Most egregious non-call in SB History???

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

SWAdude

And don't call me Shirley
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 23, 2018
Messages
2,348
Name
John
I having a hard time letting this one go. I will but it is a process.

How does the ref miss this? It was a complete game changer that made too big of a difference.

I realize many called can be questionable. This was more potentially a turnover than not. Or a 1st and 22 1/2 at the 12 1/2.

Those Bungle fans are holding onto a few questionable penalties against them. We have a few likewise against us.

But this one haunts me of what it created.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAaTqKwub64
 

FaulkSF

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
5,518
Name
FaulkSF
Pereira submitted a proposal to move the umpire from between the linebackers to opposite the referee that lines up on one side of the QB. I don't know the exact reasoning behind this, but it was likely done out of official safety, offensive line holding, and the NFL employs eight on field officials and two review officials (on site + NY).

Had the umpire position not been moved, they should have free lanced their sight from the line (GCG) and tracked where the ball was being passed. This would have given them a great view of the grab and pull.

You'll notice the field judge official (?) in the replay would only have seen the backs of both Higgins and Ramsey, and may have seen what appeared to be a contested ball that Higgins won. They can't review the penalty on site or NY in this situation. This review was only a pilot for one year thanks to Asshole Face.

TL;DR: Field judge had a great view of Ramsey's and Higgins' backs. NFL needs to reconsider getting an umpire back on the defensive side of the field. See Higgins/Ramsey and Dallas (spots the ball) game.
 
Last edited:

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,689
Not even gonna let myself go there. I was actually walking from my living room full of family to the basement when that all went down. I heard everyone like "noooo, damn that was a terrible way to start the second half".

I literally told myself in that moment, no worries. Rams win this game... And so they did.... And that is all I care to think about. Join me brother. Our season was stressful enough, haha. Bask....
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
6,748
Name
Jeff
Yeah. Absolutely let it go. It doesn't mean s..t! Super Bowls just don't call penalties, except last couple minutes or so. Look at how screwed we were in the first Pats Super Bowl loss. No one ever mentions the Warner hands to the face or Brady's intentional grounding on the last scoring drive.

LET IT GO!
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,092
There is no way Higgins thought he would get away with the face mask (it was too blatant and too center of attention) but my guess is he did it to keep Ramsey from intercepting the ball. Well it worked and then some. It’s a dangerous precedent to set as other WRs may try the same. I could accept acknowledgement from the NFL they missed a blatant and critical call but to pretend no one saw it is disrespectful to the game and to fans.
 

Picked4td

Pro Bowler
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
1,568
i guess im in the minority but i could watch that 100 times and ill still never see the facemask in full speed. i really dont blame the refs at all tbh. really tough to see without slow mo replay
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
39,287
Egregious is the most egregiously used word there is by sports fans.

Also fuck em
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,197
i guess im in the minority but i could watch that 100 times and ill still never see the facemask in full speed. i really dont blame the refs at all tbh. really tough to see without slow mo replay
From behind the play, the way we originally viewed it at full speed, it looked like Ramsey stumbled and fell, I agree. From the side its clear imo.

Here is what I don't understand. All touchdowns get reviewed, even after the ref signals Touchdown. How is that entire play not reviewed?

Or all it would take is for New York to say, " Flag!". The ref throws it and if its wrong pick it up. With technology and all of those camera angles that are being watched some official had to have seen that something questionable happened. Its better to get the call right imo and they have the ability to do it.
 

Force16X

anti pedestrian
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
3,290
From behind the play, the way we originally viewed it at full speed, it looked like Ramsey stumbled and fell, I agree. From the side its clear imo.

Here is what I don't understand. All touchdowns get reviewed, even after the ref signals Touchdown. How is that entire play not reviewed?

Or all it would take is for New York to say, " Flag!". The ref throws it and if its wrong pick it up. With technology and all of those camera angles that are being watched some official had to have seen that something questionable happened. Its better to get the call right imo and they have the ability to do it.
or at least review the player that had the ball and scored.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,163
.

what i don't get is everyone saw ramsey flying through the air for 5 yards. my initial reaction was that he was pushed off. why wouldn't the refs throw the flag then have a discussion and ask new york if they saw anything? if there was nothing there they would pick up the flag. once they did nothing it was over and couldn't be overturned. it's just the illogical way to do it.

.
 

David Ray

Rookie
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Messages
346
Name
Randall
Yeah. Absolutely let it go. It doesn't mean s..t! Super Bowls just don't call penalties, except last couple minutes or so. Look at how screwed we were in the first Pats Super Bowl loss. No one ever mentions the Warner hands to the face or Brady's intentional grounding on the last scoring drive.

LET IT GO!
You mean Pats fans and the MSM sports media never mention it. I have beaten that drum to death on numerous forums over the years, as have others. I should have copyrighted the phrase "The FIX that was XXXVI". The Super Bowl as PSYOP, is what it was.
 

Ellard80

Legend
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
6,349
they eventually are going to use the "eye in the sky" cam that can review calls - in the future this call will likely get made.

It did happen so fast and at a weird angle that i get how the official didnt see it.
 

RamsOfCastamere

I drink things, and know nothing
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
7,872
The ball Burrow threw was not good either. Ramsey was in position to make an interception. He under threw the ball across the field.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,601
Name
Dennis
I having a hard time letting this one go. I will but it is a process.

How does the ref miss this? It was a complete game changer that made too big of a difference.

I realize many called can be questionable. This was more potentially a turnover than not. Or a 1st and 22 1/2 at the 12 1/2.

Those Bungle fans are holding onto a few questionable penalties against them. We have a few likewise against us.

But this one haunts me of what it created.
Here is what one Bengal fan actually said to me, it's different the Refs didn't call it, so you can only complain about calls not non calls because they don't exist.
 

bwdenverram

Legend
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
5,522
Name
BW
I having a hard time letting this one go. I will but it is a process.

How does the ref miss this? It was a complete game changer that made too big of a difference.

I realize many called can be questionable. This was more potentially a turnover than not. Or a 1st and 22 1/2 at the 12 1/2.

Those Bungle fans are holding onto a few questionable penalties against them. We have a few likewise against us.

But this one haunts me of what it created.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAaTqKwub64

As much as I agree with you, imagine being a Saints fan. Sometimes the calls go with you, sometimes against you.
For us, this wasn't a game changer in terms of we lost the chance to go to a SB..
On the other hand, had the call gone against us (as it probably should have) we aren't playing the pats in the SB in 19'
 

JYB

Starter
Joined
Feb 6, 2013
Messages
596
I having a hard time letting this one go. I will but it is a process.

How does the ref miss this? It was a complete game changer that made too big of a difference.

I realize many called can be questionable. This was more potentially a turnover than not. Or a 1st and 22 1/2 at the 12 1/2.

Those Bungle fans are holding onto a few questionable penalties against them. We have a few likewise against us.

But this one haunts me of what it created.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAaTqKwub64

What makes it PARTICULARLY bad is that Ramsey had PERFECT position on the play. At the very least, he would have knocked the ball down, but the truth is, he was in perfect position for a pick.