bluecoconuts said:Did Richardson get hurt or what? I didn't see what he did at all, saw Pead averaged over 4 yards per carry though.
Sum1BTRthnU said:Pead looked good in that small dose.
I think Richardson is nothing more than a complementary player. I don't know if you could ever depend on Richardson to be the main back. Pead on the other hand still has the potential to be. Next season a lot of these second year players are going to turn some heads.
PhxRam said:Sum1BTRthnU said:Pead looked good in that small dose.
I think Richardson is nothing more than a complementary player. I don't know if you could ever depend on Richardson to be the main back. Pead on the other hand still has the potential to be. Next season a lot of these second year players are going to turn some heads.
Care to explain where you had this opportunity to see his potential?
Sum1BTRthnU said:PhxRam said:Sum1BTRthnU said:Pead looked good in that small dose.
I think Richardson is nothing more than a complementary player. I don't know if you could ever depend on Richardson to be the main back. Pead on the other hand still has the potential to be. Next season a lot of these second year players are going to turn some heads.
Care to explain where you had this opportunity to see his potential?
He was a second round draft pick. He was sat early on because of ball control issues. I think there is plenty of potential left to be shown.
I posted on stltoday the other day Peads rookie numbers compared to Darren Sproles...Peads are better.
Although his snap count was very little, in my opinion Pead looks much more like a back that can play a more featured role than Richardson...and I really like Richardson, I just don't see him being able to carry the rock for an entire game if needed.
PhxRam said:Sum1BTRthnU said:PhxRam said:Sum1BTRthnU said:Pead looked good in that small dose.
I think Richardson is nothing more than a complementary player. I don't know if you could ever depend on Richardson to be the main back. Pead on the other hand still has the potential to be. Next season a lot of these second year players are going to turn some heads.
Care to explain where you had this opportunity to see his potential?
He was a second round draft pick. He was sat early on because of ball control issues. I think there is plenty of potential left to be shown.
I posted on stltoday the other day Peads rookie numbers compared to Darren Sproles...Peads are better.
Although his snap count was very little, in my opinion Pead looks much more like a back that can play a more featured role than Richardson...and I really like Richardson, I just don't see him being able to carry the rock for an entire game if needed.
I understand he is a second round pick and that is precisely why I expected more out of him. I am still willing to give the guy time but I am not so ready to write off Richardson. Richardson beat out pead in camp and for good reason.
Btw.. What is stltoday???
Sum1BTRthnU said:PhxRam said:Sum1BTRthnU said:PhxRam said:Sum1BTRthnU said:Pead looked good in that small dose.
I think Richardson is nothing more than a complementary player. I don't know if you could ever depend on Richardson to be the main back. Pead on the other hand still has the potential to be. Next season a lot of these second year players are going to turn some heads.
Care to explain where you had this opportunity to see his potential?
He was a second round draft pick. He was sat early on because of ball control issues. I think there is plenty of potential left to be shown.
I posted on stltoday the other day Peads rookie numbers compared to Darren Sproles...Peads are better.
Although his snap count was very little, in my opinion Pead looks much more like a back that can play a more featured role than Richardson...and I really like Richardson, I just don't see him being able to carry the rock for an entire game if needed.
I understand he is a second round pick and that is precisely why I expected more out of him. I am still willing to give the guy time but I am not so ready to write off Richardson. Richardson beat out pead in camp and for good reason.
Btw.. What is stltoday???
Yes, ball control.
Not writing him off at all. I just really feel Pead has a bright future. Being a second round pick doesn't always mean you are an instant difference maker.
X said:I think Pead's just a slow developer. Which is fine. Some guys get to the dance and become a bit overwhelmed by how large it is, or they take a little longer to absorb an entire NFL offense. Granted we haven't seen a bunch from him this year, but that doesn't say much to me. He just needs to get to that next level where he realizes what he's capable of doing, and nothing else around him matters. He just doesn't seem to have a ton of confidence right now, but it should come. Quick is the same way, and I'm not worried about him either.
You're spot on. Especially about that confidence comment. In Fisher's presser today he stated that he made sure Pead got touches so he can go into the offseason with confidence.X said:I think Pead's just a slow developer. Which is fine. Some guys get to the dance and become a bit overwhelmed by how large it is, or they take a little longer to absorb an entire NFL offense. Granted we haven't seen a bunch from him this year, but that doesn't say much to me. He just needs to get to that next level where he realizes what he's capable of doing, and nothing else around him matters. He just doesn't seem to have a ton of confidence right now, but it should come. Quick is the same way, and I'm not worried about him either.
Speeps said:You're spot on. Especially about that confidence comment. In Fisher's presser today he stated that he made sure Pead got touches so he can go into the offseason with confidence.