- Joined
- Nov 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,928
- Name
- Phil
What really needs to happen is simplify rules. They are way to vague. On the Goff "fumble" or "forward pass" I hear that one thing is whether he had control What does that mean. Just like the Reynolds non-PI call was was he significantly impeded. Seems the word significant is up to interpretation.Give the refs full time status next CBA deal
Yeah, but after blowing the call, it gets sent to NY Riverton who blows it, then commented on by Blandino in booth, who blows it.Or possibly optometrist 20/20 visual tests.
Its not about the physics which is motion... What we saw, what they saw etc. Who is the blind one in all this?...Yeah, but after blowing the call, it gets sent to NY Riverton who blows it, then commented on by Blandino in booth, who blows it.
Not one Physics 101 class, nor common sense, amongst ANY of these yahoos???
Maybe common sense should be a prerequisite for the job.
Not sure I follow.Its not about the physics which is motion... What we saw, what they saw etc. Who is the blind one in all this?...
Not sure I follow.
Ball thrown 10 yards downfield can only happen by MOTION of QB’s arm (when pressure comes the front).
Simple physics.
But they're saying he lost control of the ball before his arm moving forward pushed the ball downfield.