NFL considering overtime rule change

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,232
Name
Burger man
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/n...ime-rule-change-that-could-lead-to-more-ties/

For the second time in five years, the NFL’s overtime rule could be undergoing a drastic change, and if it happens, we could see more ties.

According to NFL.com, the competition committee is set to propose a rule at the league’s annual Spring meeting that would reduce the length of overtime. If the rule were to pass, the overtime period would be shortened from 15 minutes to 10 minutes for all regular season and preseason games.

For a proposal to become an NFL rule, it has to get a “yes” vote from 24 of the league’s 32 owners, who will all be attendance for the meeting, which is set for March 26-29 in Phoenix.

If the overtime rule proposal were to pass, it would have no bearing on the playoffs. The postseason would still operate with an overtime period that runs for 15 minutes.

The NFL is considering the change for regular-season games because the league wants teams to be on an even playing field for Thursday night games. According to NFL.com, the league feels that teams are at a “real disadvantage” when they have to play a Thursday game following a Sunday game where they played a 15-minute overtime period.

Of course, the obvious downside to having a shorter overtime is that it would likely mean that we’d see more ties during the regular season. There were a total of two ties during the 2016 season, which marked the first time since 1997 that there were multiple ties in a season.

According to NFL Research, 22 of of the 83 overtime games that have been played since 2012 have gone on for more than 10 minutes, which means those games would’ve presumably ended in a tie if the new rule had already been implemented. So, yes, if you love ties, this could be a good change for you.

If the rule does pass, it would be the second big change in five years. Back in March 2012, the NFL modified overtime with a rule change that guaranteed both teams a possession as long as the team that received the overtime kickoff didn’t score a touchdown on its opening drive.

Before that rule was instituted, NFL overtimes were sudden death, which means that the first team that scored won the game whether those points came by field goal, safety or touchdown.

The rule change in 2012 was actually implemented for playoff games in 2010, but the NFL didn’t make it the rule for all games until two years later.

With both teams getting a possession in most games that went to overtime, the 2012 rule change dramatically increased the number of ties in the NFL. From 2012 to 2016, there were five ties in the regular season, which is a huge number when you consider that there were only five ties from 1989-2011 before the rule change.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
Hmmm, ... not sure I like this. According to their own stats almost 1/4 of overtime games could end in a tie. Why would that be a good thing ? How about they just get rid of 5 minutes worth of advertising to make the games more bearable to watch.
 

RhodyRams

Insert something clever here
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Moderator
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
12,263
I dont see why they dont use the college OT rules..with each team getting the ball from the 35
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,380
I actually like the idea of infusing more ties into the standings. It makes for easier tie breaking procedures. And so sometimes when there's a game "nobody deserved to lose" they won't. More importantly the same could be said for those games nobody deserves to win. :D
 

wolfdogg

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,965
Name
wolfdogg
After the first ot they should have a 2nd ot but eliminate punts and time outs.
 

Mikey Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
3,403
Name
Mike
I don't like improving the chance of ties...They change the dynamic of records too much for my liking...The only thing I always disliked about OT was the sudden death...Tough to have a game being so likely to hinge on a coin toss..Each team getting at least one possession worked for me...None of the college BS though...
..
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,465
Name
Bo Bowen
I dont see why they dont use the college OT rules..with each team getting the ball from the 35
I agree or at least make sure both teams get a chance to possess the ball at least once.
 

Ramlock

Here we f’n go, baby!
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
5,055
Name
Ramlock
The
College Rules

All over it

After first 2 scores, you have to go for two

Yes
 

IowaRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Messages
6,621
Name
Iowa
Is this the same NFL that's been considering placing a team in Europe ?

Because I can see were having to play 5 extra minutes in overtime , is way tougher , then having to pack everything up and fly half way around the world , just for one game
 

dolphinlover123

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
1,448
I don't like improving the chance of ties...They change the dynamic of records too much for my liking...The only thing I always disliked about OT was the sudden death...Tough to have a game being so likely to hinge on a coin toss..Each team getting at least one possession worked for me...None of the college BS though...
..

I also think each team should get a chance to play. And then have a 2 pt conversion shoot-out. :D now thatd be fun to watch.
 

Zodi

Hall of Fame
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
3,638
College rules are by far the most logical. But keep it to one "quarter", so there are still ties.

No kickoffs works because players are already fatigued. And matching scoring gets rid of any "well they got the ball first" excuse.
 

Ramrasta

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
3,208
Name
Tyler
I was never a fan of college rules overtime. It seems like a completely different game and it reduces the advantage of having a legendary punter like we have.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,057
I was never a fan of college rules overtime. It seems like a completely different game and it reduces the advantage of having a legendary punter like we have.
Exactly, why eliminate special teams from an overtime game? I hate it in college and would hate it more in the pros
Back on topic,
Personally, I don't mind the shorter time, but I think both teams should get a possession, regardless of whether a team scores a TD or not. But I do like the idea of a shorter quarter as it seems that games are either over right away, or wait until the final seconds. And the more there are ties, brings that in to the equation of playoffs. Why is that a bad thing?
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
18,198
Name
Haole
The fact that they claim this is only being done because of the Thursday Night games is reason enough to immediately throw this idea in the fucking garbage. What a crock of shit.

This idea is stupid anyway.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,232
Name
Burger man
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #20
The fact that they claim this is only being done because of the Thursday Night games is reason enough to immediately throw this idea in the freaking garbage. What a crock of crap.

This idea is stupid anyway.

I thought the "Thursday night game" justification was weak too.