NFC West Q&A: Will the Rams' defensive line dominate?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
NFC West Q&A: Will the Rams' defensive line dominate?
By Nick Wagoner

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-ra...west-qa-will-the-rams-defensive-line-dominate

Today's question: All of you cover teams going through changes on the offensive line. How does the rest of the NFC West match up against a St. Louis Rams' defensive line that features five first-round picks?

Josh Weinfuss, Arizona Cardinals: Here's the thing about the Rams' defensive line: I love it. I think it's locked and loaded, which is why I have the Rams beating the Cardinals twice at this point. The left side of the Cardinals' offensive line will be impenetrable. The other three-fifths, however, could be the difference between winning and losing. Right tackle Bobby Massie struggled with the speed rush last season, getting off his position if he was pushed back too far. And with Jonathan Cooper transitioning to right guard, a good lineman may take advantage of his inexperience. And size could be an issue for Arizona at center. The Cardinals will have to rely on chipping from their tight ends and stout pass protection from their running backs and fullbacks to force the defensive line away from the quarterback.

Paul Gutierrez, San Francisco 49ers: This, frankly, is where the 49ers should take a deep breath and swallow hard. Their offensive line was in constant flux last season -- their projected O-line of LT Joe Staley, LG Mike Iupati, C Daniel Kilgore, RG Alex Boone and RT Anthony Davis played together a grand total of one-plus quarter last season. And now, Iupati is gone, Kilgore is returning from a broken ankle and Boone and Davis chose to stay away from voluntary OTAs. Oh, and the 52 sacks the Niners allowed last season were the most they've given up since 2008. The Rams sacked 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick eight times last year in a 13-10 St. Louis victory in Santa Clara. Consider: 39 of the Rams' 40 sacks last season came in their final 11 games. So, yeah, there's some reason for concern in Santa Clara. A lot of concern. Here's hoping that the year-old Twitter beef between Chris Long and Anthony Davis gets settled on the field this season, rather than in cyberspace, what with the two never facing off in 2014.

Terry Blount, Seattle Seahawks: The problems of that matchup are one of the big reasons the Seahawks have struggled at times against the Rams recently. In the past two seasons, Russell Wilson has been sacked 17 times in four games against St. Louis. Now the Seahawks enter this season, including the season opener at St. Louis, with two new starters on the offensive line. The probable backups are rookies. And they aren't likely to get much help from the tight end spot. Jimmy Graham is a giant upgrade in the passing game, but he's not going to help much with the Rams' edge rushers. The St. Louis defensive front is the one area that has given the Seahawks fits and the biggest reason they have a chance at an upset in the first game of the year, if the new guys up front for the Seahawks aren't ready to go.
 

PowayRamFan

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
2,359
Either this is an old piece, or the SF guy doesn't know shit about his own team. Davis retired...
 

TheDYVKX

#TeamMcVay
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
4,703
Name
Sean McVay
Here's hoping that the year-old Twitter beef between Chris Long and Anthony Davis gets settled on the field this season, rather than in cyberspace, what with the two never facing off in 2014.

I thought he was retiring. Is this guy stupid?
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
This is the 1st piece, put out by Wagoner that I've read in over a Month, loved it! Even though Wagoner spoke very little in it. THEN AGAIN MAYBE THAT'S WHY IT WAS GOOD!!
 

brokeu91

The super shrink
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
5,546
Name
Michael
I have your answer right here:

HELL-YEAH.jpg
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,765
Dan Graziano is correct when he says we need more than just a dominating D-line. Where he makes a mistake IMO, is in his assessment of our O. It's hard to believe that even starting 2 rookies and a ? at C, our O-line won't be at least as good as the 2014 version and we've made at least modest improvements every where else on the O except at RB. Even with the loss of Stacy our RB corps has the potential to become very good if Gurley pans out and plays enough to be a difference maker and if not, not much worse than what we had last year.

All in all, We're a better team than what we put on the field last year and all three of the other teams (including the Shehags) haven't improved as much or in some cases, gotten worse. I think they should all fear us.
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,079
I am really looking forward to seeing how the DT rotation is managed.
No team has a rotation of the quality of Fairly, Brockers and Donald.
 

Rams43

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
4,130
Dan Graziano is correct when he says we need more than just a dominating D-line. Where he makes a mistake IMO, is in his assessment of our O. It's hard to believe that even starting 2 rookies and a ? at C, our O-line won't be at least as good as the 2014 version and we've made at least modest improvements every where else on the O except at RB. Even with the loss of Stacy our RB corps has the potential to become very good if Gurley pans out and plays enough to be a difference maker and if not, not much worse than what we had last year.

All in all, We're a better team than what we put on the field last year and all three of the other teams (including the Shehags) haven't improved as much or in some cases, gotten worse. I think they should all fear us.

Very well said, Alan.

As usual, the pundits are behind the curve.

Our replacement OL rookies on opening day should be at least as good as were Wells and Joseph last year. That's just not a big stretch at all. And, unlike Wells and Joseph, our youngsters will likely be growing by leaps and bounds with each game under their belts.

Another thing is that I believe the pundits are still behind the curve on our status at QB, WR, and at OC. I expect a balanced and efficient O this year, with or without Gurley. One that will catch these pundits by surprise early on.