There is no one in this story that is not an insufferable shit bag.
I agree with all this.Argh, you are the Grinch!
My only Christmas wish was that these types of worthless-shit-stirring-political-ramble-rousing-threads would just disappear from ROD forever,
but here it is.
DAMN YOU!!!! SANTA DOESN’T EXIST
Especially the part about these disappearing from ROD. Is that still an option here?I agree with all this.
Yep.Especially the part about these disappearing from ROD. Is that still an option here?
You, sir, are a good person. We might say different in the PMs, but out here in the open you're the best.
I didn't do it but thanks just the same. Paulie was just a little quicker... THIS TIME.You, sir, are a good person. We might say different in the PMs, but out here in the open you're the best.
Seriously though, saving us the headache and arguments.
Back at yuh my man.Ok, well thank you too @-X- as well. You're both good people.
You didn’t see it as political (or suspected it would turn that way), but felt the need to put in a warning disclaimer anyway?I didn't see it as political but I understand why some in their 50s or older might. I posted it for its ironic nature. Same issue and argument but genders reversed over the last 50 years.
Yes I thought it could be misconstrued as political even though it wasn't. Thats why the warning was in the title. It was about gender, simply male and female role reversal on this same issue from 1969 to 2019. I remember the bra burning and the sit ins at all male clubs, female reporters in male locker rooms etc. Yet undeniably the times have changed where today we've already had a major party female presidential candidate, speaker of the house, women in combat, women now are the majority of college graduates and in the majority in various professions including veterinarians, pharmacists and natural sciences managers. So today the 30ish year old women interviewed in the article had no idea of the irony in their position. Perhaps the guys will burn their boxers in protest?You didn’t see it as political (or suspected it would turn that way), but felt the need to put in a warning disclaimer anyway?
It was an article about an all women club in NYC that had to let men in and some 30ish year old women were using the same complaints now that men used 50 years ago. I found the irony funny. So did my wife.Well then. Since y'all deleted the original post, I'll just add my own personal facts:
Girls rule, boys drool.
It was an article about an all women club in NYC that had to let men in and some 30ish year old women were using the same complaints now that men used 50 years ago. I found the irony funny. So did my wife.
The laws are already on the books and have been for decades. I don't see a political angle at all. It is a club. Thread killed is fine by me.I did read it, but it was definitely a political slant. Best not to get into it.