- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 5,348
Can't say I really disagree. A division leading 1 loss team makes us sound better than we are. But with case keenum as our qb and Kenny Britt as our number one wide out we are not in the upper echelons of the NFL. Especially if Gurley doesn't get going. Our defense is up there but....I don't expect sustained success with this offense
Between these two choices, there is ONLY one possible choice for me "#2!!"Theres 2 ways to look at the Rams season thus far.
1. Theres no way they can continue to win with such a lackluster offense
2. They are winning games with very little offensive production, imagine what happens if they get the offense going.
Clearly this article chooses to believe in option 1, and quite frankly its hard to disagree with anyone that believes option 1 is the case. But no one can see the future so we have no idea how the season will turn out, and to publicize an article as if you know what will happen instead of making it an opinionated article about what you think will happen is just foolish.
Wait, what? The 1985 Bears were 2nd in the league in scoring in 85 with 28.5 points per game!There's been plenty of NFL teams that made the playoffs with not much of an offense. '85 Bears (who's that on the sidelines coaching up the LB's?).
Hoo-ray, another bleacher report article.
Think I'll write one myself while on my throne break tomorrow afternoon. May even have time for two.
I would like a convincing victory, or even have our offense put a game away. In our 3 wins we relied on our D to save the game for us. I don't think we can win 10+ games like this.
Welp. My first reaction was to just discredit the whole story due to the source. Bleacher Report isn't setting any records for Pulitzers in Sports Journalism, after all. So I read it instead. All of it. Now I can go ahead and discredit it due to the source again after having done my due diligence. That piece of crap 'story' was all over the place. Seriously ALL over the place.
Hope that's not that dude's day job.