RamFan503 said:Nah - freak that. Didn't listen to it but it comes up every year. Pre-season is evaluation time. Gotta have it. I wonder how many coaches would agree with this idea.
If you get rid of preseason, it's still a level playing field. Evaluation can come in camp and OTA's, and every team will have to roll the dice on their depth players during the season. I'm not a fan of preseason either, and the league won't lose much at all if it goes away.CGI_Ram said:RamFan503 said:Nah - freak that. Didn't listen to it but it comes up every year. Pre-season is evaluation time. Gotta have it. I wonder how many coaches would agree with this idea.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of preseason. 4 games seems too much.
But, what is the right amount and how do you evaluate fringe players without putting them into games?
X said:If you get rid of preseason, it's still a level playing field. Evaluation can come in camp and OTA's, and every team will have to roll the dice on their depth players during the season. I'm not a fan of preseason either, and the league won't lose much at all if it goes away.CGI_Ram said:RamFan503 said:Nah - freak that. Didn't listen to it but it comes up every year. Pre-season is evaluation time. Gotta have it. I wonder how many coaches would agree with this idea.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of preseason. 4 games seems too much.
But, what is the right amount and how do you evaluate fringe players without putting them into games?
X said:If you get rid of preseason, it's still a level playing field. Evaluation can come in camp and OTA's, and every team will have to roll the dice on their depth players during the season. I'm not a fan of preseason either, and the league won't lose much at all if it goes away.CGI_Ram said:RamFan503 said:Nah - freak that. Didn't listen to it but it comes up every year. Pre-season is evaluation time. Gotta have it. I wonder how many coaches would agree with this idea.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of preseason. 4 games seems too much.
But, what is the right amount and how do you evaluate fringe players without putting them into games?
Make it up by offering pay-per-view games to everyone in the world. $6.99 per game.CGI_Ram said:X said:If you get rid of preseason, it's still a level playing field. Evaluation can come in camp and OTA's, and every team will have to roll the dice on their depth players during the season. I'm not a fan of preseason either, and the league won't lose much at all if it goes away.CGI_Ram said:RamFan503 said:Nah - freak that. Didn't listen to it but it comes up every year. Pre-season is evaluation time. Gotta have it. I wonder how many coaches would agree with this idea.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of preseason. 4 games seems too much.
But, what is the right amount and how do you evaluate fringe players without putting them into games?
I think the league does lose... Unless they add regular season games back in.
They collect regular season prices on those preseason tickets, parking, and concessions.
X said:Make it up by offering pay-per-view games to everyone in the world. $6.99 per game.CGI_Ram said:X said:If you get rid of preseason, it's still a level playing field. Evaluation can come in camp and OTA's, and every team will have to roll the dice on their depth players during the season. I'm not a fan of preseason either, and the league won't lose much at all if it goes away.CGI_Ram said:RamFan503 said:Nah - freak that. Didn't listen to it but it comes up every year. Pre-season is evaluation time. Gotta have it. I wonder how many coaches would agree with this idea.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of preseason. 4 games seems too much.
But, what is the right amount and how do you evaluate fringe players without putting them into games?
I think the league does lose... Unless they add regular season games back in.
They collect regular season prices on those preseason tickets, parking, and concessions.
Something they should have been doing for a while now.
RamBall said:If the owners dont want to lose the revenue, maybe add 2 or 4 games to the reg season. With no divisional games in the first 4 weeks, add a few bodies to the roster, maybe make it 60 instead of 53. By not playing divisional opponents the first 4 weeks it gives everyone a chance to settle their roster before the most important regular season games. The owners dont lose revenue and the season ticket holders dont get screwed by having to pay for preseason tickets.
Player safety is the only downside I see, 20 reg season games plus playoffs would be brutal on a players body, makes depth much more important. Coaches would then be more likely to sit starters when games get out of hand to preserve them for next week and beyond.
I think this idea has been brought up before, probly every preseason, but it may be a feasible option.
RamBall with an expensive option:
If the owners dont want to lose the revenue, maybe add 2 or 4 games to the reg season. With no divisional games in the first 4 weeks, add a few bodies to the roster, maybe make it 60 instead of 53. By not playing divisional opponents the first 4 weeks it gives everyone a chance to settle their roster before the most important regular season games. The owners dont lose revenue and the season ticket holders dont get screwed by having to pay for preseason tickets.
Player safety is the only downside I see, 20 reg season games plus playoffs would be brutal on a players body, makes depth much more important. Coaches would then be more likely to sit starters when games get out of hand to preserve them for next week and beyond.
When I connected them they made the shape of a turnip. Right?faylan dipping his toe in octopus infested waters:
Im from oklahoma so I hope you guys can connect the dots.