- Joined
- Oct 5, 2015
- Messages
- 1,315
Anybody who thought they were the same talent wise were nuts. Watching them play on Saturdays you could tell Gurley was on a different level than everybody else he played. From his first game as a freshman he was better than everybody. If it weren't for the knee injury he would/should have went much higher. The AP comparisons were definitely warranted. I think Gurley will be better than Steven Jackson was for us and has HOF ability.To think some 'experts' suggested he was a better pick than Gurley...
I think some thought that Gordon was a healthier, safer choice than Gurley...Still, the Gordon I have seen in the Pro's makes me think he should never have been taken in the 1st round..jmo.Anybody who thought they were the same talent wise were nuts. Watching them play on Saturdays you could tell Gurley was on a different level than everybody else he played. From his first game as a freshman he was better than everybody. If it weren't for the knee injury he would/should have went much higher. The AP comparisons were definitely warranted. I think Gurley will be better than Steven Jackson was for us and has HOF ability.
I think some thought that Gordon was a healthier, safer choice than Gurley...Still, the Gordon I have seen in the Pro's makes me think he should never have been taken in the 1st round..jmo.
There are reasons why teams have been moving away from taking RBs in the first round. Basically, unless they appear to have epic skills to non-fanboys, it's better to fill other positions. Otherwise, there is a high bust rate, and a short career for most of the others. You need RBs, but most teams are better off waiting until later to grab one.
Gurley looked like a future star, but had the injury - a serious concern. Things have worked out as well so far as the Rams could realistically have hoped - but the reason they gambled on taking him in the first is that if he worked out, they knew he would be a major star. Gordon looked like somebody who if he worked out he might get yards in the right situation, maybe a few more yards than most RBs could.
I agree. AP and Gurley are the exception I think. If you cannot get that level of RB, then I don't think it's worth going first round for a RB.
I remember some of our own members saying the same thing after the draft.To think some 'experts' suggested he was a better pick than Gurley...
I remember some of our own members saying the same thing after the draft.
Lol I remember this too. Don't you wish you had a job where you could be completely wrong and sweep it under the rug but praise yourself when a pick goes right? Lol these analysts are ridiculous.To think some 'experts' suggested he was a better pick than Gurley...
Shows how analysts just go with the flavor of the month. Gurley was a generational talent in college but Gordon surpassed him in the minds of someYeah, Gordon was billed as Ib. versus Gurley as 1a....Not even close...I looked over his games, and the most he has run for is around 81 yards, so no 100 yard games yet. His output isn't better than Tre Mason's would be in the same system, imo......The Chargers have another RB that is doing just as well, and I have never heard of him....
We got the real deal.
Ditto. I am not a fan of 1st round RB's.
Gurley among the rare exceptions.
Didn't like Gordon too much....Saw some of the holes he was running through in college, and figured my grandma could avg. 6 yards a carry and she's dead.