I can be a numbers nerd at times, but I love stats. Some interesting ones (to me) about the Rams so far this season:
We are dead last in offensive plays run by teams who have played all four games. 50 plays per game (and only 21 of those are runs).
We are 30th in time of possess at 26:19 per game. Leaves our D on the field a lot.
We are dead last in 1st downs per game (about 4 fewer than #31).
The emergence of Gurley will likely improve all three of these stats.
Well...let's look at the "NUANCES" of such a conclusion:
1. The Rams probably have the youngest OLine in the league...but those guys are learning and getting better, their worst game has been against the Skins where Foles was under constant pressure...BUT...that *MAY* be the game that taught them a lot.
2. A young OLine is going to *most likely* affect the passing game because that's where they see the most sophisticated pass rush strategies. The QB has to be on top of his game and make good reads with his WRs.
3. Even in the run game you're going to have problems with a young OLine. Yesterday, in the second half the coaching staff decided to use Harkey and Cook to beef up the run blocking in the 2nd half. That was the HUGE difference that helped G2 to "cut loose".
Here's my point...the Rams MADE THE RIGHT ADJUSTMENT and the Cards had NO ANSWER.
That's what happened yesterday my friend...so while I understand "loving stats"...you have to look at the reason why the stats got better.
Next week it's Green Bay...and once again..it will be a game of adjustments. When you look at stats...you also have to go to the REASON the stats got better!
As has been said...it's a game of adjustments. As I watched the game one thing I didn't like about the Rams defensive adjustments is they ran a lot of 3-4 fronts. They did that to get more pass coverage...but I think Williams needed to just go with an old fashioned "dime defense with JL in the middle. I say that because you have Barron and McLeod, who can hit like linebackers while you still have four pass rushers to get after Palmer.
I could be wrong...but I think Williams bought into the 3-4 front a bit too much for my taste.