been laughed at. But you know this league. If owners think it’s a cash cow, all of sudden the trepidation over playing a couple of miles from where legal bets can be made on NFL games is suddenly going to go away. What a surprise.
* * *
On the Brady case
You’ll very likely see the Tom Brady case take the next step today, the deadline for the next hearing following the 2-1 ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ last month that overturned last fall’s ruling that freed Brady from his four-game suspension. The Second Circuit has to determine if it will take the case, first of all, and it’s not likely the court will; SI.com legal analyst Michael McCann says this court takes on cases such as this less than 1 percent of the time.
If that court won’t hear the case, it’s likely that the Brady/NFL Players Association legal team will appeal to the United States Supreme Court. That seems an even longer shot. There aren’t many in the legal community who give Brady a good chance to either overturn the suspension or continue to push the legal ball down the field so he’d be able to play while the case continues to be adjudicated. But as we discovered just before the start of the season last year, with Judge Richard Berman’s ruling allowing Brady to play, sometimes you get upsets when courts are involved. So stay tuned.
I asked The MMQB’s business/legal analyst, Andrew Brandt, about the case. His thoughts: “There is no downside for the appeal—other than more legal fees (paid by the union, not Brady)—and it strategically delays the legal process as we approach the latter part of the offseason and training camp. Procedurally, there is an automatic stay (hold) on Brady’s suspension until the court determines whether to accept or deny a rehearing.
If they deny, the stay is lifted and the suspension is back on. If they accept, the stay continues while there is more briefing and eventually a hearing schedule (in other words, several more months). There is no way to know how long it will take for the court to accept or deny the rehearing.
The NFLPA and Brady's outlook is not good—the vast majority of these appeals to the full court are denied—but they cling fast to the hope provided by the fact that Judge Katzmann, the dissenting judge from the 2-1 decision in favor of the NFL, is the chief judge of the circuit. In any event, today's appeal will buy Brady some amount of time. The court will ask the NFL to file a reply brief, a process that will take weeks in itself.”
* * *
Photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images
Owner Mark Davis is exploring the option of moving the Raiders to Las Vegas.
Quotes of the Week
I
“I came into the league in ’94. Back then, any exploration of that market was dismissed out of hand. I’m looking where we are today and thinking of the last 10 to 15 years, and the emergence of new media, with Google and Facebook and the like. We’re just living in a different world, technology-wise. The [sports gambling] risks in Vegas are no longer exclusive to Vegas. Whatever the risks, they are no greater [in Las Vegas] than playing a game in New Jersey.”
— New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, joining Dallas’ Jerry Jones as high-profile owners supporting the Raiders’ move to Las Vegas, in remarks to USA Today.
II
“Robert has to be willing to change. Besides his family and his faith, football should be the most important thing in his life, and I don’t think it was always that way when he was in Washington. He was worried about too many other things, and I’m not saying anything I haven’t tried to tell him. He has to give all that stuff up. Total dedication and commitment—that’s what it will take. It’s all up to Robert.”
— Hall of Fame quarterback Warren Moon, on quarterback Robert Griffin III, trying to rebuild his career in Cleveland after getting released by Washington, in an enlightening story by former Washington Post beat man Jason Reid—now a senior NFL writer for The Undefeated.
* * *
Photo: Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
DeAngelo Williams has the third-most rushing touchdowns of any active running back.
Stats of the Week
I
The NFL’s Incredible Shrinking Stat: touchdown numbers for running backs.
Adrian Peterson has 97, and there’s little doubt he’ll become the 10th back in history to rush for at least 100 touchdowns; in fact, this year, he could catch Jim Brown, number five on the list with 105.
But after that, there’s a long fall to the number two active touchdown runner: The Colts’ Frank Gore, 33 years old, enters the season with 70 career rushing touchdowns. Number three on the active list is DeAngelo Williams, with 57.
The decline in emphasis on the running game is making the touchdown run passé. Find an offensive category in NFL history with only two of the top 50 players of all-time being active today. That’s the case with rushing touchdowns. Peterson is 10th, Gore 30th, Williams 52nd.
II
Comparing the new Atlanta Falcons’ concessions prices to others around the NFL for specific staple food and drink items (according to team prices for the 2015 season in Team Marketing Report) when the new Atlanta stadium opens in 2017:
Hot dogs: Atlanta $2, Oakland $6.75.
Domestic beer (12 ounces): Atlanta $5, Philadelphia $8.50.
Soft drink: Atlanta $2 (12 ounces); San Francisco (16 ounces) $6.
“These are not grand-opening specials,” said owner Arthur Blank. “This is a core philosophy.”
For those who have to pay the one-time personal seat licenses (priced between $500 and $45,000), it’s an olive branch too.
The stadium is set to be completed on June 1, 2017.
* * *
Nine Things I Think I Think
1. I think you’ll read more about the NFL Players Association’s Rookie Premier event from the weekend in Los Angeles this week from Emily Kaplan, but I wanted to point out one interesting thing from the deal: Of the 41 invitees, 40 are offensive skill position players. The lone outlier was Chargers top-pick defensive end Joey Bosa. Reports Kaplan: “If February’s combine in Indianapolis is a job fair for prospective players, consider the Rookie Premier in Los Angeles a business combine—the newly minted professionals are exposed to marketing and sponsorship opportunities, and can flaunt their individual brands to attract long-term partnerships.
Why the love for only quarterbacks, running backs and wide receivers? Surely the seven first-round offensive linemen could benefit from this, as could a player like Jaguars linebacker Myles Jack, who is considered supremely marketable. The roster is crafted by the NFLPA’s business partners, such as Panini, a trading card company, and EA Sports, which calculate what sells. [These partners pay for the rookie’s trips to the exhibition, and each participant leaves with a minimum of $12,000 for signing cards, recording video content, etc.] There were initially 40 invitees.
However one player was a late add: the Vikings’ Moritz Boehringer. He was a hit at the three-day event, though much of the NFL world and its surrounding hoopla is still foreign for the German-born wideout. In one sponsor obligation, players were asked to do dramatic readings of Justin Bieber lyrics. “I just don’t know what to say,” Boehringer said to the videographer. “Just repeat, ‘Baby, baby, baby,’” the videographer instructed. Boehringer obliged, reciting the lyrics with his thick accent and intermittent giggles. As he exited for his next obligation, he remarked: “This might be the weirdest thing I’ve ever done.” Later this week, Kaplan will have a further report on the event, with some good intel on Paxton Lynch.
2. I think the four strangest things about the Bovada.com win-total over-unders for the 2016 season are:
a. The Super Bowl-champ Broncos have a number of 9, which seems low, and is certainly an indictment of their quarterback situation. Your move, Mark Sanchez.
b. The Tom Brady-suspension factor lives: The Patriots have won 12, 13 or 14 games for each of the last six seasons. Bovada has New England with 10.5 wins.
c. Only five teams with a double-digit projection: Pats, Pack, Panthers, Steelers, Seahawks, all at 10.5.
d. Bovada likes Jameis and the Bucs, and the re-made Jags: 7.5 wins each … which is more than the over/under for the Eagles, Saints, Dolphins and Lions (7 apiece).
3. I think one interesting thing looking back on the draft is the Atlanta pick of Florida safety/linebacker Keanu Neal. Widely viewed as a reach at 17 by Atlanta (he was projected to be a second-rounder by most of the draft gurus), what the Falcons have seen this month are things well beyond his years. Neal is 20; he won’t turn 21 until the week the Falcons open training camp in July. Coach Dan Quinn will rely on him early on to be a defensive leader (which he was last year, clearly, at Florida), both verbally and on the practice field.
He won’t be a physical force in the way of Kam Chancellor, whom he’s been compared to—he’ll be more of a sideline-to-sideline presence down in the box and deep in center field. The Falcons also think he’ll be able to man-cover the good tight ends in the division: Carolina’s Greg Olsen, Coby Fleener (the free-agent who landed with the Saints) and Tampa’s Austin Seferian-Jenkins. We’ll see about whether Neal is worthy to have been picked that high. The Falcons need a smart, fluid, versatile, communicative safety, and there will be pressure on Neal to be that guy right away.
4. I think this was a very interesting lead this week, from The MMQB’s Robert Klemko about the Raiders’ flirtation with Las Vegas; it contains something I never thought of:
When the upstart United Football League planted its premier franchise in Las Vegas in 2009, team owners organized a series of meetings between casino marketing directors and moguls such as Steve Wynn, and a UFL contingent including commissioner Michael Huyghue and Jim Fassel. The latter, a former NFL coach of the year, would lead the Las Vegas Locomotives at 60 years old, three years removed from his last NFL gig.
Fassel led the effort to court casino partnerships. His request for each casino: Buy 100 tickets for each home game and parse them out to your guests. “It was a unanimous no,” Fassel says now, four years after the UFL shuttered its doors. “They said, No, no, no, we’re not doing that. We want to keep people in the casinos.”
5. I think I did note that Brock Osweiler told our Jenny Vrentas he holds “no grudge” with the Denver Broncos, and while I’m not accusing him of not telling the truth, I retain the same feeling I’ve had since he left the Super Bowl champs for a lesser team: Something happened in Denver that Osweiler didn’t like and that led him to leave—the late-season benching perhaps. But something.
6. I think one of the biggest offseason problems with the NFL is that we cover it too much. Waaaaaaay too much. With really stupid stuff, sometimes. The Newark Star Ledger had a headline Friday on the web saying, “Giants’ Odell Beckham Jr. named 1 of most hated players in NFL history.” It detailed a Sporting News story on the 40 most hated players in NFL history. How Odell Beckham could have become one of the most hated players in NFL history in two seasons (and, really, for one idiotic performance against Josh Norman) is pure madness.
So I went and looked at the list, which is hilarious for its recency alone. No one on the list of most hated players in the history of pro football played in the first 50 years of pro football, from 1920 to 1970. (Jack Tatum was the most veteran of the group, and he debuted for the Raiders in 1971.) But hey, why bother to do the work to find out the villains of the Lambeau Era?
Nineteen-year-olds haven’t heard of them, so why bother with them? The point is, people are going to click on a list like this, even if it’s insipid and stupid. After all, I clicked on it, which is certainly what this site wanted. Hooray for the stupiding-down of our business.
7. I think I feel for Tom Benson in his family feud. I know enough about it to know he’s more in the right than his extended family is.
8. I think I still can’t believe the NFL accepted $723,734 from the Defense Department to honor military service members at league games and other league-sponsored functions. It’s the classic case of the greed personified that drives some league decisions, and the kind of decision that should force people at the highest business levels of the league to ask: Why on earth would we even consider taking money from the military to monetize patriotism in our stadiums? The only good thing—and I can’t praise the league for it, because it’s highly unlikely the league would have chosen to give the money back without being outed—is the NFL is giving the money back.
9. I think this will show my age. But no matter how quiet the Giants are about what Janoris Jenkins said to Paul Schwartz of the New York Post last week, about having five children with four women, none of whom is his wife, they cannot be happy with it. Said Jenkins: “When they were going with me, they understand, ‘OK, he’s a football player. He’s gonna have multiple women.’ That just comes with dating a football player.”
So, monogamy is either highly unusual or just wrong for a football player? The establishment Giants owners, the Maras and Tisches, have to be gagging at the thought that for their football-playing employees, it’s expected that traditional families are passe.
